The Saker is a level-headed person. I take it seriously when he spells out the threat to Trump's presidency presented by the paradoxical alliance of the ruling oligarchs with what purports to be the "liberal/progressive/left." It is amazing that the "liberal/progressive/left" are aligned with war and not with peace and are aligned with the OnePercent against the working class, whom they despise as "Trump deplorables."

The Saker believes that Trump is under serious threat of being overthrown and that he must strike first or go down. http://www.unz.com/tsaker/a-color-revolution-is-under-way-in-the-united-states/

As my readers are highly intelligent, I am not surprised that some of them have arrived at the same conclusion as The Saker. Here is what one had to say:

I am totally astounded by the madness–even at formerly reasonable left-liberal websites. Alternet is one big hysteria factory. Although Counterpunch has had good articles by Mike Whitney, you (I presume, since I read your articles on your website), Diana Johnstone and a few others, I can't believe how they've jumped in, too. I've been reading CP since the beginning of the newsletter in the 90s. Until this year, they were (after yours) my go-to website when I turned the computer on. I can't believe they have a new article titled "Beyond Resistance – Defeating Trump's Burgeoning Dictatorship". And another: "Democracy in Exile and the Curse of Totalitarianism". And another: "Muslim Bans, White Supremacy and Fascism in Our Time". Patrick Cockburn has an article titled: "Trump's Muslim Ban Will Only Spark More Terrorist Attacks". Even the World Socialist Website has gone bananas.

Almost all of the German left-mainstream sites have gone insane. On the one hand, it seems like almost every protest group, in the end, has a source of money from Soros. On the other, it seems like 40% of the population must have been put through an MK-Ultra program. How could such mass hysteria otherwise be produced?

This is the level of argument with which protesters oppose Trump's presidency: http://ijr.com/2017/01/790842-protester-calls-on-crowd-to-start-killing-people-wait-till-you-find-out-what-she-does-for-a-living/?utm_source=email&utm_campaign=morning-newsletter&utm_medium=owned

Readers share my amazement that there are large numbers of people so stupid as to think that a ban on Muslim immigrants is far worse than murdering Muslims in seven countries for fifteen years. Bush and Obama conducted genocide against Muslims over the course of four presidential terms, and no protesters sought their impeachment for what are most certainly war crimes and crimes against humanity. But Trump's perfectly legal immigration action is alleged to be grounds for impeachment!

The protesters are completely nonsensical, so much so that it must be an orchestration. As the protesting websites, if not all of the protesters in the streets, accept the 9/11 storyline and the hoax "war on terror" that the storyline justifies, it follows logically that Muslims, already "terrorists" by definition (just ask the neoconservatives and Israel), fleeing their death and destruction by Washington might harbor thoughts of harm to Americans. Considering the ruling storyline, to let them in would be irresponsible.

But not to the protesters. It wasn't the killing of their families and destruction of their homes and counries that might make Muslims into terrorists. It is banning them from entry as refugees that turns them into terrorists!