Article Image

Mortgage Revocation Seminar

Written by Subject: Federal Reserve
 
NOVEMBER 27-28, 2009, 10 AM TO 5:00 PM
 
Where:
Freedoms Phoenix Workshop
750 W Amelia Ave (Major Crossroads: 7th Ave and Indian School)
Phoenix, AZ 85013
(623) 252-9CAM (CameraFRAUD Even

2-DAY MORTGAGE WORKSHOP: HOW TO STOP FORECLOSURES!

Mickey Palotea of Harrisburg, Pennsylvania is once again coming to Phoenix on November 28 and 29, 2009 for a 2-Day Workshop: How to Stop Foreclosures! This will be the formal start of our group. If you want to save your home(s) you will need to be there. ALL are welcome. We will go over the process, laws, rules and documents for court.
 
The Harrisburg, Pennsylvania group has had 150+ wins and only 4 losses so far. We know what caused the losses and it will not be repeated. People have beaten the banks and we are developing a boiler plate document to kick the banks butt in State or Federal court. We would like to file the documents within a couple of weeks after that.
 
ALL mortgages are illegal, ab initio, and you owe the bank nothing. They never lent you money, it was a scam from the beginning. Our goal is to get at least 200 people to go down to the court at one time in Phoenix and file the documents to stop the banks. It does not matter if you already lost the house to foreclosure, if they are currently foreclosing, if you are not even close to losing the house, or even if it was an investment home. We would like to file the documents within a couple of weeks after this workshop.
 
There is no charge, no fees, etc. It’s all free. Everyone is donating their time and resources to help people keep their homes and squash the banks before they squash us.
 
You can pass this information around. If interested, you will need to attend a meeting and learn about what is going on and start doing paperwork very soon.
 
We are here to help you and to stop the banks. We are not here to make a profit from you. We all work together and no one charges or pays anyone. You will fill in your own documents and go down and file them yourself. Everyone shares all the information and helps each other. If you are not willing to help and are only in it for yourself, we don't need you. But, if you want to save your home and maybe your country, and don't want to pay an attorney, and are willing to do the work and help others, this is where you need to be. We are winning, and you will probably get to keep your home and never make another payment. You may even be able to get back homes lost, or compensation for such.
 
Notes:
It looks like a lot of people are coming. Lunch break will be between 1:15 and 1:45 p.m. There are a 7-11 and a Taco Bell across the street, but I advise bringing your own drinks and munchies. If you have folding or collapsible chairs, I would bring at least one for yourself, or prepare to stand.
 
Again, there is no charge. However we do have costs we will be accepting donations for the generous use of the meeting space.  This way they can keep its doors open and water the tree of liberty.
 
The workshop will be video taped and anyone who brings blank DVDs can have copies made right then and there, at least for yourself and a few others.
 
Be sure to bring a pen and paper!
 

STUDY GUIDE FOR WORKSHOP:

 

It would be helpful for you to study and understand the following prior to the workshop:

 

1)         Do not ask for the "original Note;" ask for the "Genuine and Original Promissory Note."

            Original is not defined in the U.C.C.:

            U.C.C. 1-201 (19) "Genuine" means free of forgery or counterfeiting.

 

2)         Confessed judgment clause in Arizona can be unlawful. See A.R.S § 44-143.  Formal           requirements for and limitations upon confession of judgment under power of             attorney.  Judgment by confession shall not be entered upon a note, bond or other     instrument in writing for the payment of money under the authority of a power of attorney       to confess judgment thereon, unless such authority is executed and acknowledged on a day             subsequent to the date on which the indebtedness to be confessed became due and payable.

 

COGNITIVE NOTE

NO WARNING CLAUSE OF LOST RIGHTS

 

Rule 801. Definitions

The following definitions apply under this article:

 

(a) Statement.

A "statement" is (1) an oral or written assertion or (2) nonverbal conduct of a person, if it is intended by the person as an assertion.

 

(b) Declarant.

A "declarant" is a person who makes a statement.

 

(c) Hearsay.

"Hearsay" is a statement, other than one made by the declarant while testifying at the trial or hearing, offered in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

 

(d) Statements which are not hearsay.

