Oath Keepers a COINTELPRO target?
• Mother JonesAlterNet reporter Adele Stan attended a press conference this past weekend for the Second Amendment March, at which Rhodes groused about mistreatment by Maddow and Justine Sharrock, who wrote our cover story on the group—although he didn't complain, apparently, about being dismissed by Fox News' Bill O'Reilly.
Rhodes feels as though his group has been mischaracterized by the
liberal (and mainstream) media. He's particularly rankled by people
lumping his organization in with racists and militia groups—never mind
that Rhodes has been a vocal supporter both of the militia movement and
of individuals who advocate using force to fight government oppression.
His group is walking a thin line, however, and its rhetoric clearly
resonates with the locked-and-loaded crowd, among others.
Last week, in fact, when Oath Keepers backed out of an alternative
(armed) Second Amendment rally, it wasn't because Rhodes didn't
sympathize with its organizers. Here's what Rhodes said at the press
conference, according to Stan:
"I'm not going to be speaking there, because I'm not going to make it easy for them to paint me as militia," he said. "I'm not going to stand next to a militia leader or a former militia leader and give a speech, because that would be used as something to...incorrectly paint Oath Keepers as something it's not."
Fair enough, but Rhodes also showcased some of the anti-government
paranoia that Oath Keepers routinely disseminates by declaring, for
instance, that the government will almost inevitably, at some point in
the future, herd citizens into detention camps—or take away their guns:
"And the latest thing that they're going to do, I hear from an informant within federal law enforcement," [Rhodes] said, "is a CoInTelPro-style operation to make us look like militia—like the Hutaree, is what we're told—and that should really come as no surprise: That's exactly what the Southern Poverty Law Center's been trying to do, and people like Rachel Maddow and Chris Matthews, and on down the line. This has been a relentless program."
Perhaps the best part of Stan's report was the quasi-interview that
took place when she approached Rhodes after the press conference.
Although it was hard to say who was interviewing whom:
He put me off until his cameraman was free. He records everything now, he said, especially since the Mother Jones piece. "I call it the Justine Sharrock rule," he said.
Rhodes did finally get to his point, though, before cutting the
interview short and implying that Stan was a shoddy journalist—or
something like that.
"The Republicans want to go after Islamic terrorists because they're so afraid of them that they're willing to throw the Bill of Rights in the trash. And they did. And then the Democrats got in. The Democrats are so afraid of the next Timothy McVeigh that they're also willing to throw the Bill of Rights in the trash. They want me Gitmoed, and all this kind of stuff. Or they're like, I don't want the racist." He mimicked a frightened cry.
