Freedom Forum

Welcome to the Freedom Forum of Freedom's Phoenix!

Freedom reigns here like the days of the old Wild West! We have no corporate or government censors to tell you what you can and cannot say in our public forums. We encourage everyone to keep a civil tongue, but you are free to express your opinions no matter what your perspective is on any subject -- just be prepared for someone else to have an entirely opposite view and tell the world you don't know what you are talking about!

Some entries, which our regular editors consider too vulgar -- according to their standards, may be tagged "Crude or Lewd" so the faint-of-mind folks don't have to view them, but everyone can use the link on the right-hand column to decide for themselves whether to show those entries or not.

Anyone may read the discussions shown in our forum. You will need to sign-up as a member and provide your name and valid email address to be able to add comments and participate in the discussions. There is no cost to join.

Now, join the party and have some real fun!


LIST OF DISCUSSIONS AND COMMENTS



Date Entered
Headline or Topic of Discussion / Comments
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-23 08:18
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
How about Adam Kokesh for President (https://kokeshforpresident.com/) with one variation. Shut the Federal Government down after all the States formally agree to the basic principles of the Constitution and Amendments as they stand. This gives the States control over the only two things that the Federal has legitimate control over: banking and borders. At the same time, it maintains our right to private property - our land, our families, our bodies, etc.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-23 05:11
Make a Comment
Entered by: peterjane2727
thats great checkout: https://www.delta.exchange/futures-guide-bitcoin/
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-23 04:24
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
He will still be forcing people to pay for other people's wants.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-21 13:59
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
No. Those who want our obedience are uncivil, so mass uncivil disobedience is our future.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-19 14:23
Make a Comment
Entered by: chris gill
Well the serfs of Virginia got what they voted for. And must live with the results. The Democraps wanted to ban or at least greatly restrict the peons of the US from owning any gun. Who ever heard of any master allowing their slaves owning guns? Yet they were foolish enough to vote them in to a point of majority power in all houses plus the governor palace. When they stifle the protest this time with the power of the now socialist state, Antifa goons to ensure trouble is to be had and finally the MSM who are nothing but socialist progressive liberal democrat party hacks. They will use that to enact even more laws to disarm the smelly masses they so distrain.
Article
01-17-2020
1 COMMENT
2020-01-17 15:33
Make a Comment
Entered by: Anonymous
These are poorly written. A more direct militant approach should be taken: forbid all vaccines without testing with a control group over a course of 10 years. forbid as a public nuisance and safety hazard all "multiple" immunization doses. forbid all adjuvents in vaccines as a public nuisance forbid all vaccines which do not immunize against an infectious disease as a corrupt practice/claim forbid any requirement that any person must be vaccinated This level of militancy is the most efficient solution, the entire industry is corrupt and should effectively be banned. This will do it, but research and voluntary "real" vaccination is not proscribed. yrs, Michael Mandeville
1 COMMENT
2020-01-17 01:40
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
If Trump was really about "caring for the common man" he would have dissolved the FBI by now.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-15 10:13
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
This Virginia gun problem has been going on for a while now. Why haven't the people of Virginia recalled their government people through impeachment or referendum? Why haven't the people of Virginia, either in groups or individually, sued their government people individually for using government to harm them (if only through threat, so far) illegally? "Guns" isn't the problem. Corruption done by government people is the problem. Guns is only the way government people are proving their corruption and illegality.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-15 10:02
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Bitcoin absolutely is financially viable in the long run. Why? Because it remains within a decentralized mining market. The idea that it costs $1000 to mine a single bitcoin is irrelevant. Why? Because when it costs too much in electricity and equipment resources to mine, miners will stop mining. When this happens, the value will go up because of the scarcity. Then mining will become viable, again, and the miners will start to mine again, thereby stabilizing the Bitcoin value. There are other factors that will keep Bitcoin popular. One of them is that other companies are making side-chains that are connected to the Bitcoin blockchain. Take a look at the Omni Layer - https://www.omnilayer.org/. These other companies will keep Bitcoin alive for a long time by making it practical OUTSIDE OF ITSELF.
