LETTER TO THE EDITOR
to receive the Freedom's Phoenix Headlines by Email.
HELP FUND FREEDOM'S PHOENIX!
Make a one-time or periodic contribution.
Use your credit card or PayPal account.
Join us on our
Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:
A letter to ClearChannel's Phoenix Station KFYI
Letter Written by:
Date of Letter: 2009-08-22
From: Lyndon O
Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 9:40 AM
Subject: "The Libertarians" and the VFW rifle
You and Barry are making some
excellent observations on a variety of subjects this morning, but I must take
exception to the repeated cheap shots at "the Libertarians" on the matter of the
recent rifle publicity stunt at the VFW Convention.
I'm sure that you and
Barry are strong supporters of Second Amendment gun rights, and you weren't
comfortable with having your position on that issue "represented", so to speak,
by this stunt, even though the people behind it share your convictions on gun
rights in general. Likewise, please realize that not all libertarians, either
with a small or a capital "L", thought it was a wise move either. And the stunt
was arranged by two individuals, acting on their own, who happened to be
libertarian activists; it was not an official act of the Libertarian Party. Why
is it wrong for the mainstream media to exploit this stunt to link Americans who
support gun rights with racists and loonies, but it's perfectly OK for you and
Barry to use the same stunt to suggest that "the libertarians" are all out to
It's a marvel of hypocrisy that KFYI hosts in general, and
Limbaugh and Hannity in particular, have been delivering daily anti-Obama
commentaries, eloquently extolling the principles of free enterprise and limited
government, but these same individuals treated Ron Paul as a non-person while he
was running for president, even as a Republican, and Ron Paul was actually walking the walk, not only making even more eloquent speeches for limited
government but matching that with his specific proposals and his own track
record in congress. Apparently, on conservative talk radio, it's fine to talk
in general platitudes about free enterprise and limited government, but not to
put any of that seriously into practice, and even the word "libertarian" is not
to be mentioned unless it can be done in a context that deprecates all who use
the term to describe themselves or their political philosophy.
the thinking behind ignoring libertarians 99.9% of the time, and devoting the
remaining .1% to patronizing overgeneralizations? Why are you less offended by
eight years of Bush and Cheney making a mockery of your "limited government"
principles than by those who live up to those principles but do so
outside of the mainstream hierarchy of the Republican Party? If you really have principles and you're driven by them, why not give credit--and
criticism--where it's due when it comes to those principles? If you disagree
with Libertarians as a group or as a party on particular issues, that's fine,
but why the systematic kid-glove treatment of hypocritical mainstream
Republicans and the consistent, snide dismissals of the people who practice what
you yourselves preach?
Thanks for considering these
Editor: Ernest Hancock
(This was the note that accompanied the email sent to the Radio Station)
I thought you might want to read
the e-mail I just sent to Michele Larson, Barry Young's co-host on his KFYI
morning show, addressing their comments about your recent political "statement"
at the VFW convention.
For whatever it's worth, I was one of the founders
of the Arizona Libertarian Party in 1973, and I've been a registered Libertarian
since I was first able to vote, with the exception of a brief stint as a nominal
Republican in order to vote for Ron Paul in last year's primary. I drifted away
from Libertarian Party activism a long time ago, when party meetings consisted
mostly of spending money for a meeting place, listening to boring reports that
never affected the outside world, and breathing the secondhand smoke of ten Ayn
Rand devotees who considered cigarettes to be an essential political statement. (And the fiasco in 2004 with Arizona having its own government court-appointed
presidential candidate, whose entire platform apparently consisted of
self-indulgent ramblings about matters of great public significance like
"Watergaters" in the national LP office, certainly didn't inspire my return to
the front lines.) I'll at least give you credit for recognizing the importance
of publicity, but it's probably not true that all publicity is good publicity as
long as they spell your name right. There's a difference between a feel-good
stunt and actually promoting one's cause effectively, and I'm not sure that this
difference was well-considered in this case...But that's a separate
Anyway, I used the negative feedback about your event as a
springboard to get in some digs at the KFYI crowd about their disdain for
libertarians; I hope you enjoy my mini-rant...Unfortunately, I've never gotten
any reply from Michele on anything I've ever sent her; I'm not sure that
everything that challenges them doesn't wind up in the delete file, but I have
fun sending copies to people who actually do read their e-mails...
for your principles and your good intentions, even if I don't always agree with
your tactics...Looking forward to your next
|Tags: lyndon, subject, libertarians, michelelarson, clearchannel, michele, making, excellent, observations, variety