REAL TIME SPOT PRICES
Bitcoin Average: $1185.02
Gold: $1258.47 Change: $4.88
Silver: $18.49 Change: $0.18
Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock
11-06-13 -- Derrick J Freeman - Glenn Jacobs - Harry Dantonio & Marc Stevens (MP3 & VIDEO LOADED)
Derrick J Freeman (Peace News Now) gives an update on the PNN daily podcast - Glenn Jacobs (Citizen X) provides a perspective via world travels - Harry Dantonio, New York State is suspending Dr. Lic. for Taxes... Marc Stevens comments on this :)
Wednesday, November 6, 2013
Time: 124:0 Mins and Secs
Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock - Radio
Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock strives to create an understanding of the Philosophy of Liberty. Understanding is far more important than agreement -- that will come in its own time.
DONATE Bitcoins Here
Click to Subscribe
To RSS Feed:
(Use your browser)
Click to Subscribe
to this program on
Subscribe to Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Archives
DYI App for Android
LRN.FM for Android and iOS!
Time: 124:0 Mins and Secs
Peace News Now
Hour 1 -- Derrick J Freeman (Peace News Now) gives an update on the PNN daily podcast
Hour 2 -- Glenn Jacobs (Citizen X) provides an update on economic issues facing the country
Hour 3 -- Harry Dantonio (New York State vs Freedom) had driver's license suspended for non payment of taxes - Marc Stevens (Adventures in Legal Land) comes on the show to provide some insight to the conversation
CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800
November 6th, 2013
Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock
9 a.m. - Noon (EST)
Studio Line: 602-264-2800
Austrian vs. Keynesian Economics
2013-11-06 Hour 2 Glenn Jacobs
2013-11-06 Hour 2 Glenn Jacobs from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.
Talks about Austrian Economics and provides an update on the economy and predictions for the future
, Harry Dantonio
New York State Republic
, NY State vs Freedom
2013-11-06 Hour 3 Harry Dantonio, Marc Stevens
2013-11-06 Hour 3 Harry Dantonio, Marc Stevens from Ernest Hancock on Vimeo.
Marc Stevens (Adventures in Legal Land) comes on the show to provide some insight to the conversation (3rd and 4th Segment)
Activist - New York State Republic- The Future Is In The Past (website not up yet)
90's Activist, Founding Member NYC Freedom Foundation
Radio Show: "The Quickening Hour" w/Media bypass Mag. (RIP)
Redemption and Alternative Law advocate and researcher
Musician,Songwriter, Artist, DJ,
Founding Musician of Punk Rock in NYC 1972 at CBGB's
Presently Setting up 'New York State Republic' Website. We need input from ALL Statesas to how a "perfect" state would operate where treason against The People's Freedom, Liberty and Constitution would not be tolerated! All under the label of"Education" to learn how our Republic once operated.
We will concentrate on helping each other gather a large body against the divide and conquer mentality that has been so successful to date in New York and all other STATES
I have been looking to our alternative movement for help with little or no response to such a big issue.
As I do not want to give them the chance to give me more abuse,I have temporarily stopped traveling until I have an Expat ID if one exists!
ALL of my timely responses and letters went ignored, unanswered or responded to with unsigned or scribbled computer generated documents. I had begged, then demanded they sign all responses clearly under penalty of perjury. I then Recieved an Unsigned Warrant, an unsigned notice of the pending
suspension and finally from a party I see absolutely NO joinder with....The DMV (Dept of motor vehicles ). The notice of Suspension as of 10/25/13....of course Unsigned!
I am calling on all of the American people to join in a class action suit against all state tax agencies who are actually joining up against us with our own money!!!! and to force them out of the Travel business and back into Commercial Activity where they belong...if we allow.
When will you not be able to buy an Ice Cream cone if you did not pay illegal taxes? ...probably soon.
