This is an anti-cop thuggery.

I don’t love cops more than I love my country, but thugs in the Media targeting cops are no worse than rogue publishers sponsoring and editors endorsing an anti-cop propaganda campaign that harms the public, especially when it is being done to promote an ideological agenda.

Read the comments under this headline. The public is pissed off being fed with craps. "Prison guards are not cops. But close enough I guess if you are trying your best to make cops look bad."

The anti-cop stories in this headline are summed up in this propaganda blitz putting cops in a bad light: "Nationally, the police are a criminal gang with paperwork, and that’s all there is to it."

The public is doped with false stories that cops are bad. Surf the Web. You will stumble upon stories how websites are used to discredit the nation’s law enforcement officers who are doing their job to catch criminals. Click on Google.com. Read Part I: 'SWAT' Killed A Rogue Ex-Marine .... not an "American hero".not an "".

@"JV":  Wearing the MASK of a "Cop-lover" today, eh?  You are really cute.  I mean, really.  Cops are working for for-profit corporations in The Prison Industrial Complex, guards are part of that profiteering complex (pro-nazi).  Utah is already working on prison labor profiteering.   Yes, it is sad that the war on drugs allows them to entrap slaves that give them funding longer, but you feel sorry for these guys who are aiding the drug-trade while profiteering from prosecuting it.  They are the same animal.  A drug user had to fill me in on this.  (As if you didn't know...)  I still say that you are a phony, who won't tell me how I am supposed to know you.  But you attack me as if you think you know me or know people that YOU THINK know me that you assume aren't gangstalking predators... So now you try to look like a "cop-lover" to throw everyone off scent?   Come on JV.  A little arrogant of you don't you think?  People are smarter than you give them credit for.

I "googled" this Part I: 'SWAT' Killed A Rogue Ex-Marine .... not an "American hero" in the Internet and discovered myself this dirt on "rogue" publishers and editors who "admire" themselves in their own website, and sell it to advertisers! It is an interesting reading. How powerful is the clear writing of this award-winning journalist, caught up by Google.com really reels me.

I am thankful Freedom Forum runs it here, for FP.com readers to know. Thanks also to JV for discovering it first and bringing it here.

The author of this Part I: 'SWAT' Killed A Rogue Ex-Marine …expose’ revealed an interesting discussion on the subject of the Freedom of the Press against the right of a publisher to use the website he owns in a way inimical to public interest, to promote his own personal agenda.

For the "interest" of the public, I hope this space should be cleared of nuisance intervention and lunar badmouthing like this one below that is so disconnected anyway, to give way to others who can pose a sane view or at least contribute a sensible and coherent commentary.

In this eye-catching case, it is the Alternative Media, run by "rogue" publishers owning websites treated as private properties that was corrupted, not the cops.

Reposted without computer glitz.

In this eye-catching Guerena case, it is the Alternative Media, run by “rogue” publishers owning  websites treated as private properties that was corrupted, not the cops.

I tried to analyze Part I: 'SWAT' Killed A Rogue Ex-Marine .... not an "American hero"  written by an award-winning journalist Edwin Sumcad read in Google.com by worldwide viewers.  I have the experience to do it. Before I retired, I spent my media career in many capacities. As a media analyst, this portion of the article attracts my attention: An editor who acts in behalf of the owner of the publication cannot in writing, humiliate or defame a writer who is opposed to his opinion, which the public has the right to know, before deleting his account. He can be legally held accountable in the court of law once that defamation or falsehood causes injury.

I just want to point out one of the acts that constitute defamation per se which many “rogue” publishers and editors mentioned in the article have been held liable: “Attacks on a person’s professional character or standing.”

 If the person of a professional writer is attacked by his own publisher or editor, the latter could be liable.

Many actionable cases of this kind succeed and fail at the same time. It is to be determined in Court if the accused publisher or editor is stating a fact proven to be false and malicious, or merely expressing an opinion in which case he is not liable.

In one case, a court ruling held that: “If your employer calls you a pathological liar, it is far less likely to be regarded as opinion than if such a statement is made by somebody you just met.” The result is conviction.

