Larken Rose

More About: Philosophy: Political

Giffords: Reality Turned Inside-Out

The ongoing discussion of the shooting of Gabrielle Giffords makes an outstanding example of the utter insanity and profound hypocrisy which the belief in "government" creates. Specifically, nearly all the related discussions about violence have turned reality upside-down, backwards, and inside out. Leftists are having conniption fits about the political ads by Sarah Palin, showing Giffords in "crosshairs," screaming that that counts as advocating violence. There are several ways in which this complaint is completely batty.

1) Leftist constantly advocate violence. "Taxation," as one example, is the forced confiscation of wealth backed by the threat of violence. Those who timidly cooperate with the mere threat never see the violence in their face, but take it from someone who has had his home forcibly invaded by armed IRS agents: "taxation" is backed by men with guns, who are quite willing to use violence to get their way. When all those leftists who support the very system of "taxation" that resulted not only in an armed invasion of my home, but in me being caged for a year, whine about a stupid political ad, the level of hypocrisy makes me want to vomit.

2) Right-wing statists, like Sarah Palin, also constantly advocate violence, in the form of various "laws" and authoritarian actions. Gabrielle Giffords herself was part of the federal war-mongering committee, which constantly advocates a double-dose of violence: violence used to force all Americans, including pacifists, to fund overt violence overseas. Bizarrely, instead of being criticized for that--instead of being taken to task for advocating aggression against hundreds of millions of Americans and the murder of lots of foreigners--Sarah Palin is being attacked for a stupid campaign ad. Holy smokes, people! Could your priorities and perspectives possibly be any more screwed up?!

3) There is a moral difference between aggressive force--initiating violence against someone who hasn't threatened or harmed anyone--and using defensive force. The vast majority of "government" violence, advocated by the "left" and the "right," is unjustified, immoral aggressive force. But again, statists from both sides, being believers in the cult of "government," don't think it counts as violence, because in their eyes, it's not being committed by mere people, but by the mystical, magical, superhuman entity known as "government." And most people imagine that it has the right to do things which mere mortals do not.

Defensive force, even deadly force if necessary, is both moral and justified. And whether it's "legal" or not makes no difference. What this means is that, when the thugs wearing the label of "government" commit aggression, resisting them by any means necessary is absolutely justified. As a practical matter, I would almost always advise against it, because resistors will almost always be caged, and often killed, for daring to resist "legal" aggression. But whether it's a good idea in practical terms (which it usually isn't), and whether it's moral (which it is), are different issues.

The end result is that I'm watching the insane national argument over the Giffords shootings, as one who believes that defensive force--even if "illegal" and even if used against "law enforcers"--is justified. Meanwhile, both groups of people who are constantly advocating the use of aggressive violence are arguing over something that was not an example of advocating violence (political rhetoric and ads). It's just too weird to take.

Gabrielle Giffords herself was directly involved in exerting aggressive violence, overseas and here, against non-violent people, via war-mongering, "taxation," forcibly interfering with the medical industry, and so on. She was not an innocent. She was an advocate of widespread, perpetual, forcible aggression. But being a devout statist, I'm guessing that she truly believed that the violence she was helping to commit didn't count as violence, because it was called "law," and done in the name of "authority." That's a perfect example of what The Most Dangerous Superstition leads to: basically good people do evil things, and don't even notice.

So one set of people who constantly advocate violence (Democrats) are complaining about another set of people who constantly advocate violence (Republicans), based on something that is not the advocacy of violence (the political ads). It's like one gang of thieves criticizing another gang of thieves for committing a crime they didn't actually commit. How weird can it get? Statists, "left" and "right," advocate constant, wide-spread violence against millions of people, but they genuinely imagine, having been indoctrinated into state-worship, that it doesn't count as violence because it is being done by the deity called "government," which they imagine to be exempt from human morality.

As if that wasn't looney enough, there has also been the predictable clamor of people who say that the Gifford shooting proves that we need more "gun control." The belief in "authority" allows otherwise rational people to openly declare that they abhor violence, while saying they want guns "outlawed." They fail to notice the glaring contradiction therein.

Every "law" ("gun control" or otherwise) is not a suggestion, or a request, but a threat of violence, which will be enforced by men with guns. Putting it in question form makes "gun control" advocates squirm: If I keep a firearm even when it's "illegal" to do so (and I would), so that I can protect my family from aggressors, what do you "gun control" proponents advocate be done to me if I get caught? Do you advocate that someone give me a stern talking to? Do you advocate that people ask me nicely to disarm myself? Or do you advocate that I be forcibly captured and put in a cage? And if I resist that--which I would--do you advocate that I be killed? If you don't mind, please don't advocate that I be murdered, while claiming that you abhor violence. And don't advocate someone shooting me, while saying you hate gun violence. Doing so is both immoral and insane.

 "Gun control" is violence enforced with guns. In other words, so-called "gun control" is gun violence. Ask a Branch Davidian about this, if you can find one who the feds haven't murdered yet. Or ask Randy Weaver. Ask him how compassionate and peace-loving "gun control" is. If you don't know what I'm talking about, turn off your statist-controlled TV long enough to do an internet search, and see "gun control" in action.

