IPFS News Link • Iraq
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday
IPFS News Link • Iraq
Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:
News Link •
Syria
U.S. strikes more than 85 targets in Iraq and Syria in initial barrage of retaliatory attacks
News Link •
WAR: About that War
Boots on the Ground...Jan. 20th...The threat of a wider war is increasing...
Feature Article •
WAR: About that War
20 years ago, George Bush and Tony Blair launched an illegal war in Iraq...
News Link •
WAR: About that War
2 Comments in Response to WMD Transfer Supported by Satellite Images
Yeah, Gene, I gotta mostly agree. Except the Bush/Cheney thing where I would instead say that in fact Bush restrained Cheney about a dozen times at least (on account of they were controlled by different lobbies, to an extent). But yeah, as for the rest of your comments, this article is true in precisely the way that Powell stated to the UN "these here utterly ordinary reefer trucks are mobile biological weapons sites". A total, utter load of hogwash. In this case, the hog is being washed by the Zio-genocide machine. Pork, pork, pork. Gobble, gobble, gobble.
The underlying article exhibits as much hysteria as Michael Shermer and his crowd about Intlligent Design. Six instances of "support" in its various tenses further the "theory" (3 instances) of "suspicious" (3 instances) movements.
I direct eeryone to Shermer's article/video. I haven't watched it, because I read his drivel over a year ago. I'm sure it's filled chock full with "might have"s, "experts believe" (oops, they're not supposed to "believe", are they?), "could have"s, "data infers"'s, ad infinitum.
All of this about "an award winning journalist" (and we know who awards, don't we?), who apparently "said in 2004 that his sources confirmed that Saddam Hussein’s WMDs were in Syria". Apparentl;y "A Pentagon document (conveniently undated) "reveals that an Iraqi dissident reported that 50 trucks crossed the border on March 10, 2003, and that his sources in Syria confirmed they carried WMD."