![]() |
|
FEATURE ARTICLE |
|
|
|
Will Iran Kill the Petrodollar?
Marin Katusa Date: 01-25-2012 Subject: Casey Research Articles The official line from the United States and the European Union is
that Tehran must be punished for continuing its efforts to develop a
nuclear weapon. The punishment: sanctions on Iran's oil exports, which
are meant to isolate Iran and depress the value of its currency to such a
point that the country crumbles. But that line doesn't make
sense, and the sanctions will not achieve their goals. Iran is far from
isolated and its friends â€" like India â€" will stand by the oil-producing
nation until the US either backs down or acknowledges the real matter at
hand. That matter is the American dollar and its role as the global
reserve currency. The short version of the story is that a 1970s
deal cemented the US dollar as the only currency to buy and sell crude
oil, and from that monopoly on the all-important oil trade the US dollar
slowly but surely became the reserve currency for global trades in most
commodities and goods. Massive demand for US dollars ensued, pushing
the dollar's value up, up, and away. In addition, countries stored their
excess US dollars savings in US Treasuries, giving the US government a
vast pool of credit from which to draw. We know where that
situation led â€" to a US government suffocating in debt while its
citizens face stubbornly high unemployment (due in part to the high
value of the dollar); a failed real estate market; record personal-debt
burdens; a bloated banking system; and a teetering economy. That is not
the picture of a world superpower worthy of the privileges gained from
having its currency back global trade. Other countries are starting to
see that and are slowly but surely moving away from US dollars in their
transactions, starting with oil. If the US dollar loses its
position as the global reserve currency, the consequences for America
are dire. A major portion of the dollar's valuation stems from its lock
on the oil industry â€" if that monopoly fades, so too will the value of
the dollar. Such a major transition in global fiat currency
relationships will bode well for some currencies and not so well for
others, and the outcomes will be challenging to predict. But there is
one outcome that we foresee with certainty: Gold will rise. Uncertainty
around paper money always bodes well for gold, and these are uncertain
days indeed. To
explain this situation properly, we have to start in 1973. That's when
President Nixon asked King Faisal of Saudi Arabia to accept only US
dollars as payment for oil and to invest any excess profits in US
Treasury bonds, notes, and bills. In exchange, Nixon pledged to protect
Saudi Arabian oil fields from the Soviet Union and other interested
nations, such as Iran and Iraq. It was the start of something great for
the US, even if the outcome was as artificial as the US real-estate
bubble and yet constitutes the foundation for the valuation of the US
dollar. By 1975, all of the members of OPEC agreed to sell their
oil only in US dollars. Every oil-importing nation in the world started
saving its surplus in US dollars so as to be able to buy oil; with such
high demand for dollars the currency strengthened. On top of that, many
oil-exporting nations like Saudi Arabia spent their US dollar surpluses
on Treasury securities, providing a new, deep pool of lenders to support
US government spending. The "petrodollar" system was a brilliant
political and economic move. It forced the world's oil money to flow
through the US Federal Reserve, creating ever-growing international
demand for both US dollars and US debt, while essentially letting the US
pretty much own the world's oil for free, since oil's value is
denominated in a currency that America controls and prints. The
petrodollar system spread beyond oil: the majority of international
trade is done in US dollars. That means that from Russia to China,
Brazil to South Korea, every country aims to maximize the US-dollar
surplus garnered from its export trade to buy oil. The US has
reaped many rewards. As oil usage increased in the 1980s, demand for the
US dollar rose with it, lifting the US economy to new heights. But even
without economic success at home the US dollar would have soared,
because the petrodollar system created consistent international demand
for US dollars, which in turn gained in value. A strong US dollar
allowed Americans to buy imported goods at a massive discount â€" the
petrodollar system essentially creating a subsidy for US consumers at
the expense of the rest of the world. Here, finally, the US hit on a
downside: The availability of cheap imports hit the US manufacturing
industry hard, and the disappearance of manufacturing jobs remains one
of the biggest challenges in resurrecting the US economy today. There
is another downside, a potential threat now lurking in the shadows. The
value of the US dollar is determined in large part by the fact that oil
is sold in US dollars. If that trade shifts to a different currency,
countries around the world won't need all their US money. The resulting
sell-off of US dollars would weaken the currency dramatically. So
here's an interesting thought experiment. Everybody says the US goes to
war to protect its oil supplies, but doesn't it really go to war to
ensure the continuation of the petrodollar system? The Iraq war
provides a good example. Until November 2000, no OPEC country had dared
to violate the US dollar-pricing rule, and while the US dollar remained
the strongest currency in the world there was also little reason to
challenge the system. But in late 2000, France and a few other EU
members convinced Saddam Hussein to defy the petrodollar process and
sell Iraq's oil for food in euros, not dollars. In the time between then
and the March 2003 American invasion of Iraq, several other nations
hinted at their interest in non-US dollar oil trading, including Russia,
Iran, Indonesia, and even Venezuela. In April 2002, Iranian OPEC
representative Javad Yarjani was invited to Spain by the EU to deliver a
detailed analysis of how OPEC might at some point sell its oil to the
EU for euros, not dollars. This movement, founded in Iraq, was
starting to threaten the dominance of the US dollar as the global
reserve currency and petro currency. In March 2003, the US invaded Iraq,
ending the oil-for-food program and its euro payment program. There
are many other historic examples of the US stepping in to halt a
movement away from the petrodollar system, often in covert ways. In
February 2011, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, managing director of the
International Monetary Fund (IMF), called for a new world currency to
challenge the dominance of the US dollar. Three months later a maid at
the Sofitel New York Hotel alleged that Strauss-Kahn sexually assaulted
her. Strauss-Kahn was forced out of his role at the IMF within weeks; he
has since been cleared of any wrongdoing. War and insidious
interventions of this sort may be costly, but the costs of not
protecting the petrodollar system would be far higher. If euros, yen,
renminbi, rubles, or for that matter straight gold, were generally
accepted for oil, the US dollar would quickly become irrelevant,
rendering the currency almost worthless. As the rest of the world
realizes that there are other options besides the US dollar for global
transactions, the US is facing a very significant â€" and very messy â€"
transition in the global oil machine. Iran
may be isolated from the United States and Western Europe, but Tehran
still has some pretty staunch allies. Iran and Venezuela are advancing
$4 billion worth of joint projects, including a bank. India has pledged
to continue buying Iranian oil because Tehran has been a great business
partner for New Delhi, which struggles to make its payments. Greece
opposed the EU sanctions because Iran was one of very few suppliers that
had been letting the bankrupt Greeks buy oil on credit. South Korea and
Japan are pleading for exemptions from the coming embargoes because
they rely on Iranian oil. Economic ties between Russia and Iran are
getting stronger every year. Then there's China. Iran's energy
resources are a matter of national security for China, as Iran already
supplies no less than 15% of China's oil and natural gas. That makes
Iran more important to China than Saudi Arabia is to the United States.
