Romney Would Sign NDAA
• www.prisonplanet.comPrior to his recent assertion that it is perfectly normal to dispense with the Fourth Amendment and suspend habeas corpus, Romney said he wasn’t up to speed on the law and promised to post an analysis on his website, which he never did.
Romney said you don’t have the “right to join a group that has challenged America” and then mentioned al-Qaeda, the terror group that the FBI admits poses little threat to the nation.
The NDAA, however, is not about indefinitely detaining Muslim cave dwellers. It’s about disappearing American citizens who oppose the bankster cartel now in control of the government.
The law is a “violent and sudden usurpation” of the Constitution of the sort James Madison warned about. The founders considered habeas corpus the most fundamental of rights because it insured that the executive branch could not hold people without cause. It was so important the founders included it in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution.
Truman tried to veto the Internal Security Act of 1950 that codified indefinite detention without trial but he was overturned by Congress.Truman said it was “the greatest danger to freedom of speech, press, and assembly” since the Alien and Sedition Laws of 1798 and represented a “mockery of the Bill of Rights” and was a “long step toward totalitarianism.”
Watch Streaming Broadcast Live:
Flote
LRN.fm
DLive
Telegram
5 Comments in Response to Romney Would Sign NDAA
If you are NOT a terrorist, and you are free to enjoy your freedom to hate and criticize the Government as you do now, are you saying that NDAA was passed purposedly to detain you? Now, that's really RETARDED.
ONCE AGAIN all we need is 'Ernie's Magical Formula':
"There are two kinds of people in this world; those who want to be left alone, and those that JUST WON'T LEAVE THEM ALONE."
Reading these comments, it's easy to see just who is who.
Keep talking 'control and ownership' of others, and you will eventually FALL UNDER THE CONTROL MATRIX YOU CREATE.
Naomi Wolfe sees this:
http://naomiwolf.org/2011/12/how-congress-is-signing-its-own-arrest-warrants-in-the-ndaa-citizen-arrest-bill/
Now, call some more names! Something more exotic than 'ignorant' and 'retard' would be less repetitive. Show your colors!
Recorded at:
http://wso.williams.edu/~rcarson/lizards.html
near the bottom.
Or check the whole think in the comments at
http://www.freedomsphoenix.com/Discussion-Page.htm?EdNo=001&Info=103529&View=Hide
"I'll look. Tell me about the lizards."
Ford shrugged again.
"Some people say that the lizards are the best thing that ever happened to them," he said. "They're completely wrong of course, completely and utterly wrong, but someone's got to say it."
It looks like only those for Ron Paul has this fancy, if not funny but dangerous idea that NDAA was passed by Congress purposely to catch and detain Americans that “oppose the bankster cartel” [“bankster cartel” (???) which does not even exist, but only in the imagination! That’s a miss of the target by more than a mile.
Here in this website, opposition to NDAA is brainless. It is stupid for anyone to say that the NDAA law was passed purposely to detain Americans who enjoy their liberty to criticize the Government. That’s retarded.
Romney had the patience to explain to ignorant hecklers in the audience that NDAA is for people who joined the cause of Al Qaeda, as well as radical groups who attack the Government “which is treason” according to him. I endorse that statement.
There is no difference, only his radical demeanor and anti-government aggression make the difference. Only his supporters, whose level of intelligence tells us, that defending Al Qaeda in 911 [which Ron Paul did] is not the same as defending terrorism. The listening public is not that stupid.
Does he know that our DND budget is already very low compared to that of several previous years when in fact today the threat to our national security is more severe than the threat we have had in those previous years when our DND budgets were even higher? No, this is only for those who knew. No, he has no idea at all when he opened his mouth to protest against national security funding.
More are coming in the days ahead. SOFA and PIPA are to follow NDAA. The passing of the increasing number of national security laws rises in tandem with the rising attacks against the State, and as well as against the proliferation of civil rights movements joining the cause of terrorists, which threatens our national security.