Freedom's Phoenix – "Uncovering the Secrets and Exposing the Lies"


Bitcoin Average: $47456.91 Gold: $1700.1 Change: $3.2 Silver: $25.22 Change: $(0.10)

Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute BCH to
Freedom's Phoenix

Contribute Funding by
PayPal or Credit Card

Sign-up for FREE
Daily Newsletter

See Complete Menu

Special Editions
Translate Page
RSS Feeds

Declare Your

with Ernest Hancock

Front Page
Page Two

Freedom's Phoenix
Online Magazine

Freedom Forum
Letters to the Editor
Report The News




Search by Keyword

    Contents by Subject
    Radio/TV Shows
    Feature Articles
    Opinion Columns
    News Stories
    Newsletters List
    Reference Links
OpenBazaar Hosting by Agorist Hosting


Sign up to receive the Freedom's Phoenix Headlines by Email.

Make a one-time or periodic contribution.
Use your credit card or PayPal account.

Join us on our
Social Networks

Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:




By: Julian Heicklen

Amendment VI of the U. S. Constitution states: “In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury....” It does not say:  “may  
enjoy.”  It  does not say: “if  the  accused chooses.” It does not say: “unless the accused
declines.” It does not say: “if the judge agrees.” It does not say: “unless the Supreme Court says otherwise.” It says that there shall be a jury trial.

Everyone in the criminal legal system knows that if a defendant declines a jury trial, it  is  
because his lawyer thinks or knows that his client is guilty. It is no longer possible for the
judge to be impartial.

The reason a defendant’s lawyer declines a jury trial is because he hopes to win the case in one of three ways:

1. He has some obscure legal argument that the jury (and maybe even the judge and/or prosecutor) do not understand.
2. The   judge owes the defendant’s lawyer something. The lawyers and the judge all know
each other and have opinions, grudges, and obligations with each other.
3. The defense lawyer or the defendant may be in a position to help the judge’s career if he wins.
This is particularly true if the defendant holds a relevant government job.

Consider the case of the killing of Sean Bell.  He was killed by police on his wedding day. His
bride-to-be received his corpse as a wedding present. The incident is described in detail at:

Wikipedia - Sean Bell Shooting Incident

“The Sean Bell shooting incident took place in the New York City borough of Queens on November 25, 2006, in which one Latino and two African-American men were shot at a total of fifty times by a team of both plainclothes and undercover NYPD officers (two of whom were themselves African-American), killing one of the men, Sean Bell, on the morning of his wedding day, and severely wounding two of his friends.[1] The incident  sparked  fierce  criticism  of  the  police  from some members of the public and drew comparisons to the 1999 killing of Amadou Diallo.[2] Three of the five detectives involved in the shooting went to trial [3] on charges ranging from manslaughter to reckless endangerment, and were acquitted.[4]” (see the web page for references).

The three detectives involved in the shooting were indicted  by   a  grand  jury  for   
manslaughter,  reckless endangerment, and assault. They waived a jury trial. The bench trial started on March 16, 2007.  All three detectives were found not guilty of all charges by Justice Arthur J. Cooperman.

Apparently the police department did not agree with the judge’s decision. Although the detectives were acquitted, the three of them and their commanding officer were fired or forced to resign on March 24, 2012.

If there had been a jury trial, the detectives were likely to have been found guilty of something"probably not first degree murder, but at least criminal negligence.  However, even it did
find the police not guilty, its verdict would have been more credible.

On the other hand the judge desperately needs the police to protect him. They may save his life.  There are lots of ex-criminals in the county that would like to kill him.

In a courtroom trial, there is only one impartial participant. That is the jury.

Julian Heicklen is a retired Chemistry Professor from Penn State University. He has been a libertarian activists for many years, has spent countless hours on the steps of court buildings handing out FIJA (Fully Informed Jury Association) information, as well as being an advocate for marijuana legalization. He has been arrested and incarcerated many, many times for his efforts to educate the public of government corruption, and fled to Israel on May 22nd, 2012 as a political exile and was granted Israeli citizenship at customs. Visit his webpage at TyrranyFighters.Com and Facebook.


Additional related items you might find interesting:
News Link  •  Giving Thanks
2020: Meh? or Yeah!
12-24-2020  • - Karen Kwiatkowski 
News Link  •  Giving Thanks
The Forgotten Front Porch Is Making a Comeback
09-27-2020  •  Newsyfi 
News Link  •  Giving Thanks
Fireside Chat Ep. 110 - If You're Not Grateful You're Not Happy
12-03-2019  •  Dennis Prager - Fireside Chat 
  Magazine / Newspaper
   Magazine Subscription Info
   Online Magazine List
   Newspaper Subscription Info
   Newspaper Issue List
RSS Feeds
   Articles RSS Feed
   Opinions RSS Feed
   Media RSS Feed
   Newsletter RSS Feed
   Smartphone Feed
   Podcast Feed
Radio / TV
   Declare Your Independence
      with Ernest Hancock

   Search by Keyword
   Contents Listed by Subject
   Radio / TV Show Archives
   Newsletter Archives
   News Links
   Feature Articles
   Opinion Columns
   Reference Links

Letters to the Editor
   List of Letters
   Write a Letter

Join Us
   Subscribe to Magazine
   Membership Sign-Up
   Be a Writer
   Be a Reporter
   Link to Us

   Buy Stuff – Sell Stuff

   Store on
More News
   Page Two
   Current News
   Freedom Forum
   Intro to Advertising with Us
   Magazine Advertising Rates
   Radio Advertising Rates
   Website Advertising Rates
Funding Center
   Support or Promote a Project
About Freedom's Phoenix
   About Us
   Contact Us
   Terms of Use
   Privacy Policy
   Writers List

Tutorials – Using This Site
   List of Tutorials
Media Resources
   News References
   Blog References
   Government References
The domain and name of this website are servicemarks of Ernest Hancock.
Website is Copyright © 2021 by Ernest Hancock.  All rights reserved worldwide.
4886 W Port Au Prince Ln, Glendale, AZ 85306 USA.
Website Designed by

Phoenix, Arizona
Time to display page: 0.009 Seconds -- Dynamic Page

Page Views:

free web stats

Stats by StatCounter