To be blunt, the opinions of the average American regarding morality, violence and justice are warped and twisted to the point of being about as backward as they could possibly be. The good news is that this is not the result of individual stupidity or malice. It is the result of life-long indoctrination into the cult of "government." If you love humanity, and consider yourself peace-loving, I dare you to read "The Most Dangerous Superstition." You may find that your good intentions and noble virtues are being used against you, to the extreme detriment of humanity. You may find that all the pain and suffering that you see in the world, all the injustice you want to end, is feeding off of you. If that were the case, would you want to know? Or would you rather cling to whatever you already believe, regardless of the harm it may be doing to others? Again, I dare you to read the book

2 Comments in Response to

Comment by Henry Dickinson
Entered on:



Subject: Amazing!       


Jesus Throughout the Entire Bible by an 11 Year-Old




Recommended video:




Proverbs 22:6  ¶Train up a child in the way he should go: and when he is old, he will not depart from it.


John 14:6  Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me.
Matthew 7:13  Enter ye in at the strait gate: for wide is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth to destruction, and many there be which go in thereat:




Ecclesiastes 7:13  Consider the work of God: for who can make that straight, which he hath made crooked?


John 1:12  But as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of God, even to them that believe on his name. Heb. 4:12 For the word of God is quick, and powerful, James 1:21  Wherefore lay apart all filthiness and superfluity of naughtiness, and receive with meekness the engrafted word, which is able to save your souls.

Philippians 2:15  That ye may be blameless and harmless, the sons of God, without rebuke, in the midst of a crooked and perverse nation, among whom ye shine as lights in the world;




2 Corinthians 4:6  For God, who commanded the light to shine out of darkness, hath shined in our hearts, to give the light of the knowledge of the glory of God in the face of Jesus Christ.


Acts 26:18  To open their eyes, and to turn them from darkness to light, and from the power of Satan unto God, that they may receive forgiveness of sins, and inheritance among them which are sanctified by faith that is in me.


Will you receive the Lord Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins? Romans 10:13  For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.


Notice how all words in the King James Bible match up with all other words to lead to the Word, the Lord Jesus Christ, who is the Word and he is God. John 1:1  ¶In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. Psalms 138:2  I will worship toward thy holy temple, and praise thy name for thy lovingkindness and for thy truth: for thou hast magnified thy word above all thy name.




The word when written with a small (w) is always talking about the scripture and the scripture that it is talking about is always the King James Bible and when the word, the scripture, is written with a small (w) it often has a (s) on it because the scriptures are made up of many words. When these words point to God, with the capital Word, you never see the (s) on the end of it because there is only one God, or one of him. Psalms 12:6  The words of the LORD are pure words: as silver tried in a furnace of earth, purified seven times.
7  Thou shalt keep them, O LORD, thou shalt preserve them from this generation for ever. Proverbs 30:5  Every word of God is pure: he is a shield unto them that put their trust in him.
6  Add thou not unto his words, lest he reprove thee, and thou be found a liar.




Notice that he, God, and his words are the same just as you and your words are the same. If I change the wording, it's no longer what God said or if you change what I said, it's no longer what I said but what you said that I said, it has become different and things different are not equal or the same. Since God is perfect and cannot lie, he commands us to be perfect and to put away lying Eph. 4:25, Ja. 3:2. If he says he would preserve his word to every generation, and he has, with many infallible proofs, in which it has proven to be the King James Bible, why would you not believe it and take him at his word?


As soon as you change it, you not only make him a liar but you break his commandments in doing so making you an unbeliever in his word which is the truth, and if you don’t have the truth how can you be saved? See Isaiah 8:20  To the law and to the testimony: if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them. Matthew 7:15  ¶Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 1 Peter 4:11 If any man speak…..


 That's why he said not to change the words because he has preserved them in simple six grade English so that this generation, who is being dumbed down by the educational system, will not have any excuse, at the judgment, for not believing it, or understanding it or receiving it. (it) see Gen 3:15. 




Romans 10:13  For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
1 John 3:6  Whosoever abideth in him sinneth not: whosoever sinneth hath not seen him, neither known him.
Romans 10:12  ¶For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek: for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him.
Acts 4:12  Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved.
Matthew 1:21  And she shall bring forth a son, and thou shalt call his name JESUS: for he shall save his people from their sins.


Acts 16:31  And they said, Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ, and thou shalt be saved, and thy house.




It is the Christ of the King James Bible the Authorized Version that will save you not the Christ’s of the perverted corrupted versions that come from corrupt manuscripts, like the ENGLISH REVISED VERSION






All of them claim to be an improvement over the King James Bible. Maybe the one they come out with next year 2012 will finally be the word of God and then the right Christ can finally save us. Matthew 24:5  For many shall come in my name, saying, I am Christ; and shall deceive many.


Every new version has a different Christ, like the Mormon’s; they have a different Christ than the Jehovah Witnesses. They didn’t exist until 1820 so you know they can’t be right or have the truth. Why would all you preachers think any version written after that date would be any more right than they are? 




