Comment by Powell Gammill

Entered on: 11/18/2011 9:21:22 PM

Why Can't Ron Paul Have a Media Boomlet?

http://news.yahoo.com/why-cant-ron-paul-media-boomlet-125232658.html

Zogby: GOP voters ‘don’t like the dog food,’ turn Ron Paul into early-state contender

http://news.yahoo.com/zogby-gop-voters-don-t-dog-food-turn-205606002.html

Comment by Venancio Tan

Entered on: 11/20/2011 1:51:49 AM

With my apology to die-hard Ron Paul supporters, how about looking at it this way: 89 minutes is TOO long a Media coverage for any "unelectable" candidate.

Millions of Americans, not just a handful of militant followers, endorse this fairness of ignoring Ron Paul in order to save money, time and energy. Whatever mysterious report there is that Ron Paul wins certain number of votes, the Main Stream Media is naturally not interested. The Alternative Media will not also endorse or publish a candidate knowing that the public is aware that such candidate cannot be elected anyway. It is just a futile exercise. Besides, the Media fears that their ratings will go down.

It is time to accept this reality check which shows fairness in dealing with Ron Paul as an "unelectable" candidate.