Article Image
Radio/TV • Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock
Program Date:

08-07-19 - Paul Rosenberg - Dr Judy Mikovits, PhD (MP3s/VIDEO's LOADED)

Paul Rosenberg (Freeman's Perspective) on his latest Parallel Society Newsletter on 'Civilizational Change at the Personal Level' - Dr Judy Mikovits (PhD, Molecular Biology) on her fight and focus to stop vaccine mandates; corruption in the vaccine i
Media Type: Audio • Time: 169 Minutes and 0 Secs
Guests: Ernest Hancock, ,
Media Type: Audio • Time: 57 Minutes and 00 Secs
Guests: Paul Rosenberg, ,
Media Type: Audio • Time: 49 Minutes and 34 Secs
Topics: Vaccines

Hour 1 - 3

Media Type: Audio • Time: 169 Minutes and 0 Secs
Guests: Ernest Hancock, ,

Broadcast Date: August 7th, 2019

Live Streaming Broadcast of the show can be viewed here:




Archived Videos:

YouTube.Com - Ernest Hancock


Freedom's Phoenix -

Pirates without Borders -

The Corbett Report -


Hour 1 - Host Ernest Hancock goes over the headline and top tech news on Freedom's Phoenix...

Hour 2 - Paul Rosenberg (Freeman's Perspective) on his latest Parallel Society Newsletter on Civilizational Change at the Personal Level

Hour 3 - Dr Judy Mikovits (PhD, Molecular Biology) on her fight and focus to stop vaccine mandates; corruption in the vaccine industry, The Disturbing Increase in Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults, Scientific Fraud of FDA's Vaccine Licensure, Vaccine Education Summit

CALL IN TO SHOW: 602-264-2800


Letters of Marque Paperback


Letters of Marque Paperback – September 25, 2018

by Marque dePlume (Author)

"The Crown calls it 'piracy' to explore frontiers beyond its grasp. So the time has come to define the conduct among pirates." Captain Marque

Join us 'Above the Grid'




Hour 1

Video of Show:

Ernest Hancock

Host Ernest Hancock goes over the headline and top tech news on Freedom's Phoenix

Hour 2

Media Type: Audio • Time: 57 Minutes and 00 Secs
Guests: Paul Rosenberg, ,

Hour 2 - Paul Rosenberg comes on the show to discuss the re-naming of his subscriber-based newsletter to Parallel Society, providing a more outward focus and his hope for the future...Paul discusses his latest issue: Civilizational Change at the Personal Level


Letters of Marque Paperback


Letters of Marque Paperback – September 25, 2018

by Marque dePlume (Author)

"The Crown calls it 'piracy' to explore frontiers beyond its grasp. So the time has come to define the conduct among pirates." Captain Marque

Join us 'Above the Grid'




Hour 2

Video of Show:

Paul Rosenberg

Freeman's Perspective


Paul Rosenberg knows a lot about a lot of things. A lifestyle capitalist with a broad range of interests and experiences under his belt, current passions include philosophy, theology, history, psychology, and physics. This diverse interest base is reflected in his extensive repertoire of published titles, including A Lodging of Wayfaring MenThe Words of the Founders, and Production Versus Plunder, not to mention 55 engineering and construction books.

Prior to this, his highly successful engineering career saw him called as an expert witness in numerous legal cases and recruited as a consultant to a number of high profile organizations, such as NASA and the US military. He developed and taught 19 continuing education courses for Iowa State University's College of Engineering. He also co-founded the Fiber Optic Association and wrote the first ever standard for the installation of fiber optic cables.

Paul Rosenberg has been featured on or at:

Project To Restore America

Casey Research

Zero Hedge



The Daily Paul

Early to Rise

Story Leak

Expat World

International Man

The Burning Platform

Global Wealth Protection

Freedom Fest


Freedom's Phoenix


Paul's previous interviews on the Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Radio Show:


Paul comes on the show to discuss the re-naming of his subscriber-based newsletter to Parallel Society, providing a more outward focus and his hope for the future...Paul discusses his latest issue: Civilizational Change at the Personal Level

Hour 3

Media Type: Audio • Time: 49 Minutes and 34 Secs
Topics: Vaccines

Hour 3 - Dr Judy Mikovits (PhD, Molecular Biology) on her fight and focus to stop vaccine mandates; corruption in the vaccine industry, The Disturbing Increase in Colorectal Cancer in Young Adults, Scientific Fraud of FDA's Vaccine Licensure, Vaccine Education Summit