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-14 17:00
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Revelation 12:4a: "Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth." Revelation 12:8: "But he was not strong enough, and they lost their place in heaven." --- Bible >>> We are missing a third of the angels in the skies, because they were flung to the earth by Satan. They followed him to the earth when he lost his place in heaven (space). The angels are the powers that hold the universe in place. Satan thought that by removing a third of the forces that held the universe in place, he could destroy the universe. But Jesus held the universe in place, without the angels. --- Anybody who tries to explain the "stuff" in the video, without taking the Bible and God into account, is moving into astrology, and really doesn't know what he is talking about.
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-14 16:58
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Revelation 12:4a: "Its tail swept a third of the stars out of the sky and flung them to the earth." Revelation 12:8: "But he was not strong enough, and they lost their place in heaven." --- Bible >>> We are missing a third of the angels in the skies, because they were flung to the earth by Satan. They followed him to the earth when he lost his place in heaven (space). The angels are the powers that hold the universe in place. Satan thought that by removing a third of the forces that held the universe in place, he could destroy the universe. But Jesus held the universe in place, without the angels. --- Anybody who tries to explain the "stuff" in the video, without taking the Bible and God into account, is moving into astrology, and really doesn't know what he is talking about.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-14 11:03
Make a Comment
Entered by: Joeyman9
So, we killed a guy who was responsible for a lot of deaths; for some reason I see that as a positive. If nothing else is there any doubt at all he would be responsible for even more deaths in the future if allowed to go on?
1 COMMENT
2020-01-14 10:33
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Look in the article above, for the words: "... the man identified in the order." If the order doesn't include the word "man" with reference to the person identified in the order, it is not the man who is identified. And even if it DOES include "man," it still might not be the particular man who is identified. The named person is a created person, created by some attorney and/or judge. This person is on paper. It is designed to entrap the man into accepting that he is the person on the paperwork, so that they (the courts) have authority over him. If the woman is being harassed by the man, she should file a claim (not a complaint) of harassment against the man, and require payment from him, and/or jail time, for the wrong that he, a man, did to her, a woman. --- A person on paperwork is not a man/woman.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-11 14:09
Make a Comment
Entered by: DelCartero
Have they perhaps known about this "flaw" for quite some time, but now fear Iranian hackers could exploit it for their own purposes?
Article
01-10-2020
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-10 14:48
Make a Comment
Entered by: chris gill
If they tried to turn around why does the drawing show no evidence of a turn around? If it was not a air to air missal why are they holding the black boxes? If it was an engin fire why is the climb rate not indicate that? Were is the radio audio of the pilots declaring an emergency .
1 COMMENT
2020-01-10 13:50
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
Here's some more you can control, if you know how to control, that is: http://stopthepirates.blogspot.com/.
Reference
01-08-2020
1 COMMENT
2020-01-08 06:06
Make a Comment
Entered by: FiddleFlapper
I don't feel this should be on Freedom's Phoenix personally... but that's not my call. Congress wont worry about redistricting as they have since the beginning. There were supposed to be a ratio of a specific number of people to a congressman... that number has been increased ever since the US was created. Which means as more and more people exist, there is less and less representation of the populace because the representatives do not increase, they just absorb the increase of people into the districts already present. Lets not make it about a party. Lets make it about Liberty and Individual sovereignty. Republicans could care less about it just like Democrats. They just want to maintain power.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-06 08:32
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
China is destroying itself and its people. Christians go to Heaven for eternity. People who are not Christians go to Hell for eternity.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-06 08:26
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
I don't trust Ron Paul. Consider. How many years was Ron Paul in government office? And he hasn't stopped being a politician even after he was out of government. But in all this, he hasn't, yet, explained that the courts can be accessed by men and women rather than persons. And that there is great strength in accessing the courts this way. --- RP has written books about the economy and money, gold and silver. But he hasn't explained that bank ledgers show that all bank loans are deposits of the promissory note into an account, and then a withdrawal of the money, which is given to the borrower as a loan >>> meaning the borrower paid off his loan before it was even loaned to him. Google "Tom Schauf," a former bank CPA.
