Comment by Anonymous

Entered on: 6/19/2011 10:12:23 AM

 

You got it all wrong, Mr. Ignatius 

If you have a marriage counselor like this kiss-and-make-up author named Ignatius in the dark side of the Testament, your divorce is a better chance for survival than your continuing relationship of infidelity and betrayal with a partner that holds a dagger behind your back while you are locked in a love-making embrace.

Here is David Ignatius’ advice from the crypt why the Pakis and the United States should continue their treacherous love affair:

1. It’s not surprising that the Pakistanis arrested people suspected as CIA informants on the Osama bin Laden raid and other operations. Working with a foreign intelligence service (even a "friendly" one with good motives) is a no-no in any country. Wrong! Local informants were supposed to be working for the ISI [Pakistani government] in a joint counterterrorist intelligence operations with the C.I.A. [the United States]. They WERE NOT WORKING WITH A FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SERVICE – THEY WERE WORKING FOR PAKISTAN AND THE U.S. in a joint effort to hunt down bin Laden like an animal he deserved, and capture him dead or alive.

2. The author wants the currently created "joint counterterrorism task force" to oversee operations. One goal will be quicker action to avoid tipping off the enemy. This is so dim-witted… totally disconnected from the facts of the case and the reality of the prevailing situation. In the joint counterterrorism operation, Pakistan ALWAYS tips the enemy. The recent Pakis tipping-the-enemy betrayal was a CIA gathered intelligence on "two Taliban bomb factories in the tribal areas and the June 4 Pakistani assault". Tippped by the Pakis, the enemy knew since Adams what was coming.

C’mon, Ignatius … The Pakis were not hunting down bin Laden and his assassins – a naïve person that you are who represents a tailor’s dummy thought they were – on the contrary, they were harboring, hiding and protecting him and his dealy elks. Do you think that in this treacherous relationship had the U.S. informed the Pakis that we have located bin Laden, killing him would have been possible? The Pakis would not have only tipped the terror fox – the Pakis would have protected him to the last armed fighting man they have.

3. According to this guy the United States compromised Pakistan’s sovereignty and independence when we violated Paki air space during the bin Laden raid. When we conducted the raid, Pakistan had already positioned itself as the enemy of the United States. The Pakis were harboring, hiding and protecting bin Laden and his cordon of killers that we were looking for many years, and they were also supposed to be looking for. If we attack the enemy from the air – the SEAL commandoes swooped down bin Laden's compound from the air -- how can one be so stupid in accusing us that we violated the enemy’s airspace? We were attacking the enemy from the air, dude ...

According to this guy theUnited States compromised Pakistan’s sovereignty and independence when we violated Paki air space during the bin Laden raid. When we conducted the raid, Pakistan had already positioned itself as the enemy of the United States. The Pakis were harboring, hiding and protecting bin Laden and his cordon of killers that we were looking for many years, and they were also supposed to be looking for. If we attack the enemy from the air – the SEAL commandoes swooped down bin Laden's compound from the air -- how can one be so stupid in accusing us that we violated the enemy’s airspace? We were attacking the enemy from the air, dude ...

There are maybe a hundred more garbage from this political marriage counselor’s disastrous advice that in this treacherous relationship, for the U.S. to divorce the Pakis is, needless for me to say, for the United States' survival!