Don't expect China to heed the US and EU sanctions much â€" China will
find a way around the sanctions in order to protect two-way trade
between the nations, which currently stands at $30 billion and is
expected to hit $50 billion in 2015. In fact, China will probably gain
from the US and EU sanctions on Iran, as it will be able to buy oil and
gas from Iran at depressed prices. So Iran will continue to have
friends, and those friends will continue to buy its oil. More
importantly, you can bet they won't be paying for that oil with US
dollars. Rumors are swirling that India and Iran are at the negotiating
table right now, hammering out a deal to trade oil for gold, supported
by a few rupees and some yen. Iran is already dumping the dollar in its
trade with Russia in favor of rials and rubles. India is already using
the yuan with China; China and Russia have been trading in rubles and
yuan for more than a year; Japan and China are moving towards
transactions in yen and yuan. And all those energy trades between
Iran and China? That will be settled in gold, yuan, and rial. With the
Europeans out of the mix, in short order none of Iran's 2.4 million
barrels of oil a day will be traded in petrodollars. With all this
knowledge in hand, it starts to seem pretty reasonable that the real
reason tensions are mounting in the Persian Gulf is because the United
States is desperate to torpedo this movement away from petrodollars. The
shift is being spearheaded by Iran and backed by India, China, and
Russia. That is undoubtedly enough to make Washington anxious enough to
seek out an excuse to topple the regime in Iran. Speaking of that
search for an excuse, this is interesting. A team of International
Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) inspectors just visited Iran. The IAEA is
supervising all things nuclear in Iran, and it was an IAEA report in
November warning that the country was progressing in its ability to make
weapons that sparked this latest round of international condemnation
against the supposedly near-nuclear state. But after their latest visit,
the IAEA's inspectors reported no signs of bomb making. Oh, and if
keeping the world safe from rogue states with nuclear capabilities were
the sole motive, why have North Korea and Pakistan been given a pass? There
is another consideration to keep in mind, one that is very important
when it comes to making some investment decisions based on this
situation: Russia, India, and China â€" three members of the rising
economic powerhouse group known as the BRICs (which also includes
Brazil) â€" are allied with Iran and are major gold producers. If
petrodollars go out of vogue and trading in other currencies gets too
complicated, they will tap their gold storehouses to keep the crude
flowing. Gold always has and always will be the fallback currency and,
as mentioned before, when currency relationships start to change and
valuations become hard to predict, trading in gold is a tried and true
failsafe. 2012 might end up being most famous as the year in which
the world defected from the US dollar as the global currency of choice.
Imagine the rest of the world doing the math and, little by little,
beginning to do business in their own currencies and investing ever less
of their surpluses in US Treasuries. It constitutes nothing less than a
slow but sure decimation of the dollar. That may not be a bad
thing for the United States. The country's gargantuan debts can never be
repaid as long as the dollar maintains anything close to its current
valuation. Given the state of the country, all that's really left
supporting the value in the dollar is its global reserve currency
status. If that goes and the dollar slides, maybe the US will be able to
repay its debts and start fresh. That new start would come without the
privileges and ingrained subsidies to which Americans are so accustomed,
but it's amazing that the petrodollar system has lasted this long. It
was only a matter of time before something would break it down. Finally,
the big question: How can one profit from this evolving situation?
Playing with currencies is always very risky and, with the global game
set to shift to significantly, it would require a lot of analysis and a
fair bit of luck. The much more reliable way to play the game is through
gold. Gold is the only currency backed by a physical commodity; and it
is always where investors hide from a currency storm. The basic
conclusion is that a slow demise of the petrodollar system is bullish
for gold and very bearish for the US dollar. [Smart investors realize oil, like gold, is destined to rise dramatically and that investing in the right energy companies now will be like getting into the yellow metal 10 years ago.] |