Living (and Dying) Under Drones
• http://www.counterpunch.org, by ANDREW COCKBURNLast week, the Obama Administration argued in front of the First Circuit Court of Appeals that there is no official evidence we are waging drone warfare in northern Pakistan.
Oh for heaven's sake, do your homework! A "drone" is nothing but a radio-controlled model airplane! Such have been used, to limited extent, by the military ever since World War One. The largest of them today is barely a fraction the size of a manned plane, and has a correspondingly tiny bomb-load: no more than one small guided missile apiece, nothing compared to a manned bomber, let alone a whole-flight airstrike or an artillery barrage. This is why they're usually used for camera-spying rather than actual attacks.
Yes, there was a strategy of using them for smart-missile pin-point bombing, but it hasn't worked very well -- precisely because the missiles were supposed to be guided by beacons, which were planted by native informants, who proved to be totally untrustworthy. Remember that a machine can do only what it's told to do, and when the information it's given is bad, it's performance will be the same.
That's the whole story with Those Evil-Evil Drones. All the rest is the result of propaganda and tactical rumor-mongering. The real reason why the Arabs and their sympathizers are howling for pity-pity
about "drones" is that they *work*. They're very good at aerial spying, and can be used well for pinpoint bombing -- but the target has to be verified by something better than a local Arab with a grudge.
By the way, a particular weakness of drones is that they're much easier than manned planes to shoot down. A single shooter with a good rifle can do it. Think about that.
--Leslie