Article
01-06-2020
1 COMMENT
2020-01-06 06:54
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
A state of war is simply a State of antagonism that doesn't have any borders. Generally States of countries have borders. States of war could, depending on the way the state of war is set up. But they don't really. The way things are going, some of the States of the United States might become states of war with other States.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-06 06:39
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
The U.N. breaks national law all the time by even suggesting that there is something like international law that nations are subject to. Anybody can break a contract for any or no reason. It's called sovereignty. If somebody does this, let's see who is stronger. The one who breaks the contract, or the ones who don't.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-05 07:06
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
"On the basis of that assurance but still leery, the American people approved the deal, but only on the condition that the Constitution would be amended immediately after being approved." That statement is nonsense. The "American" people approved of nothing. It was jammed down their throats from day one. Be leery of someone who tells you what people 240 years ago were thinking.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-05 07:05
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
"2. Americans were free to decide for themselves what to do with their own money." The author seems to have forgotten about the Whiskey Rebellion. "9. No national-security state, foreign military bases, or foreign interventionism." Except that the "U.S.government" has spent 96% of it's history making war. “A lie which is half a truth is ever the blackest of lies” – Alfred Lord Tennyson "The measure of the state's success is that the word anarchy frightens people, while the word state does not." - Joseph Sobran
1 COMMENT
2020-01-04 03:56
Make a Comment
Entered by: Anonymous
This sort of "semi-satirical" reporting is fascinating! It deftly interweaves physical truth with truth of a different kind. You can already hear the howls of leftists driven into a fury by such "fake but accurate" news. ^_^
Article
01-03-2020
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-04 03:27
Make a Comment
Entered by: Anonymous
Ed, I have to ask. How many drugs did you do before you wrote that comment? Joby weeks is most definitely is a real person, the judge was pretty spot on with his analysis of the flight risk. Which, if I were in joby's shoes especially with that much time hanging over my head, a newborn daughter and his EXTENSIVE resources- I'd be contacting my buddy Sir Richard and chartering a Space X flight off the planet. I have known Joby since elementary school and honestly have a very hard time believing he knowingly and purposefully was trying to defraud so many people of money. Most likely got caught up in something he wasn't FULLY aware of and hopefully this doesn't take a father from his daughter for her entire childhood. Joby is a good guy- don't believe everything you read or hear
1 COMMENT
2020-01-03 11:27
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ernest Hancock
He's still around,... yep, that's all I have to say.
Article
01-03-2020
2 COMMENTS
2020-01-03 08:56
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
So, some judge got together with some other people in government, and invented a person and gave it the name "Jobadiah Sinclair Weeks," and called it a defendant. Then they detained a man based on what they declared in their invented-person paperwork. Weeks, the man, probably doesn't realize that they weren't talking about him at all until he accepts that the invented-person is him. If Weeks stands as a man and makes his claim right in their case, he converts the court to his court, thereby showing that he isn't a defendant.
1 COMMENT
2020-01-01 09:03
Make a Comment
Entered by: Ed Martin
Calling bad actors "government" does not help. Call bad actors and their actions by their proper names. Also, call those who raised the bad actors by their proper name. It's way past time to shame the rot out of immoral people.
1 COMMENT
2019-12-30 08:32
Make a Comment
Entered by: Bob Podolsky
Here's my take on this as a lifelong scientist. https://creative-consulting-services.com/?p=222
News
12-24-2019
1 COMMENT
2019-12-24 21:57
Make a Comment
Entered by: PureTrust
In the beginning of the Revelation at the end of the Bible, John saw the glorified Jesus. He describes what Jesus looked like, Revelation chapter 1, "... a robe reaching down to his feet and with a golden sash around his chest. 14The hair on his head was white like wool, as white as snow, and his eyes were like blazing fire. 15His feet were like bronze glowing in a furnace, and his voice was like the sound of rushing waters." I wonder if John noticed that Jesus limped, Genesis 3:15: "And I will put enmity between you and the woman, and between your offspring and hers; he will crush your head, and you will strike his heel."