Hour 1 - 3
His Latest Video:
Discovery on this lawsuit has not begun but many facts are known from the three other lawsuits: http://tinyurl.com/5wda8gl involving the Pima County Democratic Party and Pima County. The discovery in those cases was limited but nonetheless has shown the path for future discovery that must be followed in this lawsuit.
The goal of this lawsuit is to protect the “purity of elections” in the future, starting with the 2012 elections. At the present time it is easy to cheat using our election computers and impossible to challenge a rigged election. The ease of cheating when matched with the impossibility of challenging any specific election requires court intervention in order to protect the purity of elections and ensure that we will have free elections. Excerpt from statement of facts: http://tinyurl.com/LPFiling
For more information: Rigged NO More: www.RiggedNoMore.com
COURT HEARING 08.13.12 MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL
1. Opening statement Bill Risner
2. Pima County's misleading rebuttal, I've cut in Pima County Attorney Chris Straub (replaced by the pricier private counsel, Ronna Fickbohm). You can decide whether it's taken out of context.
3. Bill Risner rebuttal of Pima County and closing statement.
Link to hot videos on AUDIT-AZ YouTube channel:
A. Attorney Bill Risner Explains How Election Fraud Works in Pima County (Tucson) Arizona. This is the 19 minute version:
B. Short Version: Bill Risner Explaining How Election Fraud Worked In Pima County on the Precinct Memory Cards This is the 6 minute version: http://youtu.be/GhS0Mogy19o
1) Bill Risner Reply to Pima County BOS Opposition to Motion for a new trial filed Aug 6th: we only cheated once argument: http://tinyurl.com/cp928z7
2) LP's Motion for a New Trial filed 07.12.12.pdf: http://tinyurl.com/7m6dbmg ; Hearing set for Aug 13: http://tinyurl.com/7tkzx2l ; Scan able copy of Motion w/o exhibits. pdf: http://tinyurl.com/7bbdrp3
3) June 10, 2012, Arizona Election Fraud: Pima County Superior Court Judge Kyle Bryson Rules in Direct Opposition to the Appellate Courts: http://fatallyflawedelections.blogspot.com/2012/06/arizona-election-fraud-pima-county.html
4) Fraud Flyer with 10 points: http://www.sweetremedy.tv/fatallyflawed/media/RTA_Fraud_Flyer_3_7_12.pdf
5) "V.P." Link to Bill Risner initial disclosure statement which is a mind blowing comprehensive statement of facts collected over many years of investigations and litigation of Pima County: http://tinyurl.com/LPFiling
6) Affidavit Zbig Osmolski about who hack the RTA Election of May 16, 2006: http://electiondefensealliance.org/files/Osmolski_Affidavit.pdf
7) Court of Appeals Memorandum decision of 10.28.10.pdf, after this decision Pima County appealed to AZ Supreme Court and they back Court of Appeals decision: http://tinyurl.com/958s4f4
8) The Ellen Theisen report on the many Significant Discrepancies in the AZ AG office hand count: http://www.votersunite.org/info/SignificantDiscrepanciesInComparisonOfRTAResults.pdf
9) Bill Risner's resolution to State Democratic Party, with backup documents: http://www.velvetrevolution.us/electionstrikeforce/ArizonaDemResolution2010.pdf
10) Summary of the Four Pima County Cases 09/06/10 by Bill Risner updated 7/16/11 by Jim March and John Brakey: http://tinyurl.com/5wda8gl
11) When It Comes To Election Integrity In Arizona There's Nothing Like Having An "Elephant in the Room" Or At Least A "Big Donkey" August 8, 2010:
13) Pima County's Manger "Chuck Huckelberry" created a monster PR Staff, AZ Daily Star: Josh Brodesky: County's new PR force: Good use of tax funds? Sunday, October 9, 2011: http://tinyurl.com/6p5qhtl
14) Maricopa County no better (Phoenix) 4th largest county in USA, "These Points "Interlock" To Make A Complete Election Fraud Recipe":
Voting never brought freedom to anyone
There is concern in the halls of government and the media that the ongoing decline in voter participation reflects apathy. More likely, I think, voters are figuring out how the system really works.
All people act in ways they perceive to be in their best interest. Politics is about trying to convince voters it is in their best interest to vote for candidates who claim to represent their ideals.
Is it working? For the voters best interests?
Libertarian philosophy operates on the belief that most of the American people know that freedom is good for them – including freedom from social and economic engineering imposed on them by swarms of government agents sent to harass them and to eat out their substance.
Since merely voting for more freedom and less government has never produced anything of the sort, it is small wonder that this method is losing credibility and being abandoned by a liberty-starved populace.
I remember that it was the promise of less government that sent Ronald Reagan to the White House with the overwhelming support of the people. The promise of fundamental reforms sent people into the streets in 1992. In 1994 the promise of a contract with the American people, that a new congress would reduce government finally gave both houses to the Republicans.
In every case the American people were lied to, and the voters know it.
What could astute potential voters be told now that would convince them they can make any real difference at the ballot box?
Even putting aside some major concerns: that vote-counting computers are not isolated from outside communication and possible control; that even court-ordered recounts of a computer-tabulated election are not verified with a manual count; that tens of thousands of unvoted ballots are mailed out and never accounted for; that the justification for automation is speed – yet we still wait days and weeks for final results; that legislation prevents simple verification of the computer program with a manual comparison after the election; that many potential voter’s views are not represented on a ballot tailored to provide special advantages to parties that have been institutionalized as part of the government (crippling competition before it gets established); … even with all that aside, we have a populace that instinctively knows that are irrelevant to the process.
As an advocate of freedom, I have found that the political process allows an effective method of spreading the freedom message. For the few short months that people may be paying attention, libertarians have a chance to help them understand new questions that should be asked.
Rather than, “Would local control of public education be preferable?” Ask, “Do you support separation of Child and State?”
Rather than, “Which form of income tax is better?” Ask, “Do you believe the government has a right to your income?”
Instead of, “Should we increase defense funding?” Ask, “Do you believe we would reduce threats to the United States by no longer trying to socially or economically control people around the world?”
Rather than, “How do we provide healthcare for children of the poor?” Ask, “How much less would healthcare cost if the industry were deregulated?”
Instead of, “How do you propose to get handguns out of the hands of
criminals?” Ask, “How do you plan to eliminate victim disarmament laws so
people can protect themselves?”
The issues are influenced by the questions asked – and by exactly how the questions are worded – by the media, the pollsters and the politicians.
This influence is now, however, being steadily displaced as individuals use the
internet to ask their own questions, and seek answers from people who have
Influence of government and traditional media has been dwindling to the point where Libertarians will soon be begged to participate in National Presidential Debates – so someone will watch them!
But by then, the freedom movement will have already taken to the streets with growing numbers of individuals demanding to be left alone, regardless of any vote totals – whether accurate or not.
(This article was written during the 2000 election cycle – To be even more informed and frightened with updated information please put the following words in your web browser: electronic vote fraud diebold blackbox voting – that many words will limit the web sites to 143.)