Letters of Marque Paperback


Letters of Marque Paperback – September 25, 2018

by Marque dePlume (Author)

"The Crown calls it 'piracy' to explore frontiers beyond its grasp. So the time has come to define the conduct among pirates." Captain Marque

Join us 'Above the Grid'


Hour 3

Video of Show:

Dr. Judy Mikovits, PhD

To contact Judy:



Judy testified on a lawsuit for Racketeering and conspiracy against the CA legislators who passed the SB277 mandating toxins be inoculated in their children under the guise of vaccination and she will re-cap her testimony...




Other references and webpages:

Judy's previous interviews on the Declare Your Independence with Ernest Hancock Radio Show:

Judy A. Mikovits, PhD has spent her life training to be a research scientist to honor her grandfather who died of cancer when she was a teenager. Dr. Mikovits earned her BA from University of Virginia and PhD in Biochemistry and Molecular Biology from George Washington University. In her 35-year quest to understand and treat chronic diseases, she has studied immunology, natural products chemistry, epigenetics, virology and drug development. In just over twenty years she rose from an entry-level lab technician to become director of the lab of Antiviral Drug Mechanisms at the National Cancer Institute before leaving to direct the Cancer Biology program at EpiGenX Pharmaceuticals in Santa Barbara, California where she had met and married David Nolde in 2000. There in 2006, she became attracted to the plight of patients with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome and Autism. In only five years she developed the first neuroimmune institute from a concept to a reality and is primarily responsible for demonstrating the relationship between immune based inflammation and these diseases. She has published over 50 scientific papers.

Dr. Judy A. Mikovits recently founded MAR Consulting Inc. with her collaborator Dr. Frank Ruscetti. 



Vaccine Education Summit Sat Sept 28th, 2019, 8-5 pm @ Sheraton Crescent PHX - Advanced Ticket Sales

 Vaccine Education Summit 2019 brought to you by "Arizona Coalition for Medical Freedom" & "Freedom's Phoenix". More information will be updated at, but you can go there now to see all the awesome speakers from the previous summit (2016)...

Join us to hear from those in the science, medical and legal communities as they speak on the topic of vaccines.

Advanced ticket sales - $100 Each (ticket includes Vaccine Education Summit plus Lunch).



Date And Time

Sat, September 28, 2019; 8:00 AM – 5:00 PM MST


Sheraton Phoenix Crescent - 2620 West Dunlap Avenue;  Phoenix, AZ 85021

Confirmed Speakers:

Dr Judy A Mikovits, PhD (Molecular Biology) - Researcher; Author; Advocate for Health Education and Freedom. Webpage:

James Lyons-Weiler - CEO and President at Institute for Pure and Applied Knowledge. Other Webpage: 

Kevin Barry (President of First Freedoms - Freedom of Health Choice)




Dr Judy's upcoming book (to be release November 5th, 2019) can be pre-ordered on Amazon (




2.  Paul Offit Unwittingly Exposes Scientific Fraud of FDA's Vaccine Licensure

July 31, 2019

By Jeremy R. Hammond, Contributing Writer, Children's Health Defense 

By telling parents not to do antibody blood tests to avoid needlessly vaccinating their child, Paul Offit unwittingly exposes scientific fraud by the FDA.

Many parents today are naturally concerned about the number of vaccine doses their children are exposed to by following the schedule recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). To many parents, it makes sense to avoid vaccinating their children unnecessarily, and to this end a blood test can be done to determine an antibody titer, or the level of antibodies in the blood. If a child already has a protective antibody titer, indicating immunity to a given infectious disease, then there would be no reason for the child to undergo the risks associated with vaccinating against that disease.

To persuade parents that this is wrong thinking, the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) has published a video in which Dr. Paul Offit argues that such blood tests are of little practical use, and that the best thing for parents to do is just to get their children all of the vaccinations strictly according to the CDC's schedule.

Offit's argument, however, is fallacious.

Moreover, the nature of his argument reveals how advocates of existing public vaccine policy rely on deception in order to persuade the public to comply with the wishes of the bureaucrats and technocrats who determine that policy.

