Freedom's Phoenix Web site
owner and Libertarian activist Ernie Hancock
is
demanding that state Senator Russell Pearce be censured by the Senate
Ethics Committee. This, over an e-mail Pearce sent out recently
suggesting that Hancock's advocacy against Pearce's SB 1070/HB 2632 was
"just short of a domestic terrorist act."
As I've reported
previously, what Hancock did to incur the ire of Pearce was little more
than
send
out a mass e-mail with a link to an article by John Green, one of
FP's many columnists.
In it, Green argued that Pearce's bill --
which greatly expands police powers and makes it a trespassing offense
to be in Arizona and be undocumented -- contained a back door to the
federal Real I.D. Act and a national identification card.
The
Hancock e-mail drew blood, appealing to a handful of Republicans with
concerns about the Pearce legislation. On March 17,
the bill's chief sponsor in the House was forced to "retain" the bill on the calendar, hoping for another chance at a later date..
(Many
have anticipated that the bill would go before the House's Committee of
the Whole again Tuesday, March 23. At present, I see no indication of
the bill being on the House's calendar for Tuesday.)
In any case,
Pearce was steamed, and
dashed
off e-mails calling Hancock "an open-boarders [sic] person."
Apparently,
he was so mad, he couldn't spell.
Hancock said he was going to blow off
the attack, but then
folks started pointing out to him that having a state Senator suggest
you might be up to domestic terrorism could have long term
ramifications.
So
Hancock had attorney Michael Kielsky fire off a letter, accusing
Pearce of attempting to "punish Mr. Hancock and chill the exercise of
his rights to free speech and petition."
Kielsky
asks that the Ethics Committee investigate the matter, and that Pearce
"be admonished and censured, and that he be required to retract his
veiled threats."
That'll teach Pearce to mess with a Libertarian.
Too bad Hancock can't sue.
Meanwhile, according to the
Arizona
Legislative Report,
there's a rump group of seven Republicans who're are saying no to the
Pearce bill, some on the grounds that it's unconstitutional, some for
the as-yet-unknown costs to cities and counties, and at least one for
the concerns over the Real ID Act.
The bill may not be officially
dead till the legislature folds its tent, and calls
sine die.
But the clock is ticking. The budget is done. And legislators want out.
Anyway,
till
sine die, best keep your dukes up, Libertarians and all the
rest.