A statement is not hearsay if--

(1) Prior statement by witness. The declarant testifies at the trial or hearing and is subject to cross-examination concerning the statement, and the statement is (A) inconsistent with the declarant's testimony, and was given under oath subject to the penalty of perjury at a trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or in a deposition, or (B) consistent with the declarant's testimony and is offered to rebut an express or implied charge against the declarant of recent fabrication or improper influence or motive, or (C) one of identification of a person made after perceiving the person; or

(2)Admission by party-opponent. The statement is offered against a party and is

(A) the party's own statement, in either an individual or a representative capacity or

(B) a statement of which the party has manifested an adoption or belief in its truth, or

(C) a statement by a person authorized by the party to make a statement concerning the subject, or

(D) a statement by the party's agent or servant concerning a matter within the scope of the agency or employment, made during the existence of the relationship, or

(E) a statement by a coconspirator of a party during the course and in furtherance of the conspiracy.

The contents of the statement shall be considered but are not alone sufficient to establish the declarant's authority under subdivision (C), the agency or employment relationship and scope thereof under subdivision (D), or the existence of the conspiracy and the participation therein of the declarant and the party against whom the statement is offered under subdivision (E).

 

Rule 802. Hearsay Rule

Hearsay is not admissible except as provided by these rules or by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority or by Act of Congress.

 

Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial

(6) Records of regularly conducted activity.  A memorandum, report, record, or data compilation, in any form, of acts, events, conditions, opinions, or diagnoses, made at or near the time by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge, if kept in the course of a regularly conducted business activity, and if it was the regular practice of that business activity to make the memorandum, report, record or data compilation, all as shown by the testimony of the custodian or other qualified witness, or by certification that complies with Rule 902(11), Rule 902(12), or a statute permitting certification, unless the source of information or the method or circumstances of preparation indicate lack of trustworthiness. The term "business" as used in this paragraph includes business, institution, association, profession, occupation, and calling of every kind, whether or not conducted for profit.

 

ARTICLE IX. AUTHENTICATION AND IDENTIFICATION

 

Rule 901. Requirement of Authentication or Identification

 

(a) General provision.

The requirement of authentication or identification as a condition precedent to admissibility is satisfied by evidence sufficient to support a finding that the matter in question is what its proponent claims.

 

(b) Illustrations.

By way of illustration only, and not by way of limitation, the following are examples of authentication or identification conforming with the requirements of this rule:

(1) Testimony of witness with knowledge. Testimony that a matter is what it is claimed to be.

(2) Nonexpert opinion on handwriting. Nonexpert opinion as to the genuineness of handwriting, based upon familiarity not acquired for purposes of the litigation.

(3) Comparison by trier or expert witness. Comparison by the trier of fact or by expert witnesses with specimens which have been authenticated.

(4) Distinctive characteristics and the like. Appearance, contents, substance, internal patterns, or other distinctive characteristics, taken in conjunction with circumstances.

(5) Voice identification. Identification of a voice, whether heard firsthand or through mechanical or electronic transmission or recording, by opinion based upon hearing the voice at any time under circumstances connecting it with the alleged speaker.

(6) Telephone conversations. Telephone conversations, by evidence that a call was made to the number assigned at the time by the telephone company to a particular person or business, if (A) in the case of a person, circumstances, including self-identification, show the person answering to be the one called, or (B) in the case of a business, the call was made to a place of business and the conversation related to business reasonably transacted over the telephone.

(7) Public records or reports. Evidence that a writing authorized by law to be recorded or filed and in fact recorded or filed in a public office, or a purported public record, report, statement, or data compilation, in any form, is from the public office where items of this nature are kept.

(8) Ancient documents or data compilation. Evidence that a document or data compilation, in any form, (A) is in such condition as to create no suspicion concerning its authenticity, (B) was in a place where it, if authentic, would likely be, and (C) has been in existence 20 years or more at the time it is offered.

(9) Process or system. Evidence describing a process or system used to produce a result and showing that the process or system produces an accurate result.

(10) Methods provided by statute or rule. Any method of authentication or identification provided by Act of Congress or by other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority.

 

Rule 902. Self-authentication

Extrinsic evidence of authenticity as a condition precedent to admissibility is not required with respect to the following:

 

(1) Domestic public documents under seal. A document bearing a seal purporting to be that of the United States, or of any State, district, Commonwealth, territory, or insular possession thereof, or the Panama Canal Zone, or the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands, or of a political subdivision, department, officer, or agency thereof, and a signature purporting to be an attestation or execution.

