Article Image
News Link • Conspiracies

U.S. Citizens and the New World Order

• Sharlene Holt, Musicians for Freedom

Note: You may also be interested in reading Barack Obama Admits All Government is by Consent, also, Do Not Consent: The Path to American Freedom, also Are You in Jail by Your Own Consent? Also, Did You Consent to the Feds Usurping Your Unalienable Rights?

Vengeancia The entity known as the "U.S. Citizen" is a vehicle programmed by the owners of the Federal Corporation dba the U.S. of A, to transfer all wealth, property, and humanity's unalienable rights, to the financial elite. The exact mechanism of this operation is the subject of scholarly research. Americans have become so dumbed down by the lamestream media, its propaganda machine, and the mandatory youth indoctrination centers aka "public" schools, that we no longer have the ability, collectively, to discern the truth of the matter. Each man and woman holds the key, individually, to love and fear; all we have to do to become a free nation once again is to turn it in the lock.

USA vs. US

"The whole Revolution, therefore, as a Revolution, was declared and accomplished by the people, acting separately as individuals, and exercising each his natural rights, and not by their governments in the exercise of their constitutional powers.

"It was, therefore, as individuals, and only as individuals, each acting for himself alone, that they declared that their consent - that is, their individual consent for each one could consent only for himself - was necessary to the creation or perpetuity of any government that they could rightfully be called on to support.

"What scope! What a horizon of work for the next two centuries for the best energies of the best people in the world...The only thing feasible to carry out this idea is a secret society gradually absorbing the wealth of the world, to be devoted to this object." Cecil Rhodes

"In the same way each declared, for himself, that his own will, pleasure, and discretion were the only authorities he had any occasion to consult, In determining whether he would any longer support the government under which be had always lived.

And if this action of each individual were valid and rightful when he had so many other individuals to keep him company, it would have been, in the view of natural justice and right, equally valid and rightful, if he had taken the same step alone.

"He had the same natural right to take up arms alone to defend his own property against a single tax-gatherer, that he had to take up arms in company with three millions of others, to defend the property of all against an army of tax-gatherers.

Sovereignty Education & Defense Ministry

"Thus the whole Revolution turned upon, asserted, and, in theory, established, the right of each and every man, at his discretion, to release himself from the support of the government under which he had lived. And this principle was asserted, not as a right peculiar to themselves, or to that time, or as applicable only to the government then existing; but as a universal right of all men, at all times, and under all circumstances."

--Lysander Spooner

Watch the Video!

This hauntingly beautiful song is called "O Quam Tristis" by Marco Rosano, an italian (Turin) composer living in Belgium. Music Scores by Marco Rosano. He's also currently working on a Requiem.

Graphic sources include the movie, Thrive.

The purpose of establishing government is solely to provide "protection". Those who wish to be protected by a specific government must expressly consent to be protected by choosing a domicile within the civil jurisdiction of that specific government. Here's a great overview of events that have led to where we are today, check out this link.

Generally, those who have made such a choice and thereby become "customers" of the protection afforded by government are called by any of the following names under the civil laws of the jurisdiction they have nominated to protect them:

--"citizens", or "residents" (aliens) if they were born within the country in which the jurisdiction is a part.

--"inhabitants", which encompasses both "citizens", and "residents" but excludes foreigners.

--"persons", or "individuals".

In law, the process of choosing a domicile within the jurisdiction of a specific government is called "animus manendi". More.

That choice makes you a consenting party to the "civil contract", "social compact", and "private law" that attaches to and therefore protects all "inhabitants" and things physically situated on or within that specific territory, venue, and jurisdiction.

At M4F, we believe the solution to America's problems, and the planet's problems, is to restore the balance of power to individual people. Once more people have learned how to be free & to defend and monetize their unalienable rights under the common law, we'll have a better chance to restore a republic of free people without resorting to collectivist political movements that can be easily co-opted.

All people have the right to choose their domicile and politiical jurisdiction All people have the right to choose their domicile and politiical jurisdiction

In the year 1297, the phrase, "Law of the Land," was used in the Magna Carta. Perhaps the most famous clause of Magna Carta states:

"No Freeman shall be taken or imprisoned, or be disseised of his Freehold, or Liberties, or free Customs, or be outlawed, or exiled, or any other wise destroyed; nor will We not pass upon him, nor condemn him, but by lawful judgment of his Peers, or by the Law of the Land."

In a sense then, your consent to a specific jurisdiction by your choice of domicile within that jurisdiction is what creates the "person", "individual", "citizen", "resident", or "inhabitant" which is the only proper subject of the civil laws passed by that government.

A man or woman who has not consented to the jurisdiction of the U.S. (or any other jurisdiction) is called a "people" who is "sovereign." When he or she is forced or coerced into commerce with the U.S. and its Franchises, the one coercing you is in dishonor and must pay for that. That is why you need to honorably give them notice of your Fee Schedule so they will not dishonor themselves. If they do, the schedule gives them a way to reinstate their honor.

Choosing a domicile within a specific jurisdiction causes an implied waiver of sovereign immunity, because the courts admit that the term "person" does not refer to the "sovereign":

"Since in common usage, the term person does not include the sovereign, statutes not employing the phrase are ordinarily construed to exclude it." [United States v. Cooper Corporation, 312 U.S. 600 (1941)]

"Sovereignty itself is, of course, not subject to law for it is the author and source of law;" [Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)]

"There is no such thing as a power of inherent Sovereignty in the government of the United States. In this country sovereignty resides in the People, and Congress can exercise no power which they have not, by their Constitution entrusted to it: All else is withheld." [Juilliard v. Greenman, 110 U.S. 421 (1884)]

Those who have become customers of government protection by choosing a civil domicile within a specific government then owe a duty to pay for the support of the protection they demand. The method of paying for said protection is called "taxes". In earlier times this kind of sponsorship was called "tribute". Both state and federal income taxation is based almost entirely upon what is called "domicile". Domicile is a choice we make that requires our consent and participation, and because it requires our consent, then becoming a "taxpayer" who owes a tax requires our consent.


Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:

Agorist Marketplace