What the #$%^? They're trying to debunk "myths" that the constitution can't be rewritten and assert that the founding fathers supported constitutional conventions. Huh? Other than the ONE con con in 1776, where do they get THAT from? (Answer: made it up)
Now, they are going to come out with a "study" meant to confuse conservatives and patriots in an attempt to "prove" their case.
Several months ago the GW institute had the former Comptroller of the US out to a lunch and dinner. He tried to make the same case and couldn't explain why they couldn't just follow the amendment process and needed a constitutional convention.
He just kept asserting over and over that a con con was needed.
Hmmm... can anyone say NWO OPERATIVE??
Join us on our
Share this page with your friends
on your favorite social network: