Letters to the Editor • Propaganda
Ernest Hancock
Letters to the Editor • Propaganda
Property
rights...
My property
(TV station, Radio station, Newspaper, Billboard) wishes to display (fill in
the blank). You object... then what?
One of the
few legitimate functions of government is to provide unfettered passage between
private properties via "common" routes of travel (not provide the
means of that travel,... or even the common routes). While out among your
neighbors and outside of your 20 foot high walled in and gated community you
should come across an offensive billboard (Las Vegas comes to mind) then you
endure it, move, or be thankful that there isn\'t a central plan that is
deciding what you can and can\'t be exposed to.
Graphic
depictions of illegal acts, real or not (the movie “Hostel” comes to mind –
Europe touring teenagers are kidnapped and tortured to death by paying
customers,… retired CIA I guess) can be very offensive to many. I have a
growing motivation to start some sort of public relations campaign that will
inform me that when I go to see an “R” rated film at the movies, I know if I
should just wear a sensory deprivation helmet during the previews of the next
dozen upcoming feature attractions of blood and guts horror (very annoying to
me). But I don’t have to go to the movies. But I can be very creative in
expressing my concerns while supporting the rights of the theatre owners.
Real
depictions of very bad things concern me. Making it illegal to produce or show
or even own a documentary about military life/torture in Iraq only creates a
Black Market for the material and the torture then gets a new line of revenue
for the profit of very bad things (think about the War on some Drugs).
Possession of the evidence of a crime can’t be a crime in itself or you go down
a very dark path that promotes a black market for such activity.
We often
see Internet video of a group of thugs (High School students, Frat Houses,
Gangs) doing illegal and even very violent things. But the watching of such
video, or the storage on your cell phone isn’t illegal,… yet. What happens when
it is made illegal (which is being attempted to be made a campaign issue
somewhere I’m certain) then immediately a black market is created for such
material and the profit motive to supply even the smallest demand is there to
create more content.
Dr. Mary
Ruwart’s book “Healing our World” and her campaign for Libertarian Presidential
nominee against Bob Barr created controversy for even bringing up these points
in regard to Child Pornography. Since she wished to focus on the damage done to
children she was not in favor of creating a market for their exploitation.
While this
position is rarely understood and even much less a part of polite dinner
conversation, the concept does need to be understood and deeply applied to our
lives to get at the truth of things.
And the
truth is; that the advocacy for not making the possessing of the vilest
material a crime will not currently get you the endorsements of our current
crop of politicians and special interests. But the discussion about
self-censorship and how the Free/Black Markets work is worth the ridicule to
some, for the education of many.
So who
decides what is censored? Individuals decide. They decide for themselves and as
parents. But people grow up and have to begin deciding for themselves and take
responsibility for their own actions. If I wish to burn a warehouse full of
DVDs or deface an offensive billboard or paint over the pictures of aborted
babies on the side of a Pro-life activist’s van, then I have to be willing to
face the consequences of my actions.
Here are
just a few issues to keep this discussion lively.