FREEDOM FORUM: Discussion

Make a Comment

Comments in Response


Comment by PureTrust
Entered on:

The definition is in the word "terrorist."

If the Federal Government did NOT do anything good or bad for the people of the country directly, would they be more like or unlike terrorists? Seems to me that when Fed Gov moves to tax people without the direct need to fight a foreign enemy who is literally attacking, the people of Fed Gov have become terrorists.

There are lots of little ways (and some not so little) that Fed Gov is being used by the people withing it to mess with the common people of the nation. The BLM/Bundy issue is another (besides taxes) example.

The Federal Government was created for one basic reason. It was created to fight off foreign entities who were attacking the country. A second reason was to settle in-the-country disturbances, mostly disputes between the States. A third thing might be to help the States when natural disaster became overwhelming.

Things that it was NOT supposed to do were to hand over the money control to a "Federal Reserve Bank," a central bank that is mostly dominated by owners who are of foreign countries. It is was not supposed to trick the people into joining Social Security so that it could claim that it had made an agreement with the people that it was required to fulfill.

So, who are the real terrorists? Aren't they the crooks inside the Federal Government? Isn't Sarah Palin right when she says that terrorists should be baptized by waterboarding? It's simply that she isn't considering who the terrorists really are. And, perhaps she is one of them. Sounds like she is by the way she wants to continue the crimes of the people in Fed Gov. Does she know it, that she is a terrorist?

Make a Comment