In fact, properly understood in its context, Offit's argument undercuts the case for public vaccine policy inasmuch as it highlights how, in order to get vaccine products to the market, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) colludes with the pharmaceutical industry in what is arguably scientific fraud.

… just because someone doesn't have a protective level of antibodies doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't immune.

Offit's Argument

In the video, Paul Offit introduces himself as coming from the so-called "Vaccine Education Center" at the CHOP. Then he acknowledges parents' concern about unnecessary vaccinations:

One thing that parents worry about, or wonder about is, do I really need a vaccine if I've already had one or two doses? Do I really need to finish out the schedule, for example? Or maybe I've already been exposed to a virus or bacteria, so I don't really need to even get vaccines at all.

So instead, how about if I just have my blood tested to see whether or not I have a protective immune response already against that particular virus or bacteria.

But, Offit argues, this is "not as easily done as you would think" because antibody titers are not necessarily indicative of immunity.

He names the hepatitis B virus and the Haemohilus influenzae type B bacterium as examples of pathogens for which a certain quantity of antibodies in the blood is equivalent to immunity.

This is not the case, however, for other pathogens, including the measles virus; rotavirus; and the pertussis bacterium, which causes whooping cough.

With measles, having a certain antibody titer does correlate with immunity, but a lack of antibodies isn't necessarily indicative of a lack of immunity. In Offit's words (bold emphasis added):

However, there was an outbreak of measles in the late 1980s, early 1990s that swept through the United States that caused more than 50,000 hospitalizations and caused about 120, children mostly, to die from measles.

When people looked back at that outbreak, you found that there were many people who had been vaccinated, but who didn't have antibodies against measles who were still protected. The reason they were still protected is they had something called memory cells. Memory immunological cells, like B- and T-cells, which then when they were exposed to the virus became activated, differentiated, made antibodies, which then protected them. So even though they didn't have circulating antibodies in their bloodstream, they still have these memory cells in their immune system that could then respond when they were exposed. So, if you looked at those people and saw they didn't have antibodies, you would have falsely concluded they weren't protected when they were.

In short, just because someone doesn't have a protective level of antibodies doesn't necessarily mean that they aren't immune. One can still be immune to a disease due to what is known as cell-mediated immunity, which is a different branch of the immune system from humoral, or antibody, immunity.

Conversely, Offit continues (bold emphasis added):

Sometimes you can have antibodies in your bloodstream and not be protected.

So, for example rotavirus or pertussis bacteria affect really just the mucosal surfaces. So, rotaviruses just infect the lining of the small intestine. Pertussis or whooping cough infects sort of the lining of the trachea or windpipe and the lungs. That virus and that bacteria don't really spread into the bloodstream and cause a systemic infection. They're so-called mucosal infections. So when you look at immunity in the bloodstream, that doesn't necessarily predict whether or not there's going to be adequate immunity at that mucosal surface.

In short, just because someone has a high antibody titer doesn't mean that they are immune. Cell-mediated immunity and mucosal immunity—or both—may also—or instead—be required to provide adequate protection against disease.

Offit summarizes by saying that "titers are difficult" and "not a perfect predictor" of immunity, concluding that "the best way of knowing that you're protected is to get the vaccines that are recommended at the time they are recommended."

Thus, Offit dismisses the idea of trying to avoid vaccination with a blood test as practically useless while characterizing vaccination as the best guarantee of immunity.

CLICK HERE for the rest of the article


3.  Elijah Cummings and Trump: The Tentacles of the Pharma Deep State…

By Kent Heckenlively, JD

Recently President Trump attacked Congressman Elijah Cummings over the condition of the city of Baltimore, which Cummings represents.

Trump's tweet from July 27, 2019 read:

"Rep, Elijah Cummings has been a brutal bully, shouting and screaming at the great men & women of Border Patrol about conditions at the Southern Border, when actually his Baltimore district is FAR WORSE and more dangerous. His district is considered the Worst in the USA . . . As proven last week during a Congressional tour, the Border is clean, efficient & well run, just very crowded. Cummings District is a disgusting, rat and rodent infested mess. If he spent more time in Baltimore, maybe he could help clean up this very dangerous & filthy place."

Video Player

Of course, the news media has exploded in condemnation, calling Trump a racist for the millionth time, even though Trump also added Nancy Pelosi's San Francisco to the list of poorly run Democratic cities.

