IPFS
Larkin Rose on the government going after Sherry Jackson
Written by Thomas Costanzo Subject: CorruptionBy Larkin Rose and Sherry Jackson
Determined to crush dissent and
squelch open discussion at all costs, the federal government is once again
seeking to punish a "tax heretic"--someone with the gall to suggest
that the federal Income tax is not what it seems. This time they are going
after Sherry Peel Jackson, having charged her with several counts of misdemeanor
"willful failure to file" (the same thing they falsely accused me
of).
I never thought I'd see a more bogus
"affidavit of probable cause" than the one the IRS used in my case,
but now I have. The "APC" in Sherry's case is nothing but a list of
how Sherry has SPOKEN HER MIND, in different places and through different
mediums (talks, videos, etc.). How dare she?! Burn her!
The reason the feds really hate
Sherry, and want her silenced and destroyed at all costs (this has nothing to
do with "law enforcement," and everything to do with crushing
dissent) is not just that she is very vocal about her beliefs, but that she
used to be one of them. To have a former IRS Revenue Agent publicly saying that
the IRS is defrauding people is something the control freaks in DC will not
tolerate.
As stupid as American juries can be,
the feds are going to have a tough time with this one. Sherry being black,
female, and a former IRS agent really messes up the "tax protestor"
stereotype the feds love to use. I'm sure they will still do everything they
can to demonize her, but she is very well-spoken, and has been very consistent
and honest throughout. (Maybe they'll dress her up as a witch, like in the
Monty Python skit.)
The feds got a serious black eye
when their attempt to destroy another former fed--Joseph Banister --failed, with
"not guilty" verdicts on all counts. Personally, I think in some ways
Sherry is an even tougher target than Joe. But the fact that Sherry has to go through
this at all, just for having the decency to speak out against what she sees as
a huge injustice, is an abomination, and shows the true nature of the American
tyrants, and the thugs who work for them (under the ridiculous label of
"Justice Department").
So the question is, shall we abandon
Sherry to the wolves, and quietly watch from a safe distance to see how she
does? Um, no thanks. I would of course encourage you to send Sherry whatever financial
support you can, if nothing else to deprive the federal fascists of the
additional pleasure of financially penalizing her for speaking out (which would
harm her even if she is acquitted). But I would also encourage you to support
her with your EYES, by keeping a close eye on what the feds are trying to do to
her, and how.
Sincerely,
Larken Rose
www.larkenrose.com
(P.S. If you want to support Sherry
via PayPal, you can send funds
to
"spjcpa@bellsouth.net".)
Jun 7, 2007, 11:13 PM
Hi,
On Friday, April 13th (the last
possible day that it could be done
To include the year 2000) the
government filed criminal charges
against me. The charge is from
Section 7203 and it is willful failure to file. There are four counts 2000,
2001, 2002 and 2003.
This was not in Indictment, it was
an Information. I have been told that an Indictment is for felonies and an
Information is for misdemeanors. Because they filed the charges they finally
had to unseal the affidavit of probable cause that the agent swore to the
judge to get permission to invade my home. This affidavit is just a listing of
all of the places that I have spoken out and asked the government to show the
law. It does not state any criminal acts on my part, but it does state
that they had my family under surveillance, they went through our garbage and
they retrieved our mail. They also went
to my church and demanded the records of all my tithes and offerings for those
four years. Who is the criminal?
Anyway, the affidavit claims
conspiracy, and three other violations. However, after all was said and done
they came up with willful failure to file. Those of you that know the law know
that we have an excellent chance to win this case. Without getting into any
details of our strategy, I have retained Larry Becraft (that handled Vernie
Kuglin’s case) and a local attorney to help me. We will work to obtain the same
outcome as Vernie
I will need help paying legal fees.
I have already taken out a Signature loan, but I have no equity in my home and
can’t refinance for any funds. If you would like to help us obtain a
victory it would be kind of you to donate towards a victory. I am working to
get all of my Breaking The Invisible Shackles DVD’s back, (they stole
about 800 of them) and those that send at least $100 will receive an
autographed one if and when I get them back.
If you plan to help out please write
the check or money order to Sherry Jackson and send it to 1560 Fieldgreen
Overlook, Stone Mountain, Georgia 30088. I do not have a legal defense
fund set up but hopefully you trust that these funds will go straight to
pay the attorneys (which they want to be paid up front). Our goal is
40,000 which will include the remainder of the attorney fees and the known
expenses like travel and hotel.
I pray that you are with me at least
in prayer that we prevail and that our country gets back to the country that it
was meant to be. I think a victory is needed and will help
Sincerely,
"Cowardice asks the question:
is it safe? Expediency asks the question: is it political? Vanity asks the
question: is it popular? But conscience asks the question: is it right? And
there comes a time when one must take a position that is neither safe, nor
political, nor popular - but one must take it simply because it is right."
Martin Luther King, Jr.
"I had reasoned this out in my
mind, there was one of two things I had a right to, liberty or death; if I could
not have one, I would have the other." Harriet Tubman