CONNECTING THE DOTS
Hancock versus Wooldridge: overpopulation in America—numbers do matter
Frosty WooldridgeHancock noted that many readers feel so infuriated or intimidated by my commentaries on FreedomsPhoenix, he created a “delete” button they could engage to block any of my columns from their view. That won't stop reality!
You know? Frosty is kinda right that we won't save ourselves with technology. To see it, compare a picture of yourself from ten years ago with what stares back at you out of the mirror today. Probably technology won't advance enough to save any of us, each from our own personal demise.
But Ernie is kinda right, too. Most of us who are over 50 today, will not be around when overpopulation and dying off of species of plants and animals becomes a problem. And when these things DO become a really serious problem, the thing that will happen is that the personal demise of each individual person just might come about a little sooner than it would have otherwise.
It is quite altruistic of Frosty to continue trying to save some future population by reducing the present population now... all because he loves people. And Frosty's topic of overpopulation is simply another thing to add to the myriad political problems that are bothering us now. Ernie, at least, is concerned with the whole political picture. And Ernie is doing it to help his descendants to be able to live in the land. Or at least he has expressed this in the past.
Personally, for the present, I don't view Frosty's points as an immediate problem. The immediate problem is the way the department of Homeland Security is going to handle population extermination in the present: FEMA camps and mass executions.
[[This fact remains whether Mr. Hancock, my friend, likes it or not. I am a Galileo of the 21st century on this overpopulation issue. Hancock may be the “Pope” of the 1600s now in the 21st century speaking out against me and inanely arguing with me, but we all know what became “self-evident” between the pope and Galileo. My work will become just as self-evident no matter how much Hancock stands in denial of reality. Hancock cannot run from it or hide from it or deny it for very long. None of us can continue our self-deluded charade of endless expansion. How's it working for all the obese people in this country?]]
Duh, I'm the Leonardo da Vinci of Planet Earth and I say that Wooldridge's fantasies about the future are moose hockey, because nobody can predict the future, and anybody who bets against people being smart enough to solve their own problems usually loses, if the people are not hampered by prejudices that is.
If Frosty hates overpopulation so much, why doesn't he jump on the Gay Train and advocate that all children be indoctrinated into pansexuality so that they can be told by the govt. later that heterosexual marriage is illegal without a special breeder's permit, and if they do a gay marriage it's tax deductible? :) Oh yes, they're almost already doing it :)
http://historyscopers-gay-watch.blogspot.com/2013/04/gay-agenda-really-about-turning-kids.html
I guess then that the overpop. problem's solved, and Hancock was right :)
The real truth is probably that Frosty is a white supremacist and hates them 100 million Mexicans just over that weakening wall of apartheid, and has tried to study how Rome fell and found out about the pesky Goths and got black white and white black or something. Actually, the Goths only wanted to peacefully settle and become Roman citizens, only to be massacred and/or enslaved time and again until they conquered their way in, and were hesitantly handed citizenship. Yes, they did unite with the "real" Latin Romans to fight off the Huns, then used the weakened state of the Latins to take over and split the empire up, and nobody has been able to restore it to this day. Even the Goths had their chance to set up a New Roman Empire with equal rights for Latins, but blew it, so that's what I mean by prejudice being the main enemy.
Speaking of prejudice. Is the U.S. next? Not with my MEGAMERGE DISSOLUTION SOLUTION of proactively annexing Mexico as 10 new states in a phased manner with the consent of the Mexican people, dropping the white supremacist b.s. and uniting with them to share the New World in peace and prosperity. So millions of them are backward peasants? We got them in Appalachia too but it's working out. We gain all that new territory, and a safer securer border on the Mexican coasts where we can set up new military bases. After millions of "gringos" move south, a lot of piss-poor Mexicans might be overnight millionaires selling or leasing their lands for whole new cities, make way for the Beaner Hillbillies.
Combined with a firm policy to prohibit believers in the Quran from immigrating, we're going to see prosperous days ahead, and who cares if the total pop. goes to a billion, we're going to be benefitting from robots and nanotechnology to live in ease with the govt. paying us not to work, so what better place to live and party than New California and New Florida on the Mexican coasts? Just so we don't have any *!?! jihadists setting off bombs in our midst, Oh Clinton, Bush, and Obama You Have Messed Us Up Bigtime but you too shall pass.
http://tinyurl.com/megamergeblog
Frosty is a bicycle guy, plain and simple. What does this mean? Let me paint the picture. This means that Frosty has cycled through the county, the hamlets, the villages, the towns, the cities, and the really big cities.
How much can you see when you bicycle through all these places? However much, it is a lot less than someone who spends the same amount of time driving in a car through it all. And it is a lot more than someone who spends the same amount of time sitting behind a computer.
The morning air can be exhilarating... especially if it is frosty... and especially if you are on a bike, out in the country, free like the birds. The city is ugly and unnatural compared with the country, and the city literally stinks - even the smaller cities. So, why would anyone want larger populations?
The thing that Frosty missed is the vast panoramas of the open spaces he would have been made to realize exist, if he had driven all that bicycle-riding time in a car. To be sure, the little details of either the city or the country are much more evident from the bicycle. Why? because you don't pass them as fast. You have more time to take them in.
The problem is, the details are like the trees that block your view of the forest - you can't see the forest for the trees.
The size of the land is so enormous, and the natural resources so vast, that there is NO CHANCE that people can RUN OUT OF ROOM for at least decades, and probably hundreds of years to come.
This doesn't mean that man can't decimate the land if he goes wild. After all, it didn't take sports hunters very long to almost kill off all the buffalo. But with moderate care, the lands and resources will last a long time... many generations. The problem isn't the population. The problem is hemming the population in.
The answer is to break the big cities down. Spread the people out in the land. Let them learn first hand how they need to preserve the lands, because spread out, they will need to do it just to be able to live comfortably. Get rid of things like Agenda 21.
But if you don't free the people up to own the lands, they will free themselves up, in big surges, once they realize that there isn't any protection in big cities from Boston Bombers... or from the armies run by the U.S. Government terrorists.
Who are those idiots posting their comments? Overpopulation is the major problem on Planet Earth. But let them overpopulate and their children will die from the earth fighting back. Let's party like there is no tomorrow. Then nothing is left, except people starving to death and cockroaches eating their bones.