Article Image
News Link • 911 / World Trade Center

THIS IS HUGE: Witnesses in Defense Dept. Report Suggest 9/11 Cover-Up (FOXNEWS)

• godlikeproductions.com
A document obtained and witnesses interviewed by Fox News raise new questions over whether there was an effort by the Defense Department to cover up a pre-9/11 military intelligence program known as "Able Danger.

3 Comments in Response to

Comment by Mike Renzulli
Entered on:

This might also add more light on the subject and may compliment bakadude's response: http://screwloosechange.blogspot.com/2010/10/clowns-to-left-of-me.html

Comment by Anonymous
Entered on:

 This report is a huge baloney that deceives the American public. Competing speculators that published sensational books about 911 to make a fortune out of the public’s gullibility had a run for their money.

In this story, Lt.Col. Tony Shaffer published a book "Operation Dark Heart", where Mohammed Atta was mentioned as a dangerous security liability prior to 911. Atta’s alias was alleged to be Mohammed el-Sayed, the terrorist that piloted American Airlines Flight 11 that rammed into the World Trade Center.

Following the publication of Shaffer’s book and for other security reasons, the Department of National Defense launched Able Danger that conducted a thorough investigation. It was determined in this rigorous – and the probe was rigid, even described by enemies of the state as an "aggressive" and "intrusive" intelligence inquiry -- that the recollections of four identified witnesses "WERE NOT ACCURATE" and therefore were unreliable by intelligence standard. To clear the mind of the public of speculative innuendoes published for money, the Defense Department took an "unusual step of buying and destroying 9,500 copies of Shaffer’s [misleading] book …" It was like a regular janitorial job – cleaning up the air with polluting garbage. To say that Shaffer was very angry, is an understatement.

Thus the report clearly appears as purely retaliatory, especially when publication speculators like Shaffer taking advantage of the tragic impact of 911 in the mind of the gullible public for money, are deprived of their fortune when authorities consider their writings garbage, let alone a threat to national security, as in this case. Atta could have been considered a danger to mankind by million others worldwide – not just by Shaffer in his money-making book -- but just the same … it does not support these rising hallucination conspiracy theories that the US Government, not Osama bin Ladin and his Al Qaeda minions, had plotted 911 and used the likes of Atta terrorists to carry out this carnage. That’s a fairy tale meant for children with a bogeyman under their bed. The American public is neither intellectually disabled nor mentally retarded to buy this crap.

This article suggest a "9/11 Cover Up" that does not connect at all. On the contrary, it is a perfect cover up for the anger of the likes of Shaffer whose writings meant to incite gullible hordes of the American public, had to be turned down by our intelligence community as trash. Maybe there was a certain degree of intelligence omission here prior to 911, but it does not mean that because Shaffer’s pre-911 book was trounced and circulation immobilized, the Government did 911. For instance, substituting reality with innuendoes that the Twin Towers were not struck down by jetliners and what was seen by millions of American witnesses was just a camera trick, is a very poor way of earning a living by publishing a book of public conjuring and sensational deception.

 
Comment by Anonymous
Entered on:

     This report is a huge baloney that deceives the American public. Competing speculators that published sensational books about 911 to make a fortune out of the public’s gullibility had a run for their money.

 

     In this story, Lt.Col. Tony Shaffer published a book “Operation Dark Heart”, where Mohammed Atta was mentioned as a dangerous security liability prior to 911. Atta’s alias was alleged to be Mohammed el-Sayed, the terrorist that piloted American Airlines Flight 11 that rammed into the World Trade Center.  

 

      Following the publication of Shaffer’s book and for other security reasons, the Department of National Defense launched Able Danger that conducted a thorough investigation. It was determined in this rigorous – and the probe was rigid, even described by enemies of the state as an “aggressive” and “intrusive” intelligence inquiry -- that the recollections of four identified witnesses “WHERE NOT ACCURATE” and therefore were unreliable by intelligence standard. To clear the mind of the public of speculative innuendoes published for money, the Defense Department took an “unusual step of buying and destroying 9,500 copies of Shaffer’s [misleading] book …” It was like a regular janitorial job – cleaning up the air with polluting garbage. To say that Shaffer was very angry, is an understatement.

 

       Thus the report clearly appears as purely retaliatory, especially when publication speculators like Shaffer taking advantage of the tragic impact of 911 in the mind of the gullible public for money, are deprived of their fortune when authorities consider their writings garbage, let alone a threat to national security, as in this case. Atta could have been considered a danger to mankind by million others worldwide – not just by Shaffer in his money-making book -- but just the same … it does not support these rising hallucination conspiracy theories that the US Government, not Osama bin Ladin and his Al Qaeda minions, had plotted 911 and used the likes of Atta terrorists to carry out this carnage. That’s a fairy tale meant for children with a bogeyman under their bed. The American public is neither intellectually disabled nor mentally retarded to buy this crap.

 

      This article suggest a “9/11 Cover Up” that does not connect at all. On the contrary, it is a perfect cover up for the anger of the likes of Shaffer whose writings meant to incite gullible hordes of the American public, had to be turned down by our intelligence community as trash.  Maybe there was a certain degree of intelligence omission here prior to 911, but it does not mean that because Shaffer’s pre-911 book was trounced and circulation immobilized, the Government did 911.  For instance, substituting reality with innuendoes that the Twin Towers were not struck down by jetliners and what was seen by millions of American witnesses was just a camera trick, is a very poor way of earning a living by publishing a book of public conjuring and sensational deception.

 

 


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


Stop Wars T-shirt at The Bitcoin Store