
-
Special Editions
- Global
- Due Diligence
- Love Bus Liberty Tour
- Vaccine Education Summit
- Bitcoin Summit
- US-Arizona
- US-Tennessee
- Ernie's Favorites
- THE R3VOLUTION CONTINUES
- "It's Not My Debt"
- Fascist Nation's Favorites
- Surviving the Greatest Depression
- The Only Solution - Direct Action Revolution
- Western Libertarian
- S.A.F.E. - Second Amendment is For Everyone
- Freedom Summit
- Declare Your Independence
- FreedomsPhoenix Speakers Bureau
- Wallet Voting
- Harhea Phoenix
- Black Market Friday

Current News | Contents By Subject
Additional Related items you might find interesting:Related items:

News Link •
Propaganda
Doctors from USC, UCLA say mask mandates for COVID-19 not effective, as debate goes on

News Link •
Biden-Harris Deep Fake Administration
Djokovic Forced Out of Tennis Tournament by Biden Ban on Unvaxed Travellers

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Govt Database Reveals 10,000% Increase in Cancer Reports Linked to COVID Vaccines

News Link •
Food And Drug Administration / F.D.A
Is the Untested and Dangerous Monkeypox Vaccine About to get an EUA -

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
'Stunning' Link Between Pfizer Vaccine and Myocarditis in Teens, Study Shows

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Dr. Robert Malone: 'We Have Got to Pay Attention to This Hot Mess'

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
New Lyme disease vaccine targets decades of anti-vax misinformation

News Link •
Health and Physical Fitness
Massage Therapist Blows Whistle: Bioweapon Shots Causing Massive Deadly Blood Clots

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Is the Untested and Dangerous Monkeypox Vaccine About to get an EUA to Avoid Legal...

News Link •
Vaccines and Vaccinations
Why are so many "fully vaccinated" people catching COVID a second time?

News Link •
Investigations
2 Comments in Response to Vaccination rights attorney Patricia Finn threatened with criminal charges
It's called Judaical murder
It's never too late to flog a deceased equine.
That being said, the recipriocal demonizations occuring in this situation distract from core rights issues.
In FP 78, Hamilton asserted that Congress was supposed to pass legislation which reflected the will of (We) the people. If Congress substituted its will for that of the people, the courts were supposed to intervene in favor of the people.
Of course, Hamiltion said this at a time when he needed votes for ratification. Once ratification was obtained, of Hamilton, it is said, every time he was offered a chance to vote on a measure that increased the power of the federal government, he voted FOR it.
Doubtless, Hamilton reveled in the supremacy clause. Also doubtless, he probably did NOT revel in the 10th amendment.
The 10th amendment affirms the people's concurrence with Hamilton's (empty) promise made by him in FP 78.
Those who argue in favor of States' rights overlook the last phrase in the 10th amendment, namely
. . . reserved . . . to the people.
Vaccination choices should be reserved to the people.
It being that such choices would not likely lead to riot or invasion, the federal government would have been hands off in 1789, and even moreso in 1791.
But according to the article above, this controversy originates in a state court.
(Maybe the anti-statists are right!)
I think I'll give the decease equine a rest at this point.
DC Treybil