Article Image
News Link • Housing

Foreclosure-Gate: The Short Text of The Senates Big Banking Fix

• Businessinsider.com/
 
Begun and held at the City of Washington on Tuesday, the fifth day of January, two thousand and ten an act To require any Federal or State court to recognize any notarization made by a notary public licensed by a State other than the State where the court is located when such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, SECTION 1. Short title. This Act may be cited as the “Interstate Recognition of Notarizations Act of 2010”. SEC. 2. Recognition of notarizations in Federal courts. Each Federal court shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a State other than the State where the Federal court is located if— (1) such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce; and (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record so as to render the record tamper-resistant. SEC. 3. Recognition of notarizations in State courts. Each court that operates under the jurisdiction of a State shall recognize any lawful notarization made by a notary public licensed or commissioned under the laws of a State other than the State where the court is located if— (1) such notarization occurs in or affects interstate commerce; and (2)(A) a seal of office, as symbol of the notary public’s authority, is used in the notarization; or (B) in the case of an electronic record, the seal information is securely attached to, or logically associated with, the electronic record so as to render the record tamper-resistant. SEC. 4. Definitions. In this Act: (1) ELECTRONIC RECORD.—The term “electronic record” has the meaning given that term in section 106 of the Electronic Signatures in Global and National Commerce Act (15 U.S.C. 7006). (2) LOGICALLY ASSOCIATED WITH.—Seal information is “logically associated with” an electronic record if the seal information is securely bound to the electronic record in such a manner as to make it impracticable to falsify or alter, without detection, either the record or the seal information.

1 Comments in Response to

Comment by Dan Burns
Entered on:

The court already does recognize a Notary Affidavit from another state.

This bill changes nothing...other than to keep the Notaries in check from this point forward when the bill is passed into law. 

All this bill says is that the Notaries better follow procedure or they are in violation of the bill (soon to be law)

To me that sounds like another tool for the foreclosure toolbox.

There is a saying that: "An unrebutted Affidavit stands as truth"

So what do we need to do? Object to everything and move the court to sequester the Notary and their pages to testify under oath, to face your accuser.

I believe court rules are still in play, for now at least.

 

 


Join us on our Social Networks:

 

Share this page with your friends on your favorite social network:


Stop Wars T-shirt at The Bitcoin Store