 

(2) Domestic public documents not under seal. A document purporting to bear the signature in the official capacity of an officer or employee of any entity included in paragraph (1) hereof, having no seal, if a public officer having a seal and having official duties in the district or political subdivision of the officer or employee certifies under seal that the signer has the official capacity and that the signature is genuine.

 

(3) Foreign public documents. A document purporting to be executed or attested in an official capacity by a person authorized by the laws of a foreign country to make the execution or attestation, and accompanied by a final certification as to the genuineness of the signature and official position (A) of the executing or attesting person, or (B) of any foreign official whose certificate of genuineness of signature and official position relates to the execution or attestation or is in a chain of certificates of genuineness of signature and official position relating to the execution or attestation. A final certification may be made by a secretary of an embassy or legation, consul general, consul, vice consul, or consular agent of the United States, or a diplomatic or consular official of the foreign country assigned or accredited to the United States. If reasonable opportunity has been given to all parties to investigate the authenticity and accuracy of official documents, the court may, for good cause shown, order that they be treated as presumptively authentic without final certification or permit them to be evidenced by an attested summary with or without final certification.

(4) Certified copies of public records. A copy of an official record or report or entry therein, or of a document authorized by law to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed in a public office, including data compilations in any form, certified as correct by the custodian or other person authorized to make the certification, by certificate complying with paragraph (1), (2), or (3) of this rule or complying with any Act of Congress or rule prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority.

 

(5) Official publications. Books, pamphlets, or other publications purporting to be issued by public authority.

 

(6) Newspapers and periodicals. Printed materials purporting to be newspapers or periodicals.

 

(7) Trade inscriptions and the like. Inscriptions, signs, tags, or labels purporting to have been affixed in the course of business and indicating ownership, control, or origin.

 

(8) Acknowledged documents. Documents accompanied by a certificate of acknowledgment executed in the manner provided by law by a notary public or other officer authorized by law to take acknowledgments.

 

(9) Commercial paper and related documents. Commercial paper, signatures thereon, and documents relating thereto to the extent provided by general commercial law.

 

(10) Presumptions under Acts of Congress. Any signature, document, or other matter declared by Act of Congress to be presumptively or prima facie genuine or authentic.

 

(11) Certified domestic records of regularly conducted activity.  The original or a duplicate of a domestic record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Rule 803(6) if accompanied by a written declaration of its custodian  or other qualified person, in a manner complying with any Act of Congress or rule prescribed by the Supreme Court pursuant to statutory authority, certifying that the record:

(A) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters;

(B) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and

(C) was made by the regularly conducted activity as a regular practice.

A party intending to offer a record into evidence under this paragraph must provide written notice of that intention to all adverse parties, and must make the record and declaration available for inspection sufficiently in advance of their offer into evidence to provide an adverse party with a fair opportunity to challenge them.

 

(12) Certified foreign records of regularly conducted activity.  In a civil case, the original or a duplicate of a foreign record of regularly conducted activity that would be admissible under Rule 803(6) if accompanied by a written declaration by its custodian  or other qualified person certifying that the record:

(A) was made at or near the time of the occurrence of the matters set forth by, or from information transmitted by, a person with knowledge of those matters;

(B) was kept in the course of the regularly conducted activity; and

(C) was made by the regularly conducted activity as a regular practice.

The declaration must be signed in a  manner that, if falsely made, would subject the maker to criminal penalty under the laws of the country where the declaration is signed. A party intending to offer a record into evidence under this paragraph must provide written notice of that intention to all adverse parties, and must make the record and declaration available for inspection sufficiently in advance of their offer into evidence to provide an adverse party with a fair opportunity to challenge them.

 

Rule 903. Subscribing Witness' Testimony Unnecessary

The testimony of a subscribing witness is not necessary to authenticate a writing unless required by the laws of the jurisdiction whose laws govern the validity of the writing.

 

ARTICLE X. CONTENTS OF WRITINGS, RECORDINGS, AND PHOTOGRAPHS

 

Rule 1001. Definitions

For purposes of this article the following definitions are applicable:

(1) Writings and recordings. "Writings" and "recordings" consist of letters, words, or numbers, or their equivalent, set down by handwriting, typewriting, printing, photostating, photographing, magnetic impulse, mechanical or electronic recording, or other form of data compilation.

