Article Image

What is the "Credit Freeze"?

Written by Subject: Economy - Economics USA

With alarm bells still ringing about a “credit freeze” it seems as if taxpayers should know exactly what kind of credit they're being asked to un-freeze. Perhaps The Powers that Be are unwilling to offer a simple explanation is because the simple truth is far scarier than the “fire and brimstone raining down on Main Street” hyperbole: right now big banks do not want to loan to each other.

At the end of the day, the bank's books have to balance just like any other business. However, the bank has an additional ratio that has to balance whenever the teller windows are closed. Their cash and reserves (deposits with the Federal Reserve Bank) must be equal to or greater than some percentage of demand deposits with the bank.

While the reserve requirements are different for different types of deposits, we can simplify the explanation by saying, in the US, a bank's cash and reserves must equal 10% of deposits. For example, if a bank has customer demand deposits totaling $210 billion at the end of the day, it must have $21 billion in cash and reserves.

While banks are historically good at approximating their cash and reserve needs from day to day, they will, of course, be a little long or short of the 10% requirement on any given night. If a bank is short, they borrow reserves from other banks who have excess reserves that night. Over the next day or three, the borrowing bank will use incoming deposits or asset sales to pay back the loan. These overnight loans are facilitated by the Federal Reserve.

The rate of interest on these overnight loans is called the Fed Funds Rate. When you hear that the Fed has raised or lowered interest rates, this is normally the rate being referred to. It is important to note, however, that the rate set by the Fed is a target, not a set rate. While banks that are short on reserves must borrow, banks that are long do not have to lend. Therefore, the actual interest charged on an overnight loan may be higher than the Fed Funds target to entice banks with excess reserves to make interbank loans.

If a bank cannot borrow from other banks or quickly sell assets to meet their reserve requirement, they must borrow directly from the Federal Reserve's discount window. Because there is a stigma about being a bank that can't borrow, the discount window is used as a last resort.
At the current Fed Funds target of 1.5%, calculating simple interest on an overnight loan gives us a cost to the borrowing bank of $41,095 in interest per day per billion dollars borrowed. At 3%, the cost jumps to $82,191 per day. As recently as last week, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) was 4.8% meaning banks were (ostensibly) charging each other $131,506 per billion per day.

This is the “credit freeze” we've been hearing so much about. Strong banks have excess reserves to lend, they are just unwilling to lend to each other so these overnight loans have become very, very expensive. In other words, lending banks are calling out borrowing banks as being practically insolvent (all fractional reserve banks are technically insolvent).

And, who could blame them? In Washington Mutual's waning days, depositors had withdrawn almost $17 billion, depleting their reserves; as much of WaMu's assets consisted of mortgages that nobody wants to buy at current valuations, other banks were scared to lend their reserves to it. It doesn't make sense for a bank to lend to another bank that is depleting reserves and can't sell assets quickly to cover the loan.

But, here's the rub. While effective rates for interbank loans to WaMu or similarly leveraged banks may be high enough to be considered frozen, good credit was and is freely available at good interest rates. It took a special program to freeze credit for everybody and spread the pain to the rest of the world.
Now, with the manufactured credit freeze in full swing, the Fed is offering unlimited dollar 7, 28, and 89-day loans through the European Central Bank, Bank of England, and the Swiss National Bank on “appropriate collateral” (read, mortgage portfolios with fanciful valuations). The question remains, however, if banks will willingly participate in the program. In the US, banks who aren't over leveraged are understandably reticent. In fact, the nine largest banks in the country are being forced to sell shares of preferred stock to the US Treasury, to destigmatize the program.
Let that sink in. The nine largest banks are being forced into a nationalization scheme, with all its attendant problems. What chance does the Bank of Winemucca have against state-owned banks who just happen to be the nine largest in the country?  (click on the picture at right to see Peter Schiff and Robert Poole discuss this nationalization with Glenn Beck)
The recent past has seen all the “liquidity” the Fed is pumping in going straight to bank reserves and not interbank lending. Will these new programs change that?

Join us on our Social Networks:


Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:

Purse.IO Save on All Amazon Purchases