Comment by Henry Bowman

Entered on: 6/3/2013 4:52:46 PM

Seriously, why does anybody think this is a big deal? If they had matched this guy's fingerprints with an older crime, it would have been just another day shift. As long as they can only take a DNA swab in the same circumstances that they can take your fingerprints, this should have no practical effect on anybody's rights.

Comment by Powell Gammill

Entered on: 6/3/2013 6:20:36 PM

Scalia votes with minority and issues separate scathing opinion:

http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/03/supreme-court-sanctions-warrantless-dna-collection-from-arrestees/

Comment by Stupid Amerkin

Entered on: 6/4/2013 2:55:33 AM

The SC is just as nazi criminal and out of control  as all the rest.

Comment by Powell Gammill

Entered on: 6/4/2013 9:34:27 PM

Supreme Court Approves Involuntary DNA Samples From Suspects And Opens The Door To A Massive DNA Databank http://jonathanturley.org/2013/06/04/supreme-court-approves-involuntary-dna-samples-from-suspects-and-opens-the-door-to-a-massive-dna-databank/

The Slippery Swab (Update)

http://blog.simplejustice.us/2013/06/04/the-slippery-swab.aspx