IPFS News Link • Internet
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Internet
In his announcement today, McCain appeared to agree with the notion that Net neutrality represents regulation and control, rather than a lack thereof. It "will keep the Internet free from government control and regulation," McCain said.
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Techno Gadgets
Skynet Has Arrived: Google Follows Apple, Activates Worldwide Bluetooth LE Mesh Network
News Link •
Education: Government Schools
Schools Were Just Supposed To Block Porn. Instead They Sabotaged Homework and Censored...
News Link •
Robots and Artificial Intelligence
Google Eyes Paid AI Search Features, Explores Subscription Model; Report
News Link •
Techno Gadgets
RAND Corporation: "Internet Of Bodies May Lead To Internet Of Brains" By 2050
News Link •
Internet
"I'm Done With Google": Wholesale Loss Of Trust After "Unbelievably Irresponsible
News Link •
Voting - Election Integrity
JD Vance Calls For BREAKING UP Google After It's Revealed They're RIGGING 2024 Election
News Link •
Censorship
Elon Musk Hints at Plans for an Unbiased Search Engine, Email Service to Rival Google
News Link •
Technology: Software
X takes on Google: Elon Musk claims he's creating a Gmail rival dubbed 'XMail'
News Link •
Internet
1 Comments in Response to McCain introduces bill to block internet neutrality
I can't believe I'm going to say this, but I agree with McCain. While I don't believe his motivation is pure, he is absolutely correct in not asking the government to protect our freedoms. If a provider doesn't provide the service level we demand, we'll find another provider. We surely don't want to invite the "man" in to monitor our communications any more that they already do, to protect it. Do we?