Article Image

4409 -- Judicial misconduct Exposed: Judge Caryl K. Parker

Written by Subject: Videos by 4409
Please call the Commission on Judicial Conduct today and ask that Carly K. Parker bar# 005833 be investigated, suspended and/or fired for judicial misconduct. (602) 452-3200.

Caryl is single handily eroding public confidence. Email the Commission at

Forward the video and/or email the Commission on Judicial Conduct. 1501 W. Washington Street, Suite 229. Phoenix, AZ 85007.

Ask that they fire or suspend Judge pro temp Caryl K. Parker bar# 005833 for judicial misconduct.

One of the things judges are suppose to do is give the people the ILLUSION of justice. She is such a horrible actor she can even pretend to give justice.

The judge actually said on the record "No, I will not read your motions"

This is what we are dealing with people. A complete rogue outlaw mafia.

Canon law which judges are to obey.

Canon 2

A judge shall avoid impropriety and the "appearance" of impropriety in all of the judge's activities.

A. A judge shall respect and comply with the law*, shall avoid impropriety and the "appearance" of impropriety in all of the judge's activities, and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

Commentary. - Public confidence in the judiciary is eroded by irresponsible or improper conduct by judges

Canon 3

A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially and diligently.

(4) A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants, jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official capacity, and shall require* similar conduct of lawyers, and of staff, court officials, and others subject to the judge's direction and control.

(5) A judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, by words or conduct manifest bias or prejudice

Failure to follow procedure. - The deliberate failure to follow mandatory criminal procedures constitutes a violation of the Judicial Code of Ethics. In re Markle, 174 W.Va. 550, 328 S.E.2d 157 (1984); In re Wharton, 175 W.Va. 348, 332 S.E.2d 650 (1985).

For Photo Radar tickets contact Michael at

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by Powell Gammill
Entered on:

I wish I could tell you 4409 is full of it, but he is completely correct in this.  Appalling.

Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network: