By Sherwood Ross
Eight
universities were in the running to get the Bush Presidential Library
but Hunt Oil Co. head Ray Hunt, of Dallas, an economics major from
Southern Methodist University, co-chaired the SMU search effort and
came out on top. His long time pals-ship with “The Decider” may have
had more than a bit to do with it.
Hunt
has done a lot for Bush and vice-versa. Bush named Hunt in 2001 to his
President’s Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board, and reappointed him
five years later. Hunt also serves on the National Petroleum Council
that gives industry advice to Bush’s Energy Secretary.
An
oilman’s oilman, Hunt is a member of the board of the American
Petroleum Institute and has been showered with awards from the
petroleum sector, including “All-American Wildcatter.” Success in
Oilsville doesn’t get any headier than that.
Now
it turns out Hunt Oil clinched a separate deal last September with Iraq
province Kurdistan he might not have won if he were not Bush’s Good
Buddy. Some think, according to a front page New York Times report July 3, the deal “runs counter to American policy and undercut Iraq’s central government.” Among those who think that way is the Iraq central government.
Hunt
got this free pass to explore Kurdistan’s oil riches last September 8
when he inked an exploration pact, one likely to give him a share of
the boodle of any future gushers. “Hunt would be the first U.S. company
to sign such a deal,” a State Department official told the Times.
And according to reporter Jay Price of McClatchy News Service, the
Iraqi oil minister, speaking for Baghdad, “called the Hunt deal
illegal.”
The
Hunt deal, though, may resemble the national oil law Bush seeks to push
through Parliament. This law, writes Antonia Juhasz, an analyst for
watchdog Oil Change International, would “allow much (if not most) of
Iraq’s oil revenues to flow out of the country and into the pockets of
international companies.”
In an Op-Ed of March 13 last year in The New York Times, Juhasz
wrote if the Bush-backed bill became law the Iraq National Oil Company
would have exclusive control of just 17 of Iraq’s 80 known oil fields,
“leaving two-thirds of known---and all of its as yet
undiscovered-fields open to foreign control.” By contrast, Iran, Saudi
Arabia and Kuwait, “maintain nationalized oil systems and have outlawed
foreign control over oil development,” Juhasz said.
Allowing
the separate Hunt Oil deal---whose details Hunt and the Kurds will not
divulge---will surely benefit the Kurds but fleece most Iraqis, hence
the anger in Baghdad. This gives the lie to
Bush’s statement of March 16, 2003, that “We will make sure that Iraq’s
natural resources are used for the benefit of their owners, the Iraqi
people.” If you count labor unions as people, which Bush apparently
does not, there is a major outcry against Bush’s oil policy.
Meanwhile, the Times reports, the Administration is defending help the U.S. provided in drawing up no-bid contracts
between Iraq’s Oil Ministry and five western oil firms to operate in
other Iraqi oil patches. The U.S. said it provided purely technical
help writing the contracts and played no role in choosing the winners.
Believe that one, if you can. But why no bids again? Whatever happened to free enterprise?
This
is the same crony capitalism that gave Halliburton, formerly headed by
Good Buddy Vice President Cheney, a controversial, multi-billion no-bid
contract to truck oil into Iraq. Halliburton
subsidiary Kellogg, Brown & Root(KBR) also got named sole source
contractor to douse any oil well fires that might break out in Iraq.
KBR landed that no-bid plum even though Army Corps of Engineers
contract chief Bunnatine Greenhouse found there were other qualified
bidders. She was demoted for not signing off on it.
The
Hunt and Halliburton deals offer vivid proof that “crony capitalism,”
not the free market brand, is being practiced divvying up Iraq’s oil
resources and the other spoils of war. This has long been Bush’s modus vivendi. The Wall Street Journal once
noted his Harken Energy Co. acquired exclusive offshore drilling rights
from Bahrain in 1990 even though it had never drilled a single well.
How did Harken get it? Well, Bush’s father at the time occupied the
White House.
Maybe
when SMU puts all the Bush papers on display about why he attacked
Iraq---a war that so far has killed a million souls---it will include
the fine print of the contract Hunt signed with the Kurds. It will show
how high Hunt could rise with a degree in economics from SMU, and how
far Bush would go to sell out the Iraqi people in order to favor a Good
Buddy. Is there anyone who still does not believe the Iraq war about
oil? #
(Sherwood
Ross is a Miami-based writer and public relations consultant. He
formerly worked for the Chicago Daily News and as a columnist for major
wire services. Reach him at sherwoodr1@yahoo.com)