Article Image

Individuals present 9/11 evidence to Congressman Ed Pastor on World Trade Center collapse

Written by Subject: 911 / World Trade Center
PHOENIX - Days before the ninth anniversary of the 9/11 attacks local supporters of a national group say they have shocking new findings to report.


The presenters agree with 1270 verified architects and engineers who contest the 9/11 Commission and NIST reports claims.  Some of their unanswered questions include: 
How could three steel framed buildings come down at near the rate of free fall in the direction of maximum resistance?

What caused Building 7 to collapse when it was hit by neither plane nor debris?
 
Where did the Thermite residue in and around ground zero come from?
 
Where is the video evidence supporting a plane hitting the pentagon?
 
How could flight 77 which was one hundred feet wide, create only a 15 foot hole in the pentagon?
 
How could a horrible pilot who could not even fly a Cessna, fly a 757, into a the pentagon, using a maneuver that is beyond the design capability of the plane?
 
Where is the plane wreckage from flight 93: i.e. wings of the plane, engines, seats, bodies and luggage which crashed into the ground in Shanksville, Pennsylvania?
 
The group won't say who caused the World Trade Center to collapse or why, but they definitely have a long list of unanswered question and are committed to “Never Forget”

At the festivities outside Ed Pastors we get a surprise visit by george Bush who proudly proclaims 9/11 was an inside job

6 Comments in Response to

Comment by Steve A Truther
Entered on:

http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/297349 Architects, engineers say they have proof 9/11 was a 'lie' By Andrew Moran.


New York - The group Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth say they have important evidence that proves the official story of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks was "a lie” and “a fraud.” On Saturday, the United States remembers the tragic events of Sept. 11, 2001, which killed 3,000 Americans and was the basis for the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. Ceremonies will occur all over the country. However, one group says they have found recent evidence, which proves the official story of what happened on that devastating day is a “lie,” according to Press TV. The proof, says Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, shows pre-set explosives that were used in the demolition of the World Trade Center. The group further adds that molten metal was found after the 9/11 inquiry. “Jet fuel and office fires cannot melt iron or steel. They don't even get half as hot as that and so something else was there, very energetic material that had to be placed throughout the buildings,” said Greg Roberts of the non-profit organization. Meanwhile, Richard Gage, founder of the organization who has toured the globe speaking at conferences, said: “Once we take the blinders off, we can see. There are very few people in America who have taken the blinders off. So we are assisting people by showing them the evidence.” Gage further explained that more than 600 architects are more concerned over the collapse of World Trade Center building 7, which was not hit by an airplane and was destroyed in 6.5 seconds. The group is now calling upon United States Attorney General Eric Holder to request a federal grand jury investigation into the “largest crime of the century.”

Comment by Shawn GodGunsGutsGlory
Entered on:

That was awesome!

And the local media did a fair job presenting this and didn't twist the story! AMEN!

Comment by Morpheus Titania
Entered on:

backadude:   Let me ask you a hypothetical and somewhat redundant question:   say you owned a gigantic building and all of a sudden it just collapsed, then you were denied the insurance money because of a technicality.  Later 1270 architects and engineers wrote you a letter telling you that they felt the technicality was invalid.  Would you investigate what their concerns?  Don’t be ridiculous and say you wouldn’t.

Comment by Nick Barnett
Entered on:

"The base of WTC-7 building was badly damaged by the collapse of the colossal structures of the Twin Towers and had to be demolished."

Is that why NIST was unable to come up with a reason for the collapse of WC7 and the 9/11 Commission Report completely omitted the destruction of Building 7? 

Comment by Anonymous
Entered on:

     Whatever the 1270 architects and engineers present as evidence that 911 was NOT an Al Qaeda terrorist attacks is NON SEQUITUR – repeat – NON SEQUITUR! This invented claim that the terrorist-manned airlines that struck the Twin Towers, were just CAMERA TRICKS, insult the intelligence of the American public.

    The post-911 video taken by upbeat radical conspiracy myth-makers long after the Pentagon crush showing no airplanes and hardly a sprinkle of debris on the ground after the clean-up, does not mean that the airlines that went down which millions saw on that fateful day were merely CAMERA TRICKS and that there were no jetliners that crushed because all of these were just in the mind of criminal government plotters, which to me I am sorry to say, is a mind-boggling abuse of the public’s mind too ghoulish to ignore.

   The hole on the ground presented to support a hallucinating accusation that it was hardly the result of a plane crush, is a red herring – who could say that this picture is not the tricksters’ video ploy to trick the public into believing that their anti-government "evidence" were not a delusional concoction or science fiction?

    Anti-government conspirators are proud of the myth they created – although how twisted and nutty it is -- that because everything was just a camera trick, the Twin Towers did not burn and did not collapse after it was struck by terrorist-piloted airplanes but were demolished by government operatives from within using certain chemical explosives! The American public is not mentally retarded to believe that nonsense.