Here is some of Section 510 it is very long
I have included what seems most important
the whole section is here:
S 510. Suspension, revocation and reissuance of
registrations. 1. Who may suspend or revoke. Any magistrate,
judge, in a city, in a town, or in a village, any supreme court justice,
any county judge, any judge of a district court, the
state police and the commissioner of motor
vehicles or any person
deputized by him, shall have power to revoke or suspend the
drive a motor vehicle or motorcycle of any person, or in the case
owner, the registration, as provided herein
4-f. Suspension for failure to pay past-due tax liabilities.
commissioner shall enter into a written agreement with the
of taxation and finance,
as provided in section one hundred
seventy-one-v of the tax law, which shall set forth the
suspending the drivers' licenses of
individuals who have failed to
satisfy past-due tax liabilities as such terms
are defined in such
(2) Upon receipt of notification from the
department of taxation and
finance that an individual has
failed to satisfy past-due tax
liabilities, or to otherwise make payment arrangements
the commissioner of taxation and finance, or has failed to
the terms of such payment arrangements more than once
within a twelve
month period, the commissioner or his or her agent
shall suspend the
license of such person to operate a motor
vehicle. In the event such
person is unlicensed, such person's privilege of
obtaining a license
shall be suspended. Such suspension shall
take effect no later than
fifteen days from the date of the notice thereof provided to the
whose license or privilege of obtaining a license is
to be suspended,
and shall remain in effect until such time
as the commissioner is
advised that the person has
satisfied his or her past-due tax
liabilities, or has otherwise made payment arrangements
the commissioner of taxation and finance.
(3) From the time the commissioner is
notified by the department of
taxation and finance under this section, the
commissioner shall be
relieved from all liability to such person which
may otherwise arise
under this section, and such person shall have no right to
court action or proceeding or to any other legal
recourse against the
commissioner to recover such driving privileges as
authorized by this
section. In addition, notwithstanding any other provision of
person shall have no right to a hearing or
appeal pursuant to this
chapter with respect to a suspension of driving privileges as authorized
by this section.
(4) Notwithstanding any provision
of law to the contrary, the
department shall furnish the department of taxation and finance with the
information necessary for the proper identification of
referred to the department for
the purpose of driver's license
suspension pursuant to this
section and section one hundred
seventy-one-v of the tax law. This shall include the individual's
social security number and any other information the
motor vehicles deems necessary.
(5) Any person whose driver's
license is suspended pursuant to
paragraph two of this subdivision may apply for
the issuance of a
restricted use license as provided in section
five hundred thirty of
5. Restoration. A license or registration may be restored by
of the commissioner but not otherwise. Reversal
on appeal, of any
conviction because of which any license or registration has been revoked
or suspended, shall entitle the holder to restoration thereof forthwith.
The privileges of a non-resident may be restored
by direction of the
commissioner in his discretion but not otherwise.
6. Restrictions. a. Where revocation is mandatory
hereunder, no new
license shall be issued for at least six months or, in
certain cases a
longer period as specified in this chapter, nor thereafter,
the discretion of the commissioner of motor vehicles.
b. Except as otherwise provided in
paragraph c of this subdivision,
where revocation is mandatory pursuant
to subparagraph (iii) of
paragraph a of subdivision two of
this section, no new commercial
driver's license shall be issued for at least one year
except in the discretion of the commissioner, except that if such person
has previously been found to have refused a chemical
test pursuant to
section eleven hundred ninety-four of this
chapter or has a prior
conviction of any of the following offenses: any
violation of section
eleven hundred ninety-two of this chapter; any violation of
one or two of section six
hundred of this chapter; or has a prior
conviction of any felony involving the use of a motor
to paragraph (a) of subdivision one of section
five hundred ten-a of
this article, then such commercial driver's license revocation
c. Where revocation is mandatory
pursuant to subdivision one of
section five hundred ten-a of this chapter or
subparagraph (iii) of
paragraph a of subdivision two of this
section and the violation of
subdivision two of section six hundred of this chapter
while operating a commercial motor
vehicle transporting hazardous
materials, no new commercial driver's license shall be
issued for at
least three years nor thereafter
except in the discretion of the
commissioner, except that if such person has previously been
have refused a chemical test
pursuant to section eleven hundred
ninety-four of this chapter or has a prior conviction
of any of the
following offenses: any violation of section eleven hundred
of this chapter; any violation of subdivision one or two of
hundred of this chapter; or has
a prior conviction of any felony
involving the use of a motor vehicle pursuant
to paragraph (a) of
subdivision one of section five hundred ten-a of this article, then such
commercial driver's license revocation shall be permanent.