However, this wasn't the first time I'd run across Congressman Elijah Cummings.  In my book, INOCULATED: How Sciences Lost its Soul in Autism I recounted the story told to me by Minister Tony Muhammad of the Nation of Islam.

The "Inoculated" book dealt with the revelations of Dr. William Thompson, a senior CDC (Center for Disease Control) scientist, who revealed the agency had covered up a link between earlier administration of the MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine and the development of autism in African-American boys.  (The effect was pronounced in ALL groups, but especially strong among African-American males.)

Cummings Come-Uppance…

Here's a brief section from the INOCULATED: How Sciences Lost its Soul in Autism book (published in 2016) about Congressman Elijah Cummings, and how powerful forces prevented him from doing his job, even when the matter was harming his own constituents.

Minister Muhammad had recently been instrumental in setting up a meeting between Robert Kennedy, Jr., Dr. Brian Hooker, and Minister Farrakhan to discuss the allegations of great harm being done to the African-American community by vaccines and determining if a common plan of action could be created.

After the meeting, Minister Farrakhan discussed the issue with Tony Muhammad and suggested he call up his old friend, Elijah Cummings, the powerful African-American Congressman from Baltimore, Maryland and ranking member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which had authority over the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (CDC)

Tony made the call and Cummings was happy to hear from him and asked how he could help.  Tony told the congressman about the Thompson situation, what it meant specifically to black children, and asked for his help.

"Brother, we just had some of those CDC people up here and I kinda felt like they was lying to us," said Congressman Cummings.  "I'm gonna look into this.  I give you my word, Brother Mohammed."

Three days later, Congressman Cummings called back.  "Brother Mohammed?" he said.

"Yes sir?" replied Minister Tony.

"Look, I'm for vaccines, man.  And I don't think I can deal with this."

Minister Tony immediately felt his blood pressure rise.  "Wait a minute.  I didn't tell you to be against vaccines, sir.  That's not what we talked about.  Good, I want you to be for vaccines.  But don't you want them to be safe?"

"Look, we dealt with this.  That man has been debunked."

"Who's been debunked?"

"Dr. William Thompson," declared Congressman Cummings.

"No, he hasn't!  He hasn't spoke to nobody.  He wants to be subpoenaed by you!  Elijah, what happened?"

"I'm for vaccines and I'm not going to deal with this issue.  I don't mean you no harm.  You just have to tell the Minister that I'm not dealing with this."

Tony knew his anger was being felt on the other end of the line.  "You sure?  You sure you want me to tell THAT to the Minister?"

The next thing Tony heard was the sound of Congressman Elijah Cummings, his old friend, hanging up on him.

Minister Tony immediately contacted Minister Farrakhan and told him what had happened.  Farrakhan was disappointed, but not surprised.  "There's no telling what they've got on him.  This is what they do to our black politicians and our black leaders who can't see they're being used.  They invite many of them to high-level parties, get them into these compromising positions, whether it's drugs or infidelity, get all kinds of data and information, and use it against them.  Or they give them so much money, and record that, so if they ever turn on them, they can threaten them with exposing it."

Both of them knew that the FBI had done the same thing with Martin Luther King, Jr., tape-recording his infidelities with other women, then sending the recordings to his wife, Coretta, and even going so far as sending him a letter telling King that he should kill himself.  King hadn't let himself be bullied by the FBI, but he was the rare black leader who didn't succumb to the intimidation.

Farrakhan's remarks became a little more philosophical, believing that justice would eventually arrive.  "This act is so criminal.  When the American people find out the truth about what's going on at the CDC, I feel sorry for all the white and black politicians.  Brother, you are dealing with people's children.  You ain't seen Caucasians get angry.  They will go into the statehouses, grab these politicians, tie them to the back of a truck, and drag them down the street.  The American people are at a boiling point.  They'd better tell the truth while they have a chance.  Because if the truth comes out in any other way, it could tear up this country.  This truly is something that could tear up this country."

Minister Tony Muhammad felt he finally understood the enormity of this problem and the power of the pharmaceutical industry.  He'd known Congressman Cummings for decades, considered him a friend and a fellow warrior for African-Americans, and they'd turned his head around in the space of a few days.  This really was a fight against the dragon.  This was a monstrous evil and it was harming children on a daily basis.  Was there ever a more worthy fight than defending the babies?