The God that made this world and is going to judge this world by his word isn’t going to let it be corrupted and says so in 1 Peter 1:23  Being born again, not of corruptible seed, but of incorruptible, by the word of God, which liveth and abideth for ever.




It’s a very serious thing. Why would you trust your eternal soul to corrupt versions that were inspired by Satan when the word of God tells you he is not the author of all this confusion? 1Cor. 14:33.




If the wisdom of this world from the god of this world and all of his Christ’s and counterfeit versions and counterfeit conversions will come to nought, where does that leave you who are preaching these false gospels in which the King James Bible says are accursed? Gal. 1:8




In Noah’s day there wasn’t but one ark and we had better get on the right ark of the King James Bible and have enough sense to come in out of the rain. When you imply that the Bible is the Words of God, capital W with the s on the end of it, rather then the words of God, you are implying that there is more than one,


Selah. Matthew 24:37  But as the days of Noe were, so shall also the coming of the Son of man be.


There was only one ark of safety in Noah’s day and there is only one Bible that will keep you safe in our day. Lk. 11:28 with Rev. 3:10.




The minute articulation is most importance as in Galatians 3:16  Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ. God gives us the example of not changing one letter of one word in this important verse that would imply there is more than one Christ that can save us, not so, Selah.




Facebook: Keep your face in, “The book” the right book and you’ll do and be all right. These are the first two words in the New Testament. See what the last two words are in the last commandment in Rev. 22:19.




For additional information email me at for my tracts On “Iniquity” One of the main themes of the Bible, or my tract on “Treasure in Heaven” or my tract on “Spiritual Puke” Rev. 3:16, or my tract on “How the King James Bible will interrupt itself” Isa. 28:10, or my tract on “God Said






It's the King James Bible vs the world Isa. 8:20


It's the wisdom from above vs the wisdom of this world. Ja. 3:16 234 times in 222 verses


It's the word of God vs the god of this world. 2 Cor. 4:3-4 697 times in 673 verses


It's the light vs darkness. Acts 26:18 272 times in 235 verses


It's truth vs error. 1 Jn. 4:6 235 times in 222 verses


It's the spirit of truth vs the spirit of error. 1Jn. 4:6 235 times in 222 verses


It's being saved vs being lost. The whole Bible. 110 times in 104 verses


It's being of God the Father vs of your father the devil. Jn. 8:44 979 times in 852 verses


It's having the knowledge of God vs the knowledge of this world. Pro. 3:5-6 172 times in 169 verses


It's having the understanding of God vs the understanding of this world. Pro. 4:7 160 times in 156 verses


It's having eternal life vs life that is terminal. Rom. 6:23 47 times in 47 verses


It's going to Heaven vs going to hell. Lk. 16:19 582 times in 550 verses


It's being bless vs being cursed. Lk. 11:28 127 times in 117 verses


It's being a live vs being death. 1 Cor 15:22  247 times in 231 verses


It's speaking truth vs speaking a lie. Eph. 4:25 62 times in62 verses, speak 513 in 484 verses


It's joy vs sorrow. 1 Pet. 1:8 Used 165 times in 155 verses




It goes on and on. If you looked up each one of these words in each one of these verses and how they reference to one another, you would have just scratched the surface before your time on this earth would run out, such is the depth of the King James Bible. That’s why Satan keeps changing it. That was the first sin of the universe called “Iniquity” in Ezek. 28, changing what God said, he corrupted his wisdom and it damned his soul to hell and a Lake of Fire forever. That’s why he wants you to change it because misery loves company see Ezek. 32: 20-32. He is comforted over all his multitude that he caused to be slain by the sword. The sword in our day is the King James Bible.


I hope you don’t stay in that multitude. Few there be that find it. Follow every word. Mt. 4:4











































Comment by Kevin Mccauley
Entered on:

YEs Of course the allmighty Government is always right.

I was recenlty walking down my street in the middle of the afternoo.

I was approached by 2 Policemen in theri cars.

They stopped and said Hey where you coming from

 I said nowhere I am going home.

Teh said we want to talk to you.

I asked ,what do you want to talk about?

 They said nothing we just want to talk.

I said well if there is nothing in particular you want I will be one my way.

Then one of them grabbed me by the arm.

I sasked him again What do you want? Is there a crime? am I a suspect?

Once again he said no we just want to talk.

I told him again to let me go I am going home.

He refused to let me go and tried to wrestle my arm around my back.

Then the other Policeman grabbed my other arm and the stuggle was on.

I tried to get away.

They tried to cuff me. when they became aware that they were not able to overcome me one Policeman took out  his tazer and tazed me 3 times till I fell limp to the ground.

They handcuffed me and put me in the car.

At the station they did everything they could to get me to cop to some crime.

 they charged me with assault resisting arrest, obstruction disrderly conduct and trespassing.

All BS charges.

I spent a night in jail and now am out on 7500 bucks bail.

 I got 5 grand for a lawyer on retainer to fight this guys.

Now tell me who is violent.



Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: