With the growing Muslim threat throughout the United States and world,
it’s time for rational Western countries to enact an all-out ban on Muslim
immigration. It’s proved disastrous in all of Europe where Muslims
migrated. Why? Muslims do not assimilate or acculturate into
host countries. Rather, they become antagonistic, regressive and violent.
In a new piece by K.C. McAlpin, president of U.S. Inc., “A reply to
critics of The Social Contract's call for a ban on Muslim Immigration to the
U.S.”, he gives full measure why Muslim immigration must be stopped within the
, February 2, 2011.
observers have criticized our fall, 2010
of The Social Contract for its call for a ban on Muslim immigration to the
U.S., on national security grounds,” said McAlpin. “By "thoughtful observers"
we mean to exclude our adversaries on the far left who get a case of the vapors
whenever limits on mass immigration are proposed. Rather this commentary is to
respond to concerns expressed by those on the political left and right who generally
agree with us on the need for common sense immigration reform, and whose minds
are open to rational argument and debate.
to our call for a moratorium on Muslim immigration generally resolve into one
of two arguments: (1) That a ban would violate our Constitutional guarantee of
freedom of religion, or at the least conflicts with the spirit of it; and (2)
That a ban would be impossible to implement and consequently would be nothing
more than a symbolic gesture that antagonizes Muslims and does nothing to
enhance our national security.
the first objection it needs to be understood that applicants for admission to
the United States do not enjoy the protection of the US Constitution or its 1st
Amendment until and unless they are lawfully admitted. The Supreme Court has
ruled that Congress has plenary power under the Constitution to regulate
immigration and determine who can and who cannot be admitted.
may bar immigration on any grounds it chooses - including those classes of persons
protected by our civil rights laws e.g. race, religion, national origin, sex,
age, etc. Congress has used that power in the past to ban the immigration of
Communist Party and National Socialist (Nazi) party members who were deemed to
be threats to our national security. This case is no different.
contend that it is not "religious bigotry" to defend oneself, or
one's family and community from people who profess a particular religion, and
whose adherents have repeatedly tried to attack and murder you in the name of
their God. A ban on the immigration of the entire class of such people is a
rational self-defense measure when it is impossible to distinguish between
those members of the group who pose a threat, and those who do not, and when
protecting innocent lives has the overriding priority it should have for those
charged with defending the nation's citizens from attack. We do not advocate
abridging the freedom of religion of anyone lawfully admitted to the U.S.
second objection assumes that it is impossible to screen Muslims from the pool
of immigration applicants, and therefore useless to try. The idea is that
Muslims would simply identify themselves as members of other faiths or as
non-believers on immigration applications, making such a ban merely symbolic
and unenforceable in practice.
disagree. In the first instance there are a large number of Muslim clerics,
academics, intellectuals, writers and religious leaders who cannot escape their
religious affiliation because it is a matter of public record. In fact a
disproportionate number of such people are among the most anti-American of all
Muslims, and therefore potential threats to our national security.
a ban on Muslim immigration would give the FBI and our national security agencies
a useful weapon to use against those the agencies suspect of being terrorists.
There is a precedent. The aforementioned ban against the immigration of
Communists and Nazis was used in much the same way against those who were
suspected of being Communist or Nazi sympathizers. In addition to preemptive
screening, terrorist suspects who managed to immigrate and were later caught
attending a Mosque could have their visas revoked for falsifying their
immigration applications, and be deported before they became a threat.
such a ban should prevent the resettlement of Muslim refugees within the U.S.
This is important because a troubling number of first and second generation
Muslim refugees who have been given refuge in the U.S. have later turned up in
terrorist training camps in countries such as Somalia and Pakistan. Several
dozen young Somali refugees, for example including U.S. high school graduates,
were found to have returned to Somalia to pursue jihad against the U.S.
imposing a ban on Muslim immigration is very likely to have an impact that goes
far beyond mere symbolism. It is certain to discourage many Muslims from
applying even if they are inclined to falsify their applications. And even
though a ban is certain to exacerbate tensions with the Islamic world, it could
well be the catalyst that triggers the Reformation within Islam that many
observers think is essential if there is ever to be peaceful coexistence
between Islam and the West.
ban on Muslim immigration, therefore, is not only constitutional, but a
practical and necessary way to defend ourselves against the growing threat of
homegrown terrorism the U.S. faces in the 21st Century.”
In a five minute astoundingly simple yet brilliant video, “Immigration, Poverty, and Gum Balls”,
Roy Beck, director of www.numbersusa.ORG,
graphically illustrates the impact of overpopulation. Take five minutes
to see for yourself:
“Immigration by the numbers—off the chart” by Roy Beck
This 10 minute demonstration shows Americans the results of
unending mass immigration on the quality of life and sustainability for future
generations: in a word “Mind boggling!” www.NumbersUSA.org
This is the best website to start: www.numbersusa.org ; watch Roy Beck’s
“Immigration by the Numbers” at 14 minutes. Bi-partisan and very effective.
Become a faxer of pre-written letters to your reps to make positive
for the best information on what we face as a civilization as to overpopulation,
energy, immigration and much more.
; in Australia www.population.org.au
in Great Britain www.optimumpopulation.org
; and dozens of other sites accessed at www.frostywooldridge.com. In Florida, www.flimen.org
Must see DVD: "Blind Spot" www.snagfilms.com/films/title/blind_spot/
, This movie illustrates America's future without oil, water and other
resources to keep this civilization functioning. It's a brilliant educational
Must see: Rapid Population Decline, seven minute video by
Dr. Jack Alpert-
Must see and funny: www.growthbusters.org
Dave Gardner's Polar Bear in Bedroom:
; Dave Gardner, President, Citizen-Powered Media ; Producing the Documentary, GROWTH
BUSTERS; presents Hooked on Growth: Our Misguided Quest for
Prosperity, Join the cause at www.growthbusters.org ;760 Wycliffe
Drive, Colorado Springs, CO 80906 USA; +1 719-576-5565
Check out this link with Wooldridge on bicycle and Lester
Brown and panel discussion:
Tomorrow's Americaproject on www.youtube.com/contemporarylearning.
Producer: GEORGE A. COLBURNwww.tomorrowsamerica.com
Link to www.tomorrowsamerica.com
for more discussions on America's predicament.
FOR MORE INFORMATION:
Frosty Wooldridge has bicycled across six continents - from
the Arctic to the South Pole - as well as six times across the USA, coast to
coast and border to border. In 2005, he bicycled from the Arctic Circle, Norway
to Athens, Greece. He presents "The Coming Population Crisis in America:
and what you can do about it" to civic clubs, church groups, high schools
and colleges. He works to bring about sensible world population balance at www.frostywooldridge.com
He is the author of: America on the Brink: The Next Added 100 Million
Americans. Copies available: 1 888 280 7715