The experience with Congressman Cummings is reflective…

…of what many of our activists have found when they've tried to engage members of congress.  Congressman Jason Chaffetz, a powerful Republican congressman was extensively briefed on the Thompson situation, promised to bring Thompson before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, then resigned a few months later to become a contributor on Fox News.  Every time I see Chaffetz on television I want to throw a shoe at the screen.

The swamp has deep tentacles from pharma and needs good people of both parties who are courageously willing to fight it.

By Kent Heckenlively, JD


4.  Analysis – The GOOD And The BAD of Today's "Anti-Vax" Movement…

Despite Well Funded Constant Assaults By Big Pharma, And Their Sleazy Minions,  The Worldwide "Anti-Vax" Movement Gets Smarter, Tougher, And Stronger – And Far More Knowledgeable, And Sophisticated, EVERY Day...

Opinion by "Deplorable" Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

There are ONLY three viewpoints about the Vaccine Programs on Planet Earth…

 (1)  The huge, and ever growing, "Anti-Vax" Movement – is made up of people who think about things and make up their minds about issues based on facts and reality.  They are people who have done their homework.  They are people who look their Pediatrician, or their politician, in the eye and say "YOU are beginning to piss me off, buster…"  They sound, and act, like angry Americans.

(2)  The "Pro-Vax" Mercenaries – Those who's very financial existence depends upon them promoting the great vaccine lie:   like Pediatricians,  "Public Health" workers, and "Astro-Turf" organizations. 

These are people that connect themselves to the "Progressive" wing of the Democratic Party.  They are very often government employees who have no morality what-so-ever.  They are almost never family members. Few, if any, have children of their own.  Secular Humanism will be their guidance mechanism.  Several of their leaders have  recently been connected to child pornography.  Some of those are people who get government, or Big Pharma Grants, to argue the pro-vax position.

(3)  The biggest group – Normal, non-involved people who mistakenly believe that their government, their "Public Health," and their scientific/academic community have their best interests at heart. 

These are the people who, almost suddenly, become part of the "Anti-Vax" Community after their beloved child gets a nine vaccine combo from their white-coated-Mercedes-driving Pediatrician.  Their beloved child turns into a screaming, high-fevered, clearly suffering, defenseless little one who will, from that pediatric moment on,  need constant 24 hour-per-day care.

It is a simple situation…

It is the classic battle between Good and Evil.

What Has Changed To Make The "Anti-Vax" Movement So Powerful?

It was one simple thing – a change in "positioning."  Prior to the passing of SB 277 in California (Mandatory Vaccines for children) the movement that was then called "Autism," had the attitude that they should plead their case POLITELY to the very people that were causing the problem to start with. "Autism" leadership, at the time, BLOCKED anyone from pointing out that vaccines were dangerous.  Their agreed upon  "positioning" was:

"We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)…

California was a battleground – and not just over the SB 277 legislation.  Internally, what was becoming the "Anti-Vax" Movement was involved in humongous infighting.  A huge counter movement, within the "Autism" world, was telling those that insisted that their argument "We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)… was a non-starter.

A huge fight ensued between the "personal choice" contingent and the "vaccines are neither safe nor effective" activists.  We lost the SB 277 fight,  but the "personal choice" people were forced out of a leadership role.

Once the "vaccines are neither safe nor effective" partisans began to punch their way through the "Autism" structure, everything changed.  Now there was a "positioning" that made sense, and provided  a common banner,  From there, from that point, an easily usable strategy began to unfold.  The whole movement dropped the "Autism" movement designation and went full-on "Anti-Vax."

And THAT was the Good part…

All across America "Anti-Vax" activists dropped the polite obsequious (whimpering) approach and not only went nose-to nose with their former detractors, like the internet trolls, and the Paul Offits of the world, but they battered those former tormentors, like "Orac," into the internet equivalent of "road kill."    The organized "skeptics" became a common "chew toy" for angered "Anti-Vax" operators.  The "Anti-Vax" activists had found out how to make activism fun.

