A Turning Point in the Nonexistent Pandemic?
by Stephen Lendman
Reading lines scripted for him by a teleprompter on Tuesday, the imposter in the White House again shunned reality in favor of continued mass deception about all things flu/covid.
In response to fraudster/angel of death Walensky saying that the Pharma-controlled CDC "endorsed" kill shots for kids aged-5 - 11 with Pfizer's experimental/hazardous to health mRNA gene-altering drug, the fake Biden turned reality on its head as follows, saying:
"Today, we have reached a turning point in our battle against" seasonal flu called covid since last year, he failed to explain, adding:
"(A)uthorization of a safe (sic), effective (sic) (jab) for children ages 5 to 11…will allow parents to end months of anxious worrying about their kids (end), and reduce the extent to which children spread the virus to others (end)."
"It is a major step forward for our nation in our fight to defeat the virus (sic)."
Toxic jabs destroy health and don't protect.
Jabbing young kids has nothing to do with protecting them against anything.
They're all about destroying the health of 28 million young children with intent to exterminate as many as possible.
Most parents oppose jabbing their kids with what's experimental. See below.
Mass-jabbing spreads viral droplets to others.
The fake Biden lied claiming otherwise.
What he falsely called a "major step" toward defeating flu/covid is all about spreading it maximum numbers of people — notably to ones targeted for mass-extermination.
Commenting on the above, WaPo falsely claimed that mass-jabbing young kids will "immunize" them against infection (sic).
Polar opposite is true.
Parents permitting their children to be jabbed with Pfizer's toxic mRNA kill shots should be prosecuted for child abuse.
Not according to NYT fake news, falsely claiming that "parents (are) desperate (sic) to get their (young) children at least partially (jabbed) by Thanksgiving," adding:
OK'ing jabs for 5 - 11-year-old kids "came as a relief not only to millions of families exhausted by the pandemic (that doesn't exist), but to (anti)public health officials who said it might help prevent a repeat of the terrifying surge of disease that swept the country last winter (sic)."
According to polls, most US parents are hesitant or opposed to getting their children used as guinea pigs for an experimental/high-risk-to-health drug.
Earlier polls showed a majority of US parents opposed to jabs for offspring under age-12.
A new Kaiser Family Foundation poll — conducted from Oct. 14 - 24 — showed that most parents will not get their young kids jabbed right away.
Around a third of parents oppose jabbing their kids with what's experimental.
Only about one-fourth of polled parents said they'll get their young children jabbed as soon as doses are available.
Safety tops the list of concerns parents have about jabs.
Three-fourths of surveyed parents said they're "very (or) somewhat" concerned about longterm adverse side effects.
Over 70% are fearful of serious adverse events.
Two-thirds of parents polled expressed concern about adversely affecting the fertility of their children.
Other reasons cited include distrust of government and Pharma claims, as well as inadequate testing.
Many parents also don't believe young children with strong immune systems need jabs.
Fraudsters Fauci and Walensky want maximum numbers of all-aged Americans and others abroad irreparably harmed by toxic jabs designed for this purpose.
On Wednesday, Fauci lied claiming that jabbing young children is "a good idea (sic)."
Most US parents disagree.
Jabbing all age groups in the US and abroad is all about aiming for mass-casualties.
With nothing remotely safe and effective about them, shunning them is crucial for everyone everywhere.
A Final Comment
Epidemiologist Paul Elias Alexander PhD opposes jabbing children.
It's because their "natural defenses" protect them from viral infection.
If contract flu/covid, symptoms are highly likely to be mild, full recovery virtual certain.
Facing very little risk, "no data…evidence…or science…justif(ies)" jabbing them.
Based on science, data clearly show that "under no circumstance should we expose the risk of (flu/covid) injections to children."
"(S)ubjecting (them) to this risk to protect adults is perverse, reckless, and very dangerous. There (are) no proper safety data."
"(T)here are no benefits and only risks of adverse outcomes."
Other truth-telling medical professionals share the above view.
Children need no extra protection. Their strong immune systems keep them safe.
Separately, ethicist Julie Ponese PhD said informed consent on all things flu/covid is virtually nonexistent in the West and elsewhere — because of fear-mongering and coercive mandates.
Unjustifiably let go by London, Ontario-based Western University's Huron College for speaking candidly about mandated flu/covid jabs, she called mandating them an act of coercion.
It renders the principles of voluntary and informed consent on all things health related null and void — a flagrant international law breach.
What's going on throughout the West and elsewhere is all about inflicting maximum harm on maximum numbers of people — in defiance of the rule of law.
Our fundamental rights are being trampled on with intent to eliminate them altogether.
VISIT MY WEBSITE: stephenlendman.wordpress.com (Home - Stephen Lendman). Contact at firstname.lastname@example.org.
My two Wall Street books are timely reading:
"How Wall Street Fleeces America: Privatized Banking, Government Collusion, and Class War"
"Banker Occupation: Waging Financial War on Humanity"