IPFS News Link • Military Industrial Complex
IPFS News Link • Military Industrial Complex
“There is a rank due to the United States, among nations,
which will be withheld, if not absolutely lost, by the reputation of
weakness.”
George Washington
It is official. Deputy Secretary of Defense William Lynn says we
cannot afford guns and butter. So what happens? Do we fund the weapons
or the troops who use them? One thing is certain: no one is going to be
happy.
Last week Lynn confirmed what Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
said during a speech at the Eisenhower Library in Abilene, Kansas:
Major cuts are coming. No doubt the library venue was selected because
Gates had to pander to the liberal wing of the Obama administration by
resurrecting Ike’s warnings about a “military industrial complex” and a
“garrison state.” Old slogans never die, especially when money for
defense is involved.
What Lynn said was that the Department of Defense (DoD) would
kill part or all of some weapon buys in order to come up with $100
billion. Since the White House intends to flatline the defense budget
for years, the funds made available by these new “efficiencies” will be
needed just to maintain current force levels. What will get canceled
or reduced? The crosshairs are moving toward the F-35 and F-22
fighters, the Marines’ amphibious Expeditionary Fighting Vehicle,
unspecified hardware and, of course, the troops.
We will not know exactly which weapons go on the chopping block
until Washington finishes horse trading. Lobbyists worry about how
campaign contributions promote their clients’ programs, politicians
worry about factories in their districts, and the White House worries
about looking weak on defense in the coming elections. But that $100
billion “efficiency” money will not solve the toughest DoD problem: the
payroll.
No one in the Obama administration worries much about the troops
and their families. After all, they do not have a union, and the White
House figures they will follow Pentagon orders anyway.