First, you have the right to privacy, with an Amendment to tell the Government, hands off!

Then you gave up the right when you applied for permission to drive when you legally didn't need to do it. See Jack McLamb's info at http://www.realtruth.biz/driving/supremecourt.htm.

Then "they" made laws and court cases that stated that you have the right to certain privacy inside the permission that they gave. Yet, because the laws and court cases don't state every instance of when the right to privacy must be upheld, "they" often jump back to the permission they gave you, and you agreed with - the license - as the allowance for them to invade your privacy.

So, what you do next is take them to court on it. And if you win, your permission is strengthened in the direction of your rights a bit. Of course, for all you know, they might have hidden in some law or court case that permission rights are subject to the whim of some judge or lawmaker.

Why don't you step out of the permission thing, and simply travel by right, rather than licensing your car and yourself, which licensing is not required by law per the Supreme court decisions listed in the cases at the above link?