I'm thankful for you guys, Jet, Powell, Jim, for spotlighting John Stuart's case. The evolving story begins for us with the scene and many of us have heard and read eyewhitness testimony that corroborates John's version of events. We've seen clear cases of perjury before the grand jury, we've seen that the courts and judges don't follow process but rather seem intent on making it up as they go along.
We believe that John C. Stuart is the only individual in judicial history that is threatened with incarceration for filing papers on his own defense.
This handling of John's competency is utterly unprecendented. There's no precedent for having a second competency determination (after the first found John competent) not to mention a third. I think it's time somebody examined the Judge's medical credentials because he's overruled 3 medical "peers' so far.
Meanwhile, invistigators have continued to re-examine whitnesses, "loose" evidence which could help prove John's innocence in what has become apparent to all of us is a system in which you are guilty until proven lucky, rich or well connected.