IPFS News Link • Privacy Rights
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Privacy Rights
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Surveillance
A new wave of wearable devices will collect a mountain on information on us...
News Link •
Privacy Rights
Why Use Virtual Machines for Privacy and Security? Not Obvious! Top 6 List!
News Link •
Hacking, Cyber Security
Millions Of Google, WhatsApp, Facebook 2FA Security Codes Leak Online
News Link •
Privacy Rights
2024 Is the New 1984: Big Brother and the Rise of the Security Industrial Complex
News Link •
Privacy Rights
Energy "Smart" Meters Violate Consumers' Right to Privacy; U.S. "Smart" Mete
News Link •
Internet
4 Comments in Response to Karen Johnson Opposes Privacy Rights?!
Karen Johnson shows once again that being a "social conservative" is not consistent with the 9th Amendment. She is so concerned with "honoring God" that she is apparently willing to ignore individual rights.
________________
Joe Cobb
.
The flaw in this editorial is falling into the trap of treating people as groups rather than as individuals. In doing so, she becomes as publicly offensive as the libertine behavior she decries. It's an Irving Kristol tactic that puts the Republican Party in exactly the pickle they now find themselves.
Based purely on anecdotal evidence, I would guess that she may choose to write this editorial differently today.
This is five years old. Regarding a Senator who is reportedly not running for another office or re-election. Her term is up this year. And it is a few days after the Devvy Kidd column that referred to her on a non-related area. Timeliness. So who cares? What is the merit of posting this article? Not that I care much beyond asking the above questions?
I read the article and think that each of us will take from it our own understanding. But I am glad to have this perspective shared for the examination of the thought process Karen uses and the framing of several issues as they are seen by the many people that support her as a legislator.