Don’t Cherish the 2nd Amendment! 
Freedom's Phoenix – "Uncovering the Secrets and Exposing the Lies"


Bitcoin Average: $3536.24 Gold: $1282.76 Change: $(0.79) Silver: $15.36 Change: $(0.04)

Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute BCH to
Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute Funding by
PayPal or Credit Card

Sign-up for FREE
Daily Newsletter

See Complete Menu

Special Editions
Translate Page
RSS Feeds

Declare Your

with Ernest Hancock

Front Page
Page Two

Freedom's Phoenix
Online Magazine

Freedom Forum
Letters to the Editor
Report The News




Search by Keyword

    Contents by Subject
    Radio/TV Shows
    Feature Articles
    Opinion Columns
    News Stories
    Newsletters List
    Reference Links

Quantum Vibe
OpenBazaar Hosting by Agorist Hosting
Purse.IO Save on All Amazon Purchases


Sign up to receive the Freedom's Phoenix Headlines by Email.

Make a one-time or periodic contribution.
Use your credit card or PayPal account.

Join us on our
Social Networks

Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:


Don’t Cherish the 2nd Amendment!

Don’t Cherish the 2nd Amendment!

By: Marc J. Victor

   I was recently asked to write an article which would be of interest to people who cherish the 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution.#1  Few people have more experience talking to others who cherish the 2nd Amendment than me.  I am the only attorney who is regularly invited to speak to groups of people in Arizona who attend the Crossroads of the West#2 gun shows about their rights and responsibilities as firearms owners.  Indeed, I enjoy talking to people who cherish the 2nd Amendment, and I acknowledge, agree and respect the rights of free and responsible adults to acquire, possess and sell whatever weapons they peacefully obtain.  I am far more concerned about the government bearing arms than I am about responsible citizens bearing arms.

    However, I often wonder if the people who cherish the 2nd Amendment also cherish freedom.  They are not the same concepts.  Like everything else in the Constitution, the 2nd Amendment is subject to interpretation.  Until the year 2008, it was a subject of much debate whether the 2nd Amendment protects an individual right to bear arms or a “collective right”#3 to allow the states to organize a national guard.  Although the United States Supreme Court determined an individual right is indeed protected, I wonder if those same 2nd Amendment cherishers would have such warm feelings towards the 2nd Amendment had the Supreme Court sided with the collectivists?  Moreover, there is no doubt the courts will now march toward restricting such individual right as they have with all other individual rights  “protected” by the Constitution. 

#1 - The 2nd Amendment to the United States Constitution says, “…the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.”  Incidentally, the meaning has always seemed clear to me.
#3 - Please don’t ask me to define a “collective right.”  The notion of a “collective right” is unintelligible to me.  I suspect the concept was originated by some collectivist minded anti-freedom thug. 

    The 2nd Amendment, as with everything else in the Constitution, is subject to interpretation, limitation, expansion, or virtual nullification by those nine political appointees on the United States Supreme Court.  How many of your rights are protected by the Contracts Clause or the Privileges and Immunities Clauses or the 9th Amendment?  With a different group of nine political appointees, those could have been important sections of the Constitution in terms of protecting freedom.  Of course, the 2nd Amendment could be repealed.  I suspect many people would not be inclined to turn their firearms into the government for want of a right to bear arms.

    I admit there is no escape from the necessity of interpreting written words.  Our language and thoughts are not precise enough for perfect communication.  However, we should recognize and admit the 2nd Amendment, as well as the rest of the Constitution, is merely a collection of words written on paper.  By themselves, they have no power to do anything at all.  The mindset of the people interpreting and enforcing those words is what matters.

    I would much prefer to live among liberty minded people without any  constitution or written laws whatsoever than big government loving busy bodies who live pursuant to a written constitution which grants them rights to do whatever the government deems appropriate.  There is no substitute for liberty minded people, and nothing else whatsoever can preserve liberty; not the words of the 2nd Amendment or the Constitution or the congress or your favorite politician; nothing.  Freedom is either respected by your neighbors or it is not.  No words can get the job done. 

    Whether a person cherishes the 2nd Amendment is of little importance to me.  I am more interested in knowing what respect, if any, they accord to the rights of others to control their bodies, their money, their property and their time.  There are endless arguments, restrictions, interpretations, and outright lies anti-freedom inclined people will advance in attempts to impose their will on others. 

