Great article Annonymous75! Your presentatiopn is incomparable!

I think this conspiracy theorist who believes his theory is fact, still has his Anti-Government 911 hang-over. I have also my conspiracy theory that I believe is the truth of who conspired to do the 911 carnage and blamed it on President George W. Bush -- Al Gore and his political supporters. Supporting facts: He went to Saudi Arabia and delivered a speech before the Saudi King that in the United States Arabs were mistreated by the Bush Administration. Motive: Revenge. Al Gore could have been President instead of Bush if not for the Florida Chad Votes orchestrated by his brother Gov. J. Bush that cheated him of the presidency. So my conspiracy theory is, Al Gore and his accomplices did 911 -- not Al Qaeda.  PureTrust and I are sure Al Qaeda had nothing to do with 911. Crazy? You bit. So are all those conspiracy theories that beat on your brain like drops of hailstorm that beats on the rooftop of your mountain cabin in a freezing winter in the middle of nowhere.

To ImPureTrust: Your rhetoric is useless. Be honestly pure and go direct to the point: Do you deny that Al Qaeda did 911? Do you really believe that the Government -- not those Islamic terrorists -- hijacked those American jetliners and rammed them against the New Yorks Twin Towers killing more than 6,000 innocent victims? What did you see in your dream that millions of Americans did not see on that fateful day of infamy?

Some of you jokers just don't get it! (Now I don't really believe you can be that dumb, so I wonder what your motives really are. Just like to talk? Confuse any issue? Total anti-freedom?)

If there had never been such a thing as Al Qaeda, those 9/11 perpetrators in the U.S. Government would have found some other patsy/scapegoat. There are lots of anti-American groups out there who could be blamed. (You jokers are probably part of some of them.) There are lots of them that would take the bait when offered funding by CIA operatives posing as wealthy, supposedly sympathetic, benefactors.

Without U.S. Funding (be it through our taxes that are sent to the World Bank, or more direct methods) Al Qaeda would be nothing... less than nothing as far as carrying out a 9/11 style plot on U.S. soil. Some of you folks really need to wake up.









Are we having fun yet?

Panot is right about you, Annonymous75 [I noticed she likes to call you "Phantom75"]. I too wish I am you. But it is bad enough that I cannot be like Larken Rose who praises himself with his own comments using another name or a fake name! Did you see how he loves his picture that always accompanies his writings?  He is a narcessist who falls in love with himself. As you might have read some comments before, this picture is scary to the readers because it reminds them of how Abraham Lincoln's assassin looks like!

Phantom75, you just have to "educate" them. Thanks for being around. I wish I were you.  But I don't have that much knowledge you have to use as a tool in remolding those crooked comments into a straight rod of righteous and correct thinking.

Had this "weird" guy PureTrust accused Benjamin Franklin's Goverment of committing 911 during Franklin's time, cowboy Sheriffs of the olden times would have formed a Posse Comitatus and hang him by a nearby tree.  He is luckly he said this in 2012.  But even then Franklin might be stirring in his grave for what this guy just said about the Government, not Al Qaeda, committing the 911 carnage. Where did he come from ... from another planet?

 If you really believe that Al Qaeda has nothing to do with 911, oh, boy! Again you forgot to take your medicine the doctor had prescribed for your neurosis, and boy, you really need help!

The Government of Franklin's time would not have perpetrated a 9/11 on the people, like our Government did on us, even if they could have. Why not? Because they needed the people too much back then, to strengthen the new Government they had set up.

What those jokers did, however, came close to a paper 9/11. They foisted the stupid Constitution on the people rather than doing what they had been assigned to do, namely, strengthen the Articles of Confederation.

Ever since that time, Government has become a theatrical display, with more and more politicians acting one part before being elected, and then doing something entirely different afterward. In fact, that's the reason we had 9/11, Oklahoma city, and Waco at all... to say nothing about the Civil War.

Mark Curtis' book "Web of Deceit" (about the deceit in the British Government) matches the United State's Government to a tee. But the blame falls on us, the people, for not controlling our evil Government. Part of one review of this book says:

"... So rotten is the system, so riddled with the callous brutality which passes for pragmatism, that Curtis has left himself nowhere to hide. At the time of going to press he has, with the exception of a brief review in the Guardian (well done, that paper!) been largely ignored. Even then, the Guardian review failed to mention any hint of the paper’s own short-comings. Curtis, you see, believes in “the public” - that great mass of us who simply wouldn’t kill people for profit, or not often. ..."
  

Kudos to you Annonymous75. It is really silly for the radical left and for those plain bucket-kickers to quote Benjamin Franklin's favorite line not to give up liberty for a little temporary freedom otherwise you deserve no liberty and freedom. Annonymous75 is right.  There was no 911 before, so Franklin would definitely not have used that line in the Hall of the Pennsylvania Assembly when terrorists were threatening to slash his throat and cut off his head. Thank you Annonymous75 for letting us know that the quote was not even Franklin's ... that it was Richard Jackson who said it first, not Benjie. That's big education to urban hillbillies who would like to throw you under the bus without even knowing what they are doing!

Fly like a butterfly and sting like a bee? Most likely, I have no chance of knowing you Annonymous75. But you are an open book of knowledge. I am always thrilled to read your views, and I appreciate the truth and the shining wisdom of your scholarly discourse. Yours is the bright light of life opposite the bitterness of sick cop-killers trapped in the dark side of life.

This revealing write up is indeed "the other side of the story".  It is for critics of FBI stings that stung them for writing down their intolerant views -- shell opinions of terrorists donkeys meant to be "False Flags for Dummies".

 The last paragraph of this article should read:  

 It is for this reason that our readers shouldn’t be blindsided by a monologue of self-designed propaganda materials published mainly as an outlet of a corked hatred or intolerant bigotry. To know “the other side of the story” is not an option but a crucial imperative. It is even more compelling when to view the other side of the story is to know the truth that I have just demonstrated.