"Absolute Immunity": The Deadliest Weapon in the Prosecutor's Arsenal

08-07-2014 • by William N. Grigg (Pro Liberate)

"Prosecutors are rewarded for winning at all costs, they have no incentive to seek the truth rather than a conviction, and they are entirely unaccountable when they pervert justice in pursuit of victory," observes Idaho resident John T. Bujak. "People shouldn't believe that their innocence provides any protection. The question isn't whether you have done anything wrong, but whether the criminal justice system is going to target you ? and once you're in that system, you face prohibitive odds of emerging from it without being hurt."....

1 Comments in Response to "Absolute Immunity": The Deadliest Weapon in the Prosecutor's Arsenal

Comment by PureTrust

Entered on: 8/7/2014 8:06:51 AM

http://educationcenter2000.com/Trinsey-v-Paglario.htm

With Regards to Trinsey v. Pagliaro:

"Inasmuch as every government is an artificial person, an abstraction, and a creature of the mind only, a government can interface only with other artificial persons. The imaginary, having neither actuality nor substance, is foreclosed from creating and attaining parity with the tangible. The legal manifestation of this is that no government, as well as any law, agency, aspect, court, etc. can concern itself with anything other than corporate, artificial persons and the contracts between them."

"An attorney for the plaintiff cannot admit evidence into the court. He is either an attorney or a witness".

----------

The point is, you need to do court without using any attorneys to speak for you.

You need to stand in the form of a man or woman, present, not representing yourself = sui juris, not pro se.

You need to state the holdings of Trinsey v Pagliaro into the record.

When you do this, attorneys can't speak without shedding their attorney office. No more immunity.