In this website, I recall that the editor attacked the professional standing of a contributing writer under his editorial charge who did not conform to his opinion, which was uncalled for. He also called him names which was totally unnecessary.

This headline "This Week’s Corrupt Cops Stories" is a form of Media thuggery. There is no doubt about it. Isolated stories of "misbehaving" cops have been collected and presented to the public to libel all cops as "corrupt". Media thugs have a holiday in presenting to the public this kind of falsified report -- abuse of peace officers they wanted to shoot on sight if they could, if not with a gun, with a pen.

"Media thuggery"— Ay, little Chihuahua, beware of wild tigers in the Media! If what you are saying is true, isn’t that dirt falling under the mad editor’s nose about to devour you?

Ufactdirt, you can say anything you want but a Lilliputian mind that thinks he stands ten feet tall doesn’t scare a heartbeat of me. I am David. I have my slingshot.

O.K.doookeee, but editors are also humans. They could snap anytime and turn themselves into ...

I checked your legal background and I know that you are an experienced lawyer, but just a word of caution, to be always in the safe side, that’s all.

@Ufactdirt:  Who is a lawyer?... not Joseph Vanderville.  I checked the AZ bar registry, no such name...  Who are you talking about?  JV has been slandering me on this site... and I think he is a phony wearing a mask.  Kim Dyer  ... also, I wouldn't call a "lawyer' anything but a minion for the Queen.  They serve the queen.  "Esq." and "barrister" are terms for pseudo-British 'nobility.'  (Where the world banks are joined at the financial capitol in London).  Banks allied to their moneychanging/laundering churches:  Vatican and Mormon masonic cult. 

(He claims he knows someone who knows me... who is slandering me on this page as needing "medical attention"...  also states my story is "laughable" when I had my father murdered within less than 24 hours of the DOJ RICO department receiving my RICO Complaint against Tempe, and my Grandmother Ruth Mary Sinclair died the DAY I sat with Mayor Ed Foster of Quartsite.  She had sudden, never had before "seizures" so violent that she couldn't breath, and died that day at 90.  Ruth Mary SINCLAIR of the Sinclairs of Rosslyn, Scottland current enemy to the Crown-world banking headquarters).  So you want to treat people like they aren't smart enough to see that Kennedy passed 1961 RICO act to protect us from BANKSTER racketeering?  (aka 9/11 profiteering).  I guess that he needed medical attention too, eh?  Severe "medical" attention.  I am not afraid of your thugery threats you two-faced arrogant little phony.  Tell us your real name and who are you JV.  Still waiting.  Are you Shelton?  Also Ufactdirt, what is your real name?  Are you guys willing to tell us who you really are and be accountable for what you claim to be true or fact on here?  Or are you trying to get people to believe what they would prefer to beLIEve to be true to cover criminal racketeering asses who raped our society with RICO?

Here I am again, my name removed (Kim Dyer #44164) proving that Ufactdirt was trying to get us to buy that Joseph Vanderville is an attorney using his real name, where I looked him up, so he is using a fake name.  A law degree?  Sure.  I say J. Marc Victor.  He's been going after me on this site since I first attended Breakfast Club a year ago.  So safe to say that it is J. Marc Victor who advertises with Freedomsphoenix?  And got Jason Shelton 4409 $28k from Scottsdale Risk Management?   Notice the numerology for the settlement is 1?  my old number used to be that Ernie took away?  There is power in the ritual.  I've been learning a lot about it. The cabbalists love that stuff.  They use certain codes all over the place.  they are the BANKSTERS and cartel minions.  They serve the queen and the royal families that have ruled this country for years.

J. Marc, Victor, care to fess up?  In which state are you registered with the bar?  Certainly not under your fake name Joseph Vanderville that at one point I proved to be JVdeville changed...  32 deville (as in Cruella Deville) your mind control about my family's history with freemasonry isn't working.  I am not worried about being miss popular.  It isn't about me.  Freemasonry has turned evil, if it ever was a good thing.  It was originally supposedly Christian and taken over.  Now gangster jews control it, as does Illuminati official 300 at the top.  Yes, the controllers of the Federal Reserve who hijacked the grail agenda of Rosslyn and its descendants.