"In October 21 2011, after a lengthy investigation by DEA’s offices in Detroit, including listening to phone conversations between cartel leaders and Tata, the DEA had his truck stopped by a trooper on a highway near Detroit. A surprised and fragile Sharp, asked: “What’s going on, officer? At age 87, I want to know why I’m being stopped.”" So, did the DEA have a warrant to listen in on these calls? Did they have a warrant to pull over Sharp's truck? Obviously not. Could they have gotten a warrant based upon their listening in on the calls? Obviously, they certainly had time and they have the black robed rubber stamps set up specifically to facilitate such. But they didn't. Why? Instead they order a State Trooper to do an illegal pull over and detain Sharp. Do not answer the question above as to why he was being detained. And then illegally search his vehicle with no cause with a drug dog. And the judiciary approves of their impotent bypassed non-role. Amerika. Place your bets the wiretaps were illegal and part of the NSA. Brought to you by the guys arming the cartels so they can use easy guns as a pretext to seize and prohibit yours. All with the blessings of the black robed pirates those guardians of your Rights. And based upon the reporter whose story you just read complete lack of interest in this don't count of the corporate media to mention Rights and remedies for their infringement either.