(2) Photographs. "Photographs" include still photographs, X-ray films, video tapes, and motion pictures.

(3) Original. An "original" of a writing or recording is the writing or recording itself or any counterpart intended to have the same effect by a person executing or issuing it. An "original" of a photograph includes the negative or any print therefrom. If data are stored in a computer or similar device, any printout or other output readable by sight, shown to reflect the data accurately, is an "original".

(4) Duplicate. A "duplicate" is a counterpart produced by the same impression as the original, or from the same matrix, or by means of photography, including enlargements and miniatures, or by mechanical or electronic re-recording, or by chemical reproduction, or by other equivalent techniques which accurately reproduces the original.

 

Rule 1002. Requirement of Original

To prove the content of a writing, recording, or photograph, the original writing, recording, or photograph is required, except as otherwise provided in these rules or by Act of Congress.

 

Rule 1003. Admissibility of Duplicates

A duplicate is admissible to the same extent as an original unless (1) a genuine question is raised as to the authenticity of the original or (2) in the circumstances it would be unfair to admit the duplicate in lieu of the original.

 

Rule 1004. Admissibility of Other Evidence of Contents

The original is not required, and other evidence of the contents of a writing, recording, or photograph is admissible if--

(1) Originals lost or destroyed. All originals are lost or have been destroyed, unless the proponent lost or destroyed them in bad faith; or

(2) Original not obtainable. No original can be obtained by any available judicial process or procedure; or

(3) Original in possession of opponent. At a time when an original was under the control of the party against whom offered, that party was put on notice, by the pleadings or otherwise, that the contents would be a subject of proof at the hearing, and that party does not produce the original at the hearing; or

(4) Collateral matters. The writing, recording, or photograph is not closely related to a controlling issue.

 

Rule 1005. Public Records

The contents of an official record, or of a document authorized to be recorded or filed and actually recorded or filed, including data compilations in any form, if otherwise admissible, may be proved by copy, certified as correct in accordance with rule 902 or testified to be correct by a witness who has compared it with the original. If a copy which complies with the foregoing cannot be obtained by the exercise of reasonable diligence, then other evidence of the contents may be given.

 

PART 2. GENERAL DEFINITIONS AND PRINCIPLES OF INTERPRETATION

 

§ 1-201. General Definitions.

(a) Unless the context otherwise requires, words or phrases defined in this section, or in the additional definitions contained in other articles of [the Uniform Commercial Code] that apply to particular articles or parts thereof, have the meanings stated.

(b) Subject to definitions contained in other articles of [the Uniform Commercial Code] that apply to particular articles or parts thereof:

(1) "Action", in the sense of a judicial proceeding, includes recoupment, counterclaim, set-off, suit in equity, and any other proceeding in which rights are determined.

(2) "Aggrieved party" means a party entitled to pursue a remedy.

(3) "Agreement", as distinguished from "contract", means the bargain of the parties in fact, as found in their language or inferred from other circumstances, including course of performance, course of dealing, or usage of trade as provided in Section 1-303.

(4) "Bank" means a person engaged in the business of banking and includes a savings bank, savings and loan association, credit union, and trust company.

(5) "Bearer" means a person in possession of a negotiable instrument, document of title, or certificated security that is payable to bearer or indorsed in blank.

(6) "Bill of lading" means a document evidencing the receipt of goods for shipment issued by a person engaged in the business of transporting or forwarding goods.

(7) "Branch" includes a separately incorporated foreign branch of a bank.

(8) "Burden of establishing" a fact means the burden of persuading the trier of fact that the existence of the fact is more probable than its nonexistence.

(9) "Buyer in ordinary course of business" means a person that buys goods in good faith, without knowledge that the sale violates the rights of another person in the goods, and in the ordinary course from a person, other than a pawnbroker, in the business of selling goods of that kind. A person buys goods in the ordinary course if the sale to the person comports with the usual or customary practices in the kind of business in which the seller is engaged or with the seller's own usual or customary practices. A person that sells oil, gas, or other minerals at the wellhead or minehead is a person in the business of selling goods of that kind. A buyer in ordinary course of business may buy for cash, by exchange of other property, or on secured or unsecured credit, and may acquire goods or documents of title under a preexisting contract for sale. Only a buyer that takes possession of the goods or has a right to recover the goods from the seller under Article 2 may be a buyer in ordinary course of business. "Buyer in ordinary course of business" does not include a person that acquires goods in a transfer in bulk or as security for or in total or partial satisfaction of a money debt.