      The base of WTC-7 building was badly damaged by the collapse of the colossal structures of the Twin Towers and had to be demolished. The kind of controlled demolition used was what demolition experts called "pulled" demolition – no kaboommmm [!!] heard when dynamites or explosives are used to bring down buildings to the ground. Conspiracy-story-tellers are ignorant about this kind of controlled demolition, or if not, they simply ignore it [bad for their story]. There are no answers to their questions – no need to answer them – because those questions are ridiculous and millions of Americans believe paying attention to them is just a waste of time. Nonetheless, media-wise, this macabre Sherlock Holmes indulgence is a good reading … a good television show, like most Syfy thrillers are, which is just what headline-grabbers need, especially what politically correct politicians want.

    Tongressmen in Congress playing with the minds of the people that 911 was the fault of all Americans and that Osama bin Laden who planned this mass murder and carried out by his assassins in the name of Islamic Jihad are not to be blamed because the carnage was engineered by the U.S government, is a media blitz bordering on treason. But grabbing a headline is all that matters to those politicos whose use to tired Americans in their daily life is no better than that of expendable toilet papers.

    The presentation of 1270 architects and engineers, who allegedly believe that the collapse of the structures was engineered from within, is a PRECISE number. How many more architects and engineers are there who believe otherwise? It was not cited because the number could be tremendously awesome it makes this 1270 a tiny speck in the eye.

     Here’s this saying worth a ton of advice: 1270 architects and engineers saying that the government did it when it did not, does not mean that the government did it. This intentionally crafted imagination of reality is neither real nor right. Let’s learn a lesson from this advice: When you are wrong, you are wrong, and ten thousand angels in heaven saying that maybe you are right does not or will not make it right.

     But I am not here to take anyone’s right to imagine anything under the sun. I am for the freedom of the mind even though how badly it works. Neither I am here to enrage further anyone for exercising the right to chastise the government of wrongdoing if there is any. I would even say, go for it! However, having said that, an insult of our collective intelligence for whatever reason that is, should never come to pass without at least a whimper, otherwise we are in a perpetual revolt against tyranny we create.

Comment by Anonymous
Entered on:

   Whatever the 1270 architects and engineers present as evidence that 911 was NOT an Al Qaeda terrorist attacks is NON SIQUITUR – repeat – NON SIQUITUR! This invented claim that the terrorist-manned airlines that struck the Twin Towers, were just CAMERA TRICKS, insult the intelligence of the American public.

    The post-911 video taken by upbeat radical conspiracy myth-makers long after the Pentagon crush showing no airplanes and hardly a sprinkle of debris on the ground after the clean-up, does not mean that the airlines that went down which millions saw on that fateful day were merely CAMERA TRICKS and that there were no jetliners that crushed because all of these were just in the mind of criminal government plotters, which to me I am sorry to say, is a mind-boggling abuse of the public’s mind too ghoulish to ignore.

   The hole on the ground presented to support a hallucinating accusation that it was hardly the result of a plane crush, is a red herring – who could say that this picture is not the tricksters’ video ploy to trick the public into believing that their anti-government "evidence" were not a delusional concoction or science fiction?

    Anti-government conspirators are proud of the myth they created – although how twisted and nutty it is -- that because everything was just a camera trick, the Twin Towers did not burn and did not collapse after it was struck by terrorist-piloted airplanes but were demolished by government operatives from within using certain chemical explosives! The American public is not mentally retarded to believe that nonsense.

      The base of WTC-7 building was badly damaged by the collapse of the colossal structures of the Twin Towers and had to be demolished. The kind of controlled demolition used was what demolition experts called "pulled" demolition – no kaboommmm [!!] heard when dynamites or explosives are used to bring down buildings to the ground. Conspiracy-story-tellers are ignorant about this kind of controlled demolition, or if not, they simply ignore it [bad for their story]. There are no answers to their questions – no need to answer them – because those questions are ridiculous and millions of Americans believe paying attention to them is just a waste of time. Nonetheless, media-wise, this macabre Sherlock Holmes indulgence is a good reading … a good television show, like most Syfy thrillers are, which is just what headline-grabbers need, especially what politically correct politicians want.

    Tongressmen in Congress playing with the minds of the people that 911 was the fault of all Americans and that Osama bin Laden who planned this mass murder and carried out by his assassins in the name of Islamic Jihad are not to be blamed because the carnage was engineered by the U.S government, is a media blitz bordering on treason. But grabbing a headline is all that matters to those politicos whose use to tired Americans in their daily life is no better than that of expendable toilet papers.

    The presentation of 1270 architects and engineers, who allegedly believe that the collapse of the structures was engineered from within, is a PRECISE number. How many more architects and engineers are there who believe otherwise? It was not cited because the number could be tremendously awesome it makes this 1270 a tiny speck in the eye.

     Here’s this saying worth a ton of advice: 1270 architects and engineers saying that the government did it when it did not, does not mean that the government did it. This intentionally crafted imagination of reality is neither real nor right. Let’s learn a lesson from this advice: When you are wrong, you are wrong, and ten thousand angels in heaven saying that maybe you are right does not or will not make it right.

     But I am not here to take anyone’s right to imagine anything under the sun. I am for the freedom of the mind even though how badly it works. Neither I am here to enrage further anyone for exercising the right to chastise the government of wrongdoing if there is any. I would even say, go for it! However, having said that, an insult of our collective intelligence for whatever reason that is, should never come to pass without at least a whimper, otherwise we are in a perpetual revolt against tyranny we create.


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


http://freedomsphoenix.thinkpenguin.com/