With the newer, and better message, "Anti-Vax" stuff began to happen at every level.  So much so that Big Pharma, in desperation contacted the World Health Organization (WHO) for help against us.  Then they (laugh here) got Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff to write a letter to Google, FaceBook, etc., trying to block our ability to communicate,

At that point Big Pharma was ADMITTING that the "Anti-Vax" Movement was, and is, ALL POWERFUL. (stand up and pound your chest…)

Now – Over To The BAD Part…

The "position" switch from "We know that vaccines are safe and effective (sniff, sniff), but we just want personal choice (whimper, whimper)… to the new "vaccines are neither safe nor effective" argument was EVERYTHING. 

It enabled, literally, millions of activists to turn loose their anger and frustration over the vaccine issue – and it worked – scaring Big Pharma, and their minions into desperate action.

So, what is so bad about that?

The massive movement STOPPED at that point, and did not move up to the next logical step – the realization that the "vaccines" themselves were NOT the problem.

Too many "Anti-Vax" activists focused only on the problems of the vaccines themselves.  They did not, and do not, realize that there is more to this argument than just those little "Made-in-China" scum tubes.  The fact is that the vaccines, themselves, are the MINOR part of the problem. We are NOT going to solve "the vaccine issue" without acknowledging the bigger problems, and dealing with them.

What is "the bigger problem?"  Vaccines are NOT the problem.  The REAL problem is those groups of people, and entities, who are constantly coming at all of us with a loaded syringe in their hands.

Let me use an analogy here – suppose we were in a literal war situation where the enemy is shooting bullets (vaccines) at us, and we are hiding behind a protective wall.  We are NOT going to win this conflict by avoiding bullets (vaccines).  Sooner, than later, the enemy will win.  We have to do something about those people shooting those bullets (vaccines) at us.

Now in a real war, we would have some counter options.  We could activate our mortar teams, lobbing mini-bombs (mortar rounds) into the shooters positions.  Or, we could call in for an artillery barrage, pinpointing the enemy's position.  If we can identify their Command Post location, even better.

The whole idea is to stop the enemy from continuing their aggressive behavior  by sending bullets (vaccines) our way.  When you think of the problem in those terms solutions almost provide for themselves.  If you want to win the war you have to kill those shooting at you, destroy their Command Posts, destroy their supply lines, and start bombing their capital cities.  THEN you start to get their attention.

So, who are these people shooting bullets (vaccines) our way?

That's an easy answer…

There are three groups – easy to identify, and even easier to strategize against.

 Let's look at them:

(1)  The vaccine manufacturers are a very profitable arm of Big Pharma.  As we know, even from the liberal news, Big Pharma constantly violates the law, and our government constantly fines then for their actions.  Attorney groups, except for vaccines, constantly sue Big Pharma to stop their evil ways.  Why do I mention these facts?  Because I want to emphasize that these people are not out of reach. In fact, they are VERY vulnerable to the right kind of attack.

(2)  US Public Health – The original intent of "Public Health" is to act as a structure for the public good.  It is made up of an arrangement between Federal, State and Local agencies.  Although it is sort of a "Communism 101″ solution, there COULD BE some good in it – if it were tightly  controlled.

But, "Public Health"  is NOT tightly controlled, at least not by "We the People." They, virtually, operate on their own – and their funding comes directly, and indirectly, from Big Pharma.  Guess what THAT leads to…

The Public Law & Health Center says of them:

"The public health system in the U.S. is a complex network of people and organizations in both public and private sectors that collaborate in various ways at national, state and local levels to promote and protect public health.

The governmental public health system is made up of public health agencies from the federal government, 51 states (including the District of Columbia), 2,794 local governments, and 565 federally recognized tribal agencies.7
Because of the broad flexibility states have in defining their public health role, the governmental public health infrastructure throughout the U.S. is extremely varied."

"Both state and local health departments serve critical roles in promoting and protecting the health of residents in their jurisdictions. State health departments provide many population-based public health services related to primary prevention, screening and treatment of diseases and conditions. Duties of a state health department often include (1) disease surveillance, epidemiology, and data collection; (2) state laboratory services; (3) preparedness and response to public health emergencies; (4) population-based primary prevention; (5) health care services; (6) regulation of health care providers and other licensed professions; (7) environmental health; and (8) technical assistance and training.  According to a recent study, their most common prevention services include tobacco (87%), HIV/AIDS (85%), sexually transmitted disease counseling and partner notification (85%), nutrition (79%), and physical activity (77%).

All Sound good? It is not. Once "vaccines" entered the picture everything changed.  The entire "Public Health" structure has become just one more sales force for Big Pharma.

