FREEDOM FORUM: Discussion

Make a Comment

Comments in Response


Comment by jimbo
Entered on:

 THIRD PARTY FUCTIONS ARE A DEVICE TO SPLIT THE VOTE.  ALL ANTI-DEMOCRAT/LIBERAL/SOCIALISTS ACTIVITY SHOUDL BE CHANNELED TO TAKE OVER, TAKE BACK THE CURRENT REPUBLICAN PARY AND THROW THE RASCHELS OUT, THE OLD GUARD WHO ARE BOUGHT AND PAID FOR, WHO PLAY THE POLITICAL CORRUPTNESS GAME. tAKE OVER THE REPBULICAN PARTY FOR A UNIFIED EFFORT TO TAKE BACK OUR COUNTRY. WAKE UP AMERICA, I MAY ALREADY BE TOO LATE!!!! nwo engineers all third party efforts for the one simple solution to split the votes and have the welfare/socialiast contingent who vote as they are told to, and put their nwo selected people into power.....


Comment by Freed Radical
Entered on:
The RepublicRAT Party is already a tool of the police state and not worth anyone's time. When the Republican Party offers Ron Paul style candidates in every primary election and an honest voting process, it might be worth considering. Until then, don't bother to vote. It's unethical anyway.

  ERIC NEW


Comment by Rastus Jr
Entered on:

Jimbo, DieBold couts the votes. Only a tool would believe that how you vote matters today. Only a tool would believe there is a difference between the 2 annointed parties. Only a tool would claim that voting on principle is an agenda promoted by the NWO. Tool, troll; take your pick.


Comment by all4thinking
Entered on:

The biggest tool that the major parties have in hand is the constant harping on the splitting the vote message.  It's what keeps them in power -- but only as long as we still keep thinking it's true.  If you actually talk to folks who worry about splitting the votes,  MOST of them say,  "I'd vote for a Libertarian, except that would split the vote and the bad guy will win."  Got news for you; they're all bad guys.  Both major parties are in sync with one another, and NONE of them are looking out for our freedoms.   Vote for what you want; it's the ONLY thing that will get you where you want to go.


Comment by Psychictaxi
Entered on:

How about showing up and we can discuss this issue rationally and with all civility - and you can hear what Barry Hess himself has to say in his own defense, and maybe you will find him a most competent candidate for this office... 

...or maybe you can just sit there on your fat ass and try your damndest to break down what little good is being attempted in this country just so you don't have to wallow in your self-perpetuated misery alone.


Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

All of this political activity is overshadowed by the Social Security/human being partnerships.

When a person says that a Social Security number is his, and when he follows up with what he said by signing documents that indicate the same, he has just put himself under Social Security contractual obligation. Is this partnership ever set aside without formal, legal documentation executed to that effect?

Since the SSN is an identifier of a SS account, saying that the number is yours, virtually puts you into partnership with the SS account identified by the particular SSN.

What a quagmire of legal blah blah. Try to sort out the how the partnership is to act legally, with half of it being a government person and the other half being a free, sovereign human being, and with a partnership between the two trying to elect other partnerships to Government offices. And try to do it without the humans even realizing that such partnerships exist!



Comment by Chris Broughton
Entered on:

Voting is for cowards.

Make a Comment