ON AIR NOWClick to Play
Streaming Live from LibertyTalk.fm
Pop Out Window
Until it happens to me, I probably won't get excited enough to do anything.
Police do not act randomly on their own. Not generally, anyway. They have chains of command. Their orders come from up above.
The mayor and the city council tell the police chief to get some kind of a basic job done. The mayor may be on orders (Constitutionally correct or not) from Obama - maybe even directly from Obama. The police chief figures out a method to use to get the job done. He issues orders.
The only way to stop this kind of activity is to do it the way that it has always been done. Like 4409 we ALL need to advertise what is going on. Then we need to talk to our governing officials - mayor, city council, police commissioner, police chiefs of the various departments, all those who are in authority and issue the orders.
We, also, need to become active in the local governing process. Somebody else will do it, but if they don't, WE need to do it. This is the only way to force Government back under the Constitution.
Government Intends to Kill the Fourth Amendment
Police are alleged to train drug sniff dogs to give false drug alerts on cue—so
police can circumvent the Fourth Amendment to search vehicles and other
property. Police may be motivated to circumvent the Fourth Amendment to Forfeit
Corrupt Police that train dogs to give false drug alerts to search
property, might plant evidence supposedly discovered by their drug-dog to make
arrests and seize property. Imagine if police whose compensation increasingly
is dependent on asset forfeiture could enter Citizens' homes without evidence
of wrongdoing based only on a drug dog's alert. The US Supreme Court has decided
to review Florida v. Jardines, a case that concerns if a dog sniff at the front
door of a home (is a search) that requires probable cause.
Is this where America is Headed? The developing U.S. Police Surveillance State
intends to completely thrash the Fourth Amendment, not require warrants to hide
surveillance cameras and listening devices on private property; when searching
Americans’ electronic transactions, phone calls and mail—when spying on
Citizens’ activities. Congress and Federal Courts have so weakened the Fourth
Amendment e.g. using the USA Patriot Act that Government and law enforcement
(without probable cause) search Citizens’ homes and confidential information
(in hopes of finding evidence) to prosecute Americans in criminal, Civil and
Asset Forfeiture Proceedings.
the coming U.S. Police Surveillance State expect higher unemployment, the
economy to stagnate and huge increases in federal taxes to support the
Surveillance State. Historically once Citizens fear a Government Surveillance
Police State they don’t risk investing—in homes, income producing property or
businesses a police state government can confiscate (without due process). For
example: U.S. Government can use the National Defense Authorization Act of 2012
to charge defendants without providing evidence that all of a Citizen’s assets
are subject to civil government forfeiture under the USA Patriot Act—claim a
Citizen supported an undefined terrorist act or hostilities; charge without providing evidence that a Citizen’s associate,
tenant, visitor or employee committed a crime or violation that made their real
property, business and or other assets subject to government forfeiture.
In a Police Surveillance State, government employees are usually paid higher
salaries and more benefits compared to working citizens spied on by Government.
individuals and businesses that support or are connected to the developing U.S.
Government Police State will more easily secure government employment and
business contracts while most other Americans will be shut out. That happened
in Nazi Germany after Hitler started enforcing laws similar to The National
Defense Authorization Act of 2012 that Pres. Obama signed among others. Some
U.S. corporations and their operatives work so closely with U.S. Government and
law enforcement to spy on, arrest Americans and forfeit their property, they
appear to have merged with U.S. Government—similar
to Hitler’s SS and (private secret police) Gestapo that merged its police and
spy activities with the Reich Government to target German Citizens for arrest
and property forfeiture that opposed the Nazi Government.
a Total U.S. Government Police Surveillance State take over America, expect
most tangible assets owned by Americans will depreciate, become difficult to
sell. Once large numbers of Americans fear a U.S. Police State, most consumers
will buy only products absolutely necessary. Expect corporations and
individuals protected by a U.S. Police State, that don’t have to fear U.S.
Government or police confiscating their property, will profit buying up
Americans’’ distressed real and personal property; including property
confiscated by U.S. Government. That happened in Nazi Germany.
Americans will be afraid to involve themselves with grass-roots causes. Under
NDAA, U.S. Government or the President can charge any activity, statement,
communication supported or (was directly-aligned) with an individual or group
that government deemed a threat to National Security to order someone’s arrest;
It appears problematic at some point, Americans won’t be allowed employment or
the right to operate a business unless approved by Homeland Security; and
Homeland will prohibit without explanation Americans using pubic and private
transportation without Government approval.
Join us on our
Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:
Forty Four O Nine
Stats by StatCounter