|If they come a
and ask'in lots of questions...
the gov'mint comes a knock'in and they're ask'in lots of questions, about you
or people you know, consider this statement told to me year's ago..."When you
go to them with a problem, they may be your friend, but when they come to talk
to you, they are NEVER your friend. Be leary of them."
information below as a public service message. Stand up and ask some
|Good input from a lawyer
friend, about the questionnaire... "There's nothing wrong with asking those questions, but
there's no requirement in the law that they all be answered. I don't think you
could ever require a public servant disclose his or her residence address when
acting within the scope of their job. Office address, yes.""It is kind of meaningless to ask them if they will
uphold the Constitution, since even if they answer "yes," whether they are
acting within the Constitution is a legal question for a court to ultimately
decide if the agent's conduct becomes an issue. They took an oath of office
already, and that oath requires them to support and defend the Constitution.
They're not going to say, "no." And if they do violate their oath, the signed
questionnaire answer will be superfluous." Questions as to whether cooperation is voluntary or
mandatory, and consequences for not answering, are good ones. I suspect few
agents will give you a direct answer unless they know they can charge you for
obstruction of justice, etc. If you really don't want to talk, it makes sense
to ask whether the agent thinks you must talk, or else.""You really can't require agents to disclose third
parties, and information they've obtained from them, as a general matter. Think
about a criminal investigation. You can't have a witnesses' testimony tainted
by telling them what another witness saw or heard, for example." Of course, no public servant is going to sign such a
questionnaire. But as a general matter, it wouldn't hurt to have the list handy
to ask some of the questions orally. If the agent refuses to answer the
important ones, then my attitude could well be less cooperative than if they
were forthcoming with me."|
| THE PUBLIC SERVANT
by Daniel J. Schultz.
| Key Points
An American does not have to speak with a government agent
unless the citizen has been arrested.
Americans have a right to privacy, to be left alone.
The PRIVACY ACT OF 1974 (Public Law 93-579), empowers
citizens to require full, written disclosure from a government official who
You may insist on complete disclosure as a precondition to
speaking with any government official.
|The Limits On Federal
Law-abiding citizens are sometimes visited by agents of
the Federal government for no apparent reason. It is helpful, at the time of
these visits, to recall that unless a citizen has been placed under arrest
(either because a law enforcement officer has probable cause to believe the
citizen has committed a crime or because the officer has in his possession an
arrest warrant issued by a judge who believes there is probable cause the
citizen has committed a crime, a citizen does not have to entertain the company
of government agents.
Citizens also have the right, guaranteed by the Fifth
Amendment to the United States Constitution, not to testify against themselves.
Thus, when "the government" comes knocking on one's door, you have the right to
simply say, "Please go away." Unless the government officer places you under
arrest (there must be probable cause, or an arrest warrant based on probable
cause), the officer must obey your wishes.
|Be Helpful.... On Your
Of course, citizens also have a vested interest in
assisting "the government" in its role of crime-solver. Most of us understand
the need to help "the government" to apprehend criminals. But it is also
helpful, when "the government" arrives at your place of employment or at your
home, to know how to find out why government agents have appeared on YOUR
A handy little questionnaire that I came across years ago
will do the trick. It's called the "Public Servant Questionnaire." A version
accompanies this article. The "PSQ" was developed by Lynn Johnston, author of
Who's Afraid of the IRS? (Libertarian Review Foundation: 1983, ISBN
The PSQ is based on the requirements placed upon the
government by the Privacy Act of 1974 (Public Law 93-579), an amending law to
Title 5, United States Code, Section 552, and is included as Section 552a.