"Public Health" is so arrogant that they don't really hide this fact.  The more vaccines they push on Americans the better pay this bag of scum gets.  These people deceive the American Public by telling us all that they are here to protect us.  THAT is a lie.  They are here to vaccinate us.

"In addition, more than 90 percent of all state health departments perform vaccine order management and inventory distribution for childhood immunizations, and over 80 percent for adult immunizations."

(3)  The "Astro-Turf" forces funded by Big Pharma – like  the "skeptics" , and even sleazier groups like Every Child by Two (ECBT).  J.B. Handley wrote a superb article about this situation called:

"How The CDC and Big Pharma use Non-profit Front Groups to Advance Extremist Mandatory Vaccination Policy Restricting Religious Freedoms"

In his article J.B says:

"Like many organizations that abuse the 501(c)(3) rules of the Internal Revenue Service, Every Child By Two ("ECBT") puts on a front to the world that they are an independent, compassionate organization of parents?—?originally founded by Rosalynn Carter no less?—?dedicated to the important work of getting every child vaccinated.

In fact, the organization is really a sock-puppet mouthpiece for two masters: 1) the Centers for Disease Control and, 2) vaccine makers, their two primary sources of funding."

And J.B also points out:

"Have you ever heard of a "Special Interest Dot-Org"?

It's a front group for a special interest masquerading as a non-profit organization, and ECBT is one of the more notorious "SIDs" in existence?—?at least to parents of vaccine-injured children like me.

I first wrote about ECBT back in 2008, when nearly half of their annual funding came from the vaccine maker Wyeth.

Just a few months ago in late 2017, the British Medical Journal published their own scathing critique of non-profit, pro-vaccine front groups funded by both the CDC and vaccine makers, and specifically mentioned ECBT:

"IAC, ECBT, and AAP have a few things in common. They are all non-profit organizations with large online presences that promote themselves as sources of reliable information on vaccines.

They also receive funding from both vaccine manufacturers and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. And, in their advocacy for compulsory vaccination, they all have in common a goal that pushes beyond official governmental policy and, in the case of influenza vaccines, the evidence."

Above are our REAL Targets…

We are in a war people…

We need to, figuratively speaking, focus our energies on DESTROYING anyone, and everyone, coming at us with a loaded gun (syringe).  No mercy.  No prisoners. No settlements.  Public hangings, so to speak.   The "Anti-Vax" movement is strong enough, and mean enough, to get this done.  We just have to focus on specific targets, and begin the destruction process…

And, when we shift gears, you will find that we have even more allies than you can imagine…

I am a semi-retired Crisis Management Consultant in Health Care.  My specialty was/is the protection of cutting-edge (Alternative Medicine) health practitioners, and their innovative non-drug offerings.  I have always had to design campaigns to defend against, and attack, what seems like an overwhelming behemoth coming after my clients.  Victory was always easy once we changed the game.

Change the game?  Yes. NEVER fight on the enemy's battlefield.  Lure the dumb bastards onto a killing ground of your own choice.  Prepare well – and watch the enemy walk into the trap.  Then press the button and watch their so-called "overwhelming force" die.

Am I joking?  Nope.  Every "overwhelming force"  has a soft underbelly.  Find it.  Exploit it. Cut it wide open so their entrails are in the dirt.  Then attack relentlessly.  Don't let it get back up.  The "Anti-Vax" movement is PERFECT for this kind of campaign for the massive number of activists cannot be "overwhelmed." 

Remember the Lilliputians in the "Gulliver's Travels" story?  They had a very good way to subdue a big threat…

There is REALLY only one target – Big Pharma…

Want to win the vaccine battle?  Kill Big Pharma.

Everything else will fall into place.

More, Big Pharma has irritated way more than just the big, and powerful "Anti-Vax" movement.  Big Pharma is screwing, virtually, every American there is.  And, America is waking up pissed off.

Do you realize that BOTH political parties in the 2020 Presidential race want Big Pharma reined in?  Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump SOUND JUST ALIKE when they talk about Big Pharma ripping off Americans.

The "Vaccine Solution" is simple…

If we can help Bernie and Donald to cut Big Pharma's income by a significant percentage, they, Big Pharma, will NOT be able to fund their "Astro-Turf" organizations.  Nor will they be able to pour money into the CDC, which goes on to the State and local "Public Health" groups.