    As an example, some people, with agendas to ban firearms, argue firearms are responsible for much of the horrible violence in our society.  However, as research has shown, a greater number of guns in a community does not equate to more violence.  Indeed, the opposite is true.#4  Nonetheless, as a consequence of the erroneous “firearms cause violence” assertion, many people will support laws from registration and licensing to outright bans on firearms. 

    Always ignored within the “guns cause violence” crowd is the reality that anti-freedom government policies, not guns, are the root cause of the violence in question.  Government policies which restrict freedom result in black markets where disputes are not settled peacefully in court but rather violently in streets.  If a pro-freedom policy was adopted regarding drugs, the horrible drug cartel related violence, which always involves firearms, would be more akin to the peaceful purchase and sale of alcohol.  I never hear about the Budweiser guy and the Miller guy breaking into violence in the streets.  I suspect they don’t even carry guns.  In any event, the gun is not responsible for the violence.

    There are undoubtedly bad and violent people in the world who cannot be dissuaded, under any circumstances, from violence involving firearms, knives, bats, fists, whatever.  However, nothing creates and nurtures a culture of violence and conflict like anti-freedom government policies. 

    We will not have peace in our world unless and until people realize freedom is a necessary prerequisite for peace.  We should not be surprised trespassing on the rights of others often results in violence.  The fact firearms are used to effectuate violence is not evidence firearms are bad.  Firearms are neutral.  Firearms are mere tools. 

    Likewise, the 2nd Amendment is neutral.  It is also a mere tool.  Those words can be used by freedom inclined people to protect liberties.  They can also be used by people who seek to restrict liberty, forcefully impose their views on others and cause conflict.  Although I cherish freedom, and all the concepts which are necessary to a free and peaceful society, I do not cherish the 2nd Amendment or any other collection of mere words. 

#4 - See, More Guns, Less Crime: Understanding Crime and Gun Control Laws by John R. Lott Jr. 

Marc J. Victor is an Arizona State Bar Certified Specialist in Criminal Law and can be reached via his law firm website at

Additional related items you might find interesting:
News Link  •  Gun Rights
Credit Card Companies Have No Business Playing Second Amendment Censors
01-20-2019  •, By Frank Miniter  
News Link  •  Gun Rights
How gun control became an instrument of tyranny in Venezuela
01-18-2019  • 
Feature Article  •  More about Gun Rights
FIREARM PANIC BUYING - THEN & NOW (a brief history and prediction for 2019)
Chip Saunders
      Attorney For Freedom  
  Magazine / Newspaper
   Magazine Subscription Info
   Online Magazine List
   Newspaper Subscription Info
   Newspaper Issue List
RSS Feeds
   Articles RSS Feed
   Opinions RSS Feed
   Media RSS Feed
   Newsletter RSS Feed
   Smartphone Feed
   Podcast Feed
Radio / TV
   Declare Your Independence
      with Ernest Hancock

   Search by Keyword
   Contents Listed by Subject
   Radio / TV Show Archives
   Newsletter Archives
   News Links
   Feature Articles
   Opinion Columns
   Reference Links

Letters to the Editor
   List of Letters
   Write a Letter

Join Us
   Subscribe to Magazine
   Membership Sign-Up
   Be a Writer
   Be a Reporter
   Link to Us

   Buy Stuff – Sell Stuff

   Store on
More News
   Page Two
   Current News
   Freedom Forum
   Intro to Advertising with Us
   Magazine Advertising Rates
   Radio Advertising Rates
   Website Advertising Rates
Funding Center
   Support or Promote a Project
About Freedom's Phoenix
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Terms of Use
   Privacy Policy
   Writers List

Tutorials – Using This Site
   List of Tutorials
Media Resources
   News References
   Blog References
   Government References
The domain and name of this website are servicemarks of Ernest Hancock.
Website is Copyright © 2019 by Ernest Hancock.  All rights reserved worldwide.
4886 W Port Au Prince Ln, Glendale, AZ 85306 USA.
Website Designed by

Phoenix, Arizona
Time to display page: 0.023 Seconds -- Dynamic Page

Page Views:

free web stats

Stats by StatCounter