Article Image

21 States Claiming Sovereignty

Written by Subject: Police State
21 States Claiming Sovereignty: AZ, AL, AK, AR, CA, CO, GA, HI, ID, IN, KS, ME, MI, MO, MT, NH, NV, OK, PA, TX, & WA
Wow… it will be interesting to see how this turns out… it’s about time people started stepping up and speaking out.  As people have pointed out in comments, all of these (except for HI) are explicit restatements of what has always been in place, but not necessarily enforced, as detailed by the 10th Amendment.  HI is actually aiming for total sovereignty as it is claimed that HI was never really a state of the U.S. to begin with.  However, I believe the intent of these bills is to let the federal government know that the states’ sovereignty will not be overwritten… say in case certain gun ban laws get passed… or other “War Time / Martial Law” type plans come into play.  Check them out:
AZ: http://www.azleg.gov/FormatDocument.asp?inDoc=/legtext/49leg/1r/bills/hcr2024p.htm
AL: (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
AK:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
AR:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
CA: http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/93-94/bill/sen/sb_0001-0050/sjr_44_bill_940829_chaptered
CO:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
GA: http://www.legis.state.ga.us/legis/1995_96/leg/fulltext/sr308.htm
HI: http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/07-1372.htm
ID:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
IN:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
KS:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
ME:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
MI: http://www.legislature.mi.gov/(S(21rmjiv1sl0wvw55yxurwl55))/documents/2009-2010/Journal/House/pdf/2009-HJ-01-22-002.pdf
MO: http://www.house.mo.gov/content.aspx?info=/bills091/bills/HR212.HTM
MT: http://data.opi.mt.gov/bills/2009/billhtml/HB0246.htm
NH: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/legislation/2009/HCR0006.html
NV:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
OK: http://www.ok-safe.com/files/documents/1/HJR1089_int.pdf
PA:  (Still searching for link - not officially posted, but analysts expect it is in the works)
TX: (not officially declared recently, but is supposedly sovereign since it was never willfully ceded to the States - put on planning list)
WA: http://apps.leg.wa.gov/billinfo/summary.aspx?year=2009&bill=4009
us_states_claim_sov_0055
 
 

3 Comments in Response to

Comment by Michael Bahus
Entered on:

AFTER I READ THIS ARTICLE. I MADE AN INTERESTING OBSERVATION. IT IS NOTED IN YOUR ARTICLE THAT HAWAII, THE BIRTHPLACE OF PRESIDENT OBAMA, NEVER REALLY WAS A STATE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. SINCE PRESIDENT OBAMA CLAIMS HAWAII AS HIS BIRTH STATE THEN THIS MEANS THAT HE MUST RESIGN FROM THE PRESIDENCY OR BE IMPEACHED, BECAUSE REGARDLESS OF ALL THAT HAS BEEN CLAIMED IN THE PAST ABOUT HIM NOT BEING A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES, IF HAWAII IS NOT A STATE OF THE US, THEN IN ACTUALLY HE IS NOT ELIGIBLE TO BE THE PRESIDENT OF THESE UNITED STATES AND MUST BE REMOVED IMMEDIATELY.

Comment by Kathy Mitchell
Entered on:

Also, Arizona is the only state so far, I believe, to include a strong statement about the military being used without the permission of the Governor...a great step in the right direction!

Comment by Richard Stone
Entered on:

This is great ! 21 down and 29 to go !


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:

Purse.IO Save on All Amazon Purchases