If a citizen chooses to cooperate with government officials
who are seeking information, BEFORE questioning begins, the citizen should
politely inform the government agent or agents that a prerequisite for the
citizen's cooperation with "the government" is the agent's cooperation with the
|Do It Right, The First
The questions should then be put to each agent, and the
citizen should enter the answers onto the questionnaire. Copies should be
provided to each agent, either at the time of the questioning or by mail to the
agent after the visit. The questionnaire informs the government agent that the
citizen knows his rights and knows which limited powers the government agent
has been granted by the people.
Most probably some government agents will not want to fill
out or sign the PSQ. That's fine. They can then be sent on their merry way.
They may need to explain to their superiors, and a court of law, and a jury, on
another day, why they refused to cooperate with the reasonable questions of the
highest officeholder in the land, a citizen.
Public Law 93-579 states in part: "The purpose of this Act is
to provide certain safeguards for an individual against invasion of personal
privacy requiring Federal agencies... to permit an individual to determine what
records pertaining to him are collected, maintained, used or disseminated by
The following questions are based upon that act and are
necessary for this individual to make a reasonable determination concerning
divulgence of information to this agency.
Name of public servant:
___________________________________ State _________ Zip __________
Name of department of government, bureau, or agency by which
public servant is employed:
____________________________________________________ Supervisor's name:
____________________________________ State _________ Zip __________
Will public servant uphold the Constitution of the United
States of America? Yes ______ No ______
Did public servant furnish proof of identity? Yes ______ No
What was the nature of proof?
ID No. _____________________
Badge No. _____________________ Driver's License No. _____________________
Will public servant furnish a copy of the law or regulation
which authorizes this investigation? Yes ______ No ______
Will the public servant read aloud that portion of the law
authorizing the questions he will ask? Yes ______ No ______
Are the citizen's answers voluntary? ______ Or Mandatory?
Are the questions to be asked based upon a specific law or
or are they being used as a discovery process?
What other uses may be made of this
What other agencies may have access to this information?
What will be the effect upon me if I should choose to not
answer any part of these questions?
Name of person in government requesting that this
investigation be made? __________________________________________
Is this investigation "general?" ______ or is it "special?"
Note: By "general" is meant any kind of blanket investigation in
which a number of persons are involved because of geography, type of business,
sex, religion, race, schooling, income, etc. By "special" is meant any
investigation of an individual nature in which others are not involved.
Have you consulted, questioned, interviewed, or received
information from any third party relative to this investigation?
If yes, the identity of all such third
Do you reasonably anticipate either a civil or criminal
action to be initiated or pursued based upon any of the information which you
seek? Yes ______ No ______
Is there a file of records, information, or correspondence
relating to me being maintained by this agency? Yes ______ No ______
Is this agency using any information pertaining to me which
was supplied by another agency or government source? Yes______ No ______ If
yes, which agencies and/or sources?
Will the public servant guarantee that the information in
these files will not be used by any other department other than the one by whom
he is employed? Yes ______ No ______
|AFFIRMATION BY PUBLIC
I, __________________________________________________, swear
(or affirm) that the answers I have given to the foregoing questions are
complete and correct in every
(Must be signed & dated in ink. This signature should be
witnessed by two people, if possible. Citizen may administer an oath if he or
she so desires.)
Daniel J. Schultz. Daniel is a graduate of the United
States Military Academy at West Point, New York and a practicing attorney in
Los Angeles, California. He is the President, and a co-founding member of The Lawyer's Second Amendment Society (LSAS), a nationwide
network of pro-right to keep and bear arms attorneys. Inquiries to the LSAS may
be made to 818-734-3066 or by writing to the LSAS, 18034 Ventura Blvd, No. 329,
Encino, CA 91316. The email address for the LSAS is: LSAS3@aol.com
Unlawful Predatory Lien:
Join us on our
Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network:
Additional related items you might find interesting:
|Tags: derrick, jacobs, dantonio