IPFS News Link • Gun Rights
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Gun Rights
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
Guns in the Home Statistics: The Effects of Firearms in the Home in 2024
News Link •
Robots and Artificial Intelligence
Elon Musk Reveals Two "Very Mentally Ill" People With Guns Tried To Assassinate Him
News Link •
Gun Rights
Armorer on Alec Baldwin Movie 'Rust' Found Guilty of Involuntary Manslaughter
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
44 Magnum Ballistics Tables From All the Major Ammunition Manufacturers
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
Anti-Gun Control Arguments 2024: Facts Gun Control Lobby Suppress
Feature Article •
Gun Rights
300 PRC Ballistics Tables From Every Major Ammo Manufacturer
News Link •
Tyranny
6 Comments in Response to Obama to Seek New Assault Weapons Ban
In 1994, the U.S. Justice Department under Attorney General Janet Reno considered introducing legislation that would allow “summary forfeiture" of unregistered firearms. DOJ allegedly wanted to eliminate the government's high costs of forfeiture proceedings to confiscate weapons. Under the proposed Legislation gun owners would be barred from being able to prove their confiscated weapons were in fact legally registered or did not come under the “technical definition” of a gun that must be registered.
In 1994, DOJ proposed legislation that would include the words “premises containing illegal weapons” written similar to drug forfeiture laws. Some gun owners expressed concern the word “container” in the proposed DOJ legislation might open the door for U.S. Government to civilly forfeit private homes found by law enforcement to “contain” illegal or unregistered guns.” Since most gun owners kept their guns in homes, gun-owners should be alert to proposed or passed “Federal or State forfeiture legalization” that mentions guns or weapons.
Yeah man,...what's with the date on this? I saw this and began cross-posting it on several gun forums before I realized it was a year old. Made me look like a major doofus.
Without Semi-automatic Weapons, How Could Americans Resist Unconstitutional Actions of a Proposed Federal Police Stabilization Force?
A recently disclosed NGO Rand Corporation Report provided the U.S. Army appears to suggest a hybrid military “National Police Stabilization Force.” On its face the Rand report appears directed at protecting national security. But Citizens without semi-automatic weapons would be helpless to defend themselves against a tyrannical federal police rapid deployment Stabilization Force violating their Constitutional Rights. The suggested “National Police Stabilization Force” would appear to be controlled by the Feds and might incorporate in its ranks, local and state police.
In retrospect, Hitler created a “Civilian National Security Force”, the Gestapo the contraction of Geheime Staatspolizei for "Secret State Police." In 1934 the Gestapo was placed under SS leader Heinrich Himmler Chief of German Police. Then in 1939 all German Police agencies were put under the control of the "Reich Main Security Office” the equivalent of U.S. Homeland Security. You might want to read information about the Rand Report to determine if its suggestions mirror aspects of the Nazi consolidation of German local and federal law enforcement, including its Secret Police it put under its “Main Security Office.” The suggested "National Police Stabilization Force" could potentially be sent into any State, against the wishes of its Citizens? States need to have the power to refuse entry to potential Shock Troops. To better clarify the Rand Corporation report visit:
I'm as worried about this as anyone... but this story is from FEBRUARY 2009. Did I miss something?
>>"I think closing the gun show loophole,...
What loopholes?
>>...the banning of cop-killer bullets...
Just what is a cop-killer bullet? And, how many cops have been with them?
>>....and I also think that making the assault weapons ban permanent,...
Possession and sale of assault weapons have been tightly regulated in the U.S. for decades, and private ownership requires a tax stamp from the BATF. And, just how many such assault weapons have been used in crimes here or in Mexico?
Holder knows this but the b.s. continues.
It makes you wonder if these guys are major stockholders in Colt, Kalashnikov, Fabrique Nationale, etc. Nothing these guys do surprises me any more.