Hour 3 -- Fredrik Heffermehl (Norwegian Attorney, Past Pres of International Peace Bureau) talks about the Nobel Prize for OPCW and examines both organizations

Hour 1

 

Please note - the first segment of the video archive is not included here (there was a problem uploading the file to Vimeo - will post here when the conversion issues are fixed)

Hour 2

2013-10-25 Hour 2.1 Drew Phillips

(Video Archive):

2013-10-25 Hour 2.1 Drew Phillips from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.

Drew Phillips

Webpage: BitcoinNotBombs.Com

 

Drew provides an update on

Hoodies for the Homeless

Silk Road

Lightcoin

BitcoinFriday2013.com

 

____________________________

 

Help #Hoodie The Homeless Hoodies and T-shirts now on sale and ship early Dec.

The good folks at Mass Appeal Inc, have made us a superb offer on 324 discontinued orange hoodies that they have in stock. We are distributing them to people in need in San Francisco this winter and are offering this lovely design to you to help fund the project.

 

Get a Hoodie or Shirt NOW!

____________________________

 

 

BitcoinFriday2013.com

11/15/2013

One of a kind deals, one day only. We're bringing dozens of merchants together to provide the Black Friday experience to Bitcoin users.

 

 

 

 

 

Webpage: PeaceIsPossible.Info

 

As a Norwegian lawyer, Heffermehl makes the case that the Norwegian politicians entrusted with the Nobel peace awards have brushed aside the legal requirements in Scandinavian estate law using the prize to promote their own political and personal interests instead of the peace ideas Alfred Nobel had in mind. Evaluating each of the 119 Nobel Peace Prizes awarded between 1901 and 2009, the author tracks the ever-widening divergence of the committee's selections from Nobel's intentions and concludes that all but one of the last ten prizes are illegitimate under the law.

Since August 2007 Heffermehl has marked himself as a staunch critic of the Norwegian Nobel Committee, which, according to Heffermehl, has failed to comply with the will of Alfred Nobel,[4] thereby making several awards—45% of the awards after 1945[8]—juridically illegal. Among the laureates perceived by Heffermehl as illegal are the more controversial laureates, such as Henry Kissinger and Le Duc Tho (1973) and Arafat, Peres and Rabin (1994), but also less controversial ones such as Mother Teresa (1979) and Elie Wiesel (1986).[9] Although many laureates have done "commendable work", Heffermehl stresses that this is not good enough to receive a prize whose criteria explicitly pertain to disarmament and peace work.[10]

 

 

 

Kindle Version: