Under the name of liberty and freedom, Barack Obama goes down in history as the most reckless and the most dangerous U.S. President ever. He protected the liberty and freedom of Muslim terrorists to kill and destroy us.
What worries me to death is when there are challenges for the infringement of liberty and freedom and those challenges no longer distinguish between the constitutional liberty and freedom of ordinary individual, and the liberty and freedom of terrorists to kill and destroy.
I couldn’t forget the constitutional trauma I experienced when I first listened to Obama’s oratorical defense of the right of the Muslim Community of New York to construct a Mosque in New York City or anywhere in the United States under the Religious Freedom Clause of the Constitution. He was unable to distinguish the ground where the Muslim Mosque was to be constructed from just any ground in the United States. It was a hallowed ground, a sanctified ground … in fact the construction spot was a cemetery of more than three thousand victims who died when Islamic terrorists using hijacked airlines rammed New York’s Twin Towers to the ground on September 11, 2001.
In my more than two decades of lawyering, I have never come across a lawyer’s mind eye, as legally myopic as Obama’s. The fear that what other constitutional wisdom he will miss or will not be able to read in the Constitution when he makes an important life-and-death decision as President of the United States, especially when it involves his favorable treatment of Muslim terrorists, traumatized me.
Let’s start what’s on record. Obama had encouraged and defended the construction of a Muslim Mosque for terrorists and their local anti-Government sympathizers, to honor and celebrate Al Qaeda’s successful 911 attacks of the United States. I repeat … it was right there in the heart of New York, on the very spot where the 911 infamy and the “celebrated” triumph of Islam’s attacks against us, was supposed to be worshiped and forever monumentalized.
I was thankful that due to nationwide condemnation of that attempt to construct a Mosque in the heart of New York City, Obama and his Muslim brethren united as ever under their Islam Faith, were vigorously opposed by the majority of the American people from all walks of life, and this conspicuously bad and offensive project planned by the Muslim community with Obama’s blessing was aborted. To the end, Obama defended with speeches delivered on nationwide radio and television networks this egregious plan to honor forever the victory of Islamic terrorism, and to once more open instead of heal the deep wounds of the survivors and surviving relatives and friends of the 911 infamy in particular, and of the grieving nation in general.
Obama also defended Islamic Jihad in his speech delivered in St. Xavier College at Mumbai, India. He said that Jihad was distorted by violence committed by few extremists. Jihad is something sacred, akin to a holy crusade, to purge the Islam Faith of infidels. He praised Islam as one of the world’s greatest “religion of peace, fairness and tolerance.” This created a furor of severe criticisms, published by Prophesy News Alert on November 09, 2010. In this speech was the blood of thousands of victims of Islam’s treacherous Jihad attacks launched by Al Qaeda against the United States in what is now known in the Western world as the infamous 911 carnage.
Where Obama is extremely dangerous is not that difficult to point out with the highest degree of certainty possible. Obama is the only U.S. President who was reportedly baptized as a disciple of Islam when he was a Muslim school boy in Indonesia – and therefore the only President who had embraced the Faith of Islam. Thus on record he is the only U.S. President in history that bowed down to the Muslim King of Saudi Arabia, his senior in the higher hierarchy of the world’s Islam Faith.
President Obama seemed to have forgotten when in fact he should be the first to know and remember that under our national security laws that he is supposed to implement, the terrorists’ “constitutional” right to liberty and freedom -- to kill and destroy us – are being denied. Violating instead of implementing these national security laws, makes him even a more dangerous President of the United States.
To survive terrorist attacks, this Nation has a standing policy – a standing legacy, if you may -- to fight terror. It has the world’s most effective way to handle threats to national security, which unfortunately radicals and liberal opportunists, crazy Libertarians veering towards the left and their accomplices from the lunatic fringe, including those cavalier coddlers of terrorists’ rights waving the banner of the anti-war movement as they march down the street crying out for blood, do not and cannot understand, refuse to understand, and therefore will NEVER understand.
The Patriot Act, as amended from year-to-year, the strictly enforced TSA screening laws and regulations in the airport, and over a dozen more national security statutes so far passed by Congress, including the latest, the National Defense Authorization Act, have but only this specific purpose in mind: To deprive terrorists of their liberty to kill us, and to deny them of their freedom to destroy us.
With their back against the wall, terrorists and terrorist coddlers are angrily shouting their lungs out in protest against what they claim as violation of their liberty and freedom. This is where the public is misled. It is imperative that this mistaken notion should be clarified: It is not the citizens’ liberty and freedom that are being “violated” but that of terrorists and terrorist suspects.
The National Defense Authorization Act was not passed primarily to pit or set up the Government against just any citizen of the United States in a confrontational way as erroneously portrayed. It was primarily directed against terrorists and terrorist suspects – American citizens or not – to deprive them of due process [security law enforcers have the right to detain them indefinitely pending investigation].
Many well-meaning Americans bumped their head against this faulty notion thereby creating a whiplash of unjustifiable contempt against the Government which hinders the progress of the existing national security programs. Protests can be heard in this corner louder than anywhere else because understandably, this happens to be a Libertarian website of liberty and freedom.
Those laws for national survival against terrorist attacks are constantly and erroneously challenged as infringement of individual liberty and freedom. This is what worries me because those specious challenges no longer distinguish between the constitutional liberty and freedom of ordinary individual, and the liberty and freedom of terrorists to kill and destroy.
This grave insecurity that petrifies me – and I am sure also alarms if not terrifies the rest of all learned but insecure Americans, especially those unsure of what Obama will do next -- will continue for as long as Obama remains the most dangerous President of the United States ever.