Article Image
News Link • Criminal Justice System

Did Joe Sullivan, sentenced to life at 13, have a fair trial?

• Slate
Next week the Supreme Court will hear arguments, in Sullivan v. Florida, about whether sentencing a 13-year-old boy to prison without the possibility of parole violates the cruel-and–unusual-punishment clause of the Constitution. Joe Harris Sullivan is one of two teenagers that young currently doing life without parole for a nonhomicide offense in the United States. His lawyers are hoping that the court will extend its 2005 bar on executing criminals who committed crimes as juveniles to Sullivan's sentence.
 
Whatever the court decides, its ruling will be based on the premise that Sullivan received a fair trial. The adequacy of that proceeding isn't before the justices now. But a brief review of the trial record reveals a process so pathetic that it raises questions about whether Sullivan committed the crime in the first place. It also seems that the trial judge may not have intended to sentence Sullivan to life without parole. In the end, that judge, along with the prosecutor and defense lawyer, failed Sullivan so deeply that we have to wonder whether his sentence reflects a deep and basic failure of ordinary criminal justice.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by Stupid Amerkin
Entered on:

Basic failure of ordinary criminal justice? How about a pandemic of total fraud and corruption from the very scum bottom all the way to the top? What we are dealing with today is the justus system and you know what they say about absolute power.

They say crime doesn't pay, but that depends on which side of the bench you are sitting.


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


Free Talk Live