(10) "Conspicuous", with reference to a term, means so written, displayed, or presented that a reasonable person against which it is to operate ought to have noticed it. Whether a term is "conspicuous" or not is a decision for the court. Conspicuous terms include the following: (A) a heading in capitals equal to or greater in size than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same or lesser size; and (B) language in the body of a record or display in larger type than the surrounding text, or in contrasting type, font, or color to the surrounding text of the same size, or set off from surrounding text of the same size by symbols or other marks that call attention to the language.

(11) "Consumer" means an individual who enters into a transaction primarily for personal, family, or household purposes.

(12) "Contract", as distinguished from "agreement", means the total legal obligation that results from the parties' agreement as determined by [the Uniform Commercial Code] as supplemented by any other applicable laws.

(13) "Creditor" includes a general creditor, a secured creditor, a lien creditor, and any representative of creditors, including an assignee for the benefit of creditors, a trustee in bankruptcy, a receiver in equity, and an executor or administrator of an insolvent debtor's or assignor's estate.

 (15) "Delivery", with respect to an instrument, document of title, or chattel paper, means voluntary transfer of possession.

(16) "Document of title" includes bill of lading, dock warrant, dock receipt, warehouse receipt or order for the delivery of goods, and also any other document which in the regular course of business or financing is treated as adequately evidencing that the person in possession of it is entitled to receive, hold, and dispose of the document and the goods it covers. To be a document of title, a document must purport to be issued by or addressed to a bailee and purport to cover goods in the bailee's possession which are either identified or are fungible portions of an identified mass.

(17) "Fault" means a default, breach, or wrongful act or omission.

 

(19) "Genuine" means free of forgery or counterfeiting.

 

7 Comments in Response to

Comment by Anita L.
Entered on:

 

The meeting place has been changed due to size of group:                                                 It is at WASHINGTON PARK                                      in Phoenix, Arizona                                2240 West Citrus Way, Phoenix.                             (About a half mile south of Glendale avenue)   Saturday 11/28 and Sunday 11/29 from 10 am to 5 pm both days.
Comment by Anita L.
Entered on:

FURTHER CLARIFICATIONS:

The Seminar is being held on Saturday and Sunday the 28 and 29, and the Speaker is Mickey Paoletta of Harrisburg, PA.

You can read about him on these websites, www.mickeyonbanking.org and http://www.citizensreformcenter.com

Please do not call the number listed in the body of the article as they are not connected to this event.

All other info is correct.

Thanks.

 

 

Comment by Ed Price
Entered on:

Implications are that the National Debt is not a debt, but rather a creation of new funds just like the rest of the debt has been. If this is true, should we get all our IRS money back, since it is IRS payments that repay the National Debt, and are the measure that controls how much the Government can borrow from the FED in the future?

Comment by Ed Price
Entered on:

If Mortgage Revocation catches on, will the value of the dollar decrease or increase?

If mortgages can be successfully be eliminated, what about other make-believe debt? Non-secured credit card debt can be easily canceled already.

Is this something that will work in other countries as well, or do the US laws make it something that can only be done here?

When it is realized on large scale that all the legal lending institution loans never were loans at all, will the FED be charged with fraud and have to return the money to the people?

If the FED is shut down, will we be able to get our false-loan payment funds from payments that we made to the banks over the years back from it?

Which of our Senators and Representatives will we indight with treason for not shutting the FED down years ago?

Comment by Powell Gammill
Entered on:

Morpheus must be in the Matrix.  I fixed it.  But since I wouldn't want you to be compelled to read the notice a third time...though the info is vast and important:

Where:
Freedoms Phoenix Workshop
750 W Amelia Ave (Major Crossroads: 7th Ave and Indian School)
Phoenix, AZ 85013
(623) 252-9CAM (CameraFRAUD)

2-DAY MORTGAGE WORKSHOP: HOW TO STOP FORECLOSURES!


NOVEMBER 27-28, 2009, 10 AM TO 5:00 PM

Comment by Gregory Davis
Entered on:

Where is the seminar located?  Same question as the lady before me.

Comment by Maddawg Mcclowski
Entered on:

 I've read this thread twice and theres no address.


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:

http://freedomsphoenix.thinkpenguin.com/