Nor will they control our federal and State legislators any more.  They simply  will NOT have the money to buy them.

In essence, we are at the point where, as I showed in the war analogy above, we can completely destroy those shooting at us with bullets (vaccines).  We gave these Big Pharma assholes enough warning – let's go get them.

Stay tuned…


5.  Analysis Part Two – The GOOD And The BAD of Today's "Anti-Vax" Movement…

"What Can We, As the Anti-Vax Movement, SPECIFICALLY DO to WIN the Vaccine War?"

Opinion by "Deplorable" Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Considering the ACTUAL situation I am going to lay out a simple course of action that involves a simple strategy and even simpler tactics.

Will this strategy, and the individual tactics work?  Absolutely.  Why?  Because the "Ant-Vax" Movement is ALMOST there.

Considering that there are literally millions of people in the world-wide "Anti-Vax" Movement  HOW will this solution work?   It will work BECAUSE there ARE so many of us.

When someone like me (a Crisis Management Consultant) designs a campaign the VERY FIRST consideration is "What is the makeup of our own fighting force?"  For instance, in a war, if the enemy has a huge Navy, and we don't, we are NOT going to engage in a naval war.  We are going to arrange a different battlefield – one where WE have the advantage.

What is OUR advantage?  Sheer numbers of REALLY PISSED OFF activists that are smart, innovative people.  People who are DONE being nice.  We have people who are trained to address legislators, and the media, NICELY, and we have those who, like the liberals do, can SPIT on legislators and the media, screaming at them, if we have to.  And we have those who know how to get the public's attention – as you will see demonstrated below.

We have SO MANY people we can conduct simultaneous projects at locations thousands of miles apart that have seemingly entirely different focuses.  Why do that?  Because our opposition is made up entirely of mercenaries who have to get permission, Instructions, funding, and training from "Pro-Vax" Central before they even put on their silk panties first thing in the morning.

What will we accomplish?  Further down in this article I discuss two areas in conducting campaigns that are MISSING in the "Anti-Vax" Movement – "Strategies and Tactics" and "Mission Statements" and "Objectives."

In short, the "Anti-Vax" movement is SO BIG that there has not been an attempt to properly organize it.  My tactic, as a people mover, has been to just let it run – for the anger build, and the result of that, is a strategy and tactic all of its own.

Using the sheer numbers…

One of the things we learned from earlier "Anti-Vax" campaigns was that our opposition is not that large and has to use tricks to seem large and scary.  On the other hand the "Anti-Vax" Movement REALLY IS large and scary – which is why Big Pharma went to the World Health Organization (WHO) and to US Democratic Party legislator Adam Schiff, (laugh here) to ask for help in desperation.

300(?) "Skeptics" between internet forays…

What we found is that the internet trolls that hide on our discussion groups are but a few.  What they do is to create "sock-puppets," perhaps as many as 300 each, to make it appear that MANY others support their argument, when, in fact, NO ONE actually does.

But, the "Anti-Vax" Movement caught on to that crap quickly.  And countered.

But let's talk about how to use those sheer numbers…

Know the difference between "Strategy" and "Tactics…"

Let's define a few things. in their article "Difference between Tactics and Strategies" talks about a business environment.  There is no difference between running a business or a campaign – same thing.

"In a business environment, firms use various techniques, to survive, compete and grow in the long run. These techniques can be called as tactics and strategy. Tactics are the actions, projects or events, to reach a particular point or the desired end, whereas the Strategy is defined as a game plan, which can help the organization to achieve its mission and objectives."

Mission and Objectives?

What I, Tim Bolen – Crisis Management Consultant, noticed in the "Autism" world was a clear lack of strong "Mission and Objectives."

Rest of article HERE





7.  HPV vaccine carries 25% chance of lifelong
sterilization, study finds PDF



Watch Streaming Broadcast Live:

Watch the Ernest Hancock Show on Flote
Watch the Ernest Hancock Show on DLive
Watch the Ernest Hancock Show on
Live Chat
Talk about the Ernest Hancock Show on Telegram
Listen to the Ernest Hancock Show
Live Phone:

Apple Podcast

Please help fund Declare Your Independence with a one-time or recurring donation.

Archive By Year

